Godwin's Law

From FasciPedia
Revision as of 18:25, 8 February 2024 by ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—น (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{Reflist}}" to "{{Reflist|2}}")
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Godwin's law, short for Godwin's law (or rule) of Nazi analogies,[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer (regardless of topic or scope), the probability of the word "Nazi" appearing or Adolf Hitler approaches 1.[2][3]

Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] He stated that he introduced Godwin's law in 1990 as an experiment in memetics.[2] Later it was applied to any Conversation or online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6] where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.

In 2012, "Godwin's law" became an entry in the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.[7] In 2021, Harvard researchers published an article showing the phenomenon occurs with statistically meaningful frequency e erywhere but Reddit discussions.[8][9]

Generalization, corollaries, and usage

There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that, when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.[10] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law.[11][12]

See also

Further reading

==External links== *"I Seem to be a Verb"; Mike Godwin's commentary on the 18th anniversary of Godwin's law

References

  1. โ†‘ 1.0 1.1 Tim Skirvin (September 15, 1999). How to post about Hitler and get away with itโ€”the Godwin's law FAQ. Skirv's Wiki.
  2. โ†‘ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Godwin, Mike (October 1994). "Meme, Counter-meme". Wired. https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.10/godwin.if_pr.html. Retrieved March 24, 2006. 
  3. โ†‘ 3.0 3.1 Godwin, Mike (January 12, 1995). Godwin's law of Hitler Analogies (and Corollaries) pp. "Net Culture โ€“ Humor" archive section. Electronic Frontier Foundation.
  4. โ†‘ Template:Cite newsgroup
  5. โ†‘ Goldacre, Ben (September 16, 2010). Pope aligns atheists with Nazis. Bizarre. Transcript here.. bengoldacre โ€“ secondary blog.
  6. โ†‘ broken cite news
  7. โ†‘ Godwin's law. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
  8. โ†‘ Harrison, Stephen (2022-01-24). Has Godwinโ€™s Law, the Rule of Nazi Comparisons, Been Disproved? (en).
  9. โ†‘ Fariello, Gabriele; Jemielniak, Dariusz; Sulkowski, Adam (2021-12-07). "Does Godwinโ€™s law (rule of Nazi analogies) apply in observable reality? An empirical study of selected words in 199 million Reddit posts" (in en). New Media & Society (SAGE Publishing). doi:10.1177/14614448211062070. ISSN 1461-4448. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448211062070. 
  10. โ†‘ "Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe". The Daily Telegraph (London), October 23, 2009.
  11. โ†‘ Template:Cite episode
  12. โ†‘ David Weigel, "Hands Off Hitler! It's time to repeal Godwin's Law" Reason (magazine), July 14, 2005