Anti-Holohoax revisionism - Revision history

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe " to "the "

2024-04-28T22:57:07Z

Text replacement - "tbe " to "the "

Show changes

Bacchus: Text replacement - " the " to " tbe "

2024-04-26T16:55:33Z

Text replacement - " the " to " tbe "

Show changes

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 moved page Anti-Holocaust revisionism to Anti-Holohoax revisionism: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T09:17:10Z

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 moved page Anti-Holocaust revisionism to Anti-Holohoax revisionism: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:17, 25 February 2024
(No difference)

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T07:40:38Z

Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

Show changes

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - ".jpg|" to ".png|"

2024-02-22T23:13:54Z

Text replacement - ".jpg|" to ".png|"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:13, 22 February 2024
Line 97:		Line 97:

	== "Conspiracy theories" ==		== "Conspiracy theories" ==
	{{Multiple image\|direction=vertical\|align=right\|image1=Voroshilov, Molotov, Stalin, with Nikolai Yezhov.~~jpg~~\|image2=The Commissar Vanishes 2.~~jpg~~\|width=300\|caption1=\|caption2=The first photo shows [[Joseph Stalin]] with the "Vanishing Commissar" ([[Nikolai Yezhov]]) in 1937, before Soviet retouching.<br>		{{Multiple image\|direction=vertical\|align=right\|image1=Voroshilov, Molotov, Stalin, with Nikolai Yezhov.png\|image2=The Commissar Vanishes 2.png\|width=300\|caption1=\|caption2=The first photo shows [[Joseph Stalin]] with the "Vanishing Commissar" ([[Nikolai Yezhov]]) in 1937, before Soviet retouching.<br>

	The second photo is after Soviet retouching, with Yezhov entirely removed. Also non-revisionist historians admit that the [[Communist]] [[Soviet Union]] had long "conspired" to deceive the general public by using such fabrications and false propaganda in order to rewrite history before the war, but revisionists argue that such fabrications and false propaganda did not cease with the start of WWII but continued during and after WWII.<br>		The second photo is after Soviet retouching, with Yezhov entirely removed. Also non-revisionist historians admit that the [[Communist]] [[Soviet Union]] had long "conspired" to deceive the general public by using such fabrications and false propaganda in order to rewrite history before the war, but revisionists argue that such fabrications and false propaganda did not cease with the start of WWII but continued during and after WWII.<br>
Line 133:		Line 133:

	=== Focus on the Western Holocaust camps ===		=== Focus on the Western Holocaust camps ===
	[[File:Bergen Belsen Liberation 03.~~jpg~~\|thumb\|300px\|right\|A British Army bulldozer pushes bodies into a mass grave at the Bergen-Belsen camp in 1945. Today it is admitted that the deaths in this camp were not due to gassings, but due to causes such as starvation and diseases. However, such images of corpses and mass graves have often been framed as showing victims of German mass killings/gassings. See [[Western Holocaust camps]].		[[File:Bergen Belsen Liberation 03.png\|thumb\|300px\|right\|A British Army bulldozer pushes bodies into a mass grave at the Bergen-Belsen camp in 1945. Today it is admitted that the deaths in this camp were not due to gassings, but due to causes such as starvation and diseases. However, such images of corpses and mass graves have often been framed as showing victims of German mass killings/gassings. See [[Western Holocaust camps]].
	<br/><br/>		<br/><br/>
	[[Josef Kramer]], Commandant of the Bergen-Belsen camp, stated that "''The camp was not really inefficient before you [British and American forces] crossed the Rhine. There was running water, regular meals of a kind […]. But then they suddenly began to send me trainloads of new prisoners from all over Germany. It was impossible to cope with them. […] Then as a last straw the Allies bombed the electric plant that pumped our water. Loads of food were unable to reach the camp because of the Allied fighters. Then things really got out of hand. […] I did not even have sufficient staff to bury the dead, let alone segregate the sick. […] I tried to get medicines and food for the prisoners and I failed. I was swamped.''"<ref name=gr1/>		[[Josef Kramer]], Commandant of the Bergen-Belsen camp, stated that "''The camp was not really inefficient before you [British and American forces] crossed the Rhine. There was running water, regular meals of a kind […]. But then they suddenly began to send me trainloads of new prisoners from all over Germany. It was impossible to cope with them. […] Then as a last straw the Allies bombed the electric plant that pumped our water. Loads of food were unable to reach the camp because of the Allied fighters. Then things really got out of hand. […] I did not even have sufficient staff to bury the dead, let alone segregate the sick. […] I tried to get medicines and food for the prisoners and I failed. I was swamped.''"<ref name=gr1/>

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

2024-02-21T00:21:10Z

Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Category:The Holocaust" to "Category:The Holohoax"

2024-02-18T21:51:53Z

Text replacement - "Category:The Holocaust" to "Category:The Holohoax"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 18 February 2024
Line 172:		Line 172:

	[[Category:Censorship]]		[[Category:Censorship]]
	[[Category:The ~~Holocaust~~]]		[[Category:The Holohoax]]
	[[Category:Revisionism]]		[[Category:Revisionism]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Nationalist" to "Fascist"

2024-02-15T18:22:26Z

Text replacement - "Nationalist" to "Fascist"

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 15 February 2024
Line 114:		Line 114:
	If there was a single powerful propaganda actor who had carefully planned a false genocide story, then one would expect a story that would at least superficially be consistent. Instead, Holocaust revisionists have argued that the different Holocaust stories are often grossly absurd and inconsistent, which would fit with there being many different propaganda actors, ranging from individuals to countries, with different motives, sometimes copying some propaganda parts from other actors, sometimes inventing propaganda on their own, which would cause numerous different stories, often absurd and contradictory. See also [[Allied psychological warfare]].		If there was a single powerful propaganda actor who had carefully planned a false genocide story, then one would expect a story that would at least superficially be consistent. Instead, Holocaust revisionists have argued that the different Holocaust stories are often grossly absurd and inconsistent, which would fit with there being many different propaganda actors, ranging from individuals to countries, with different motives, sometimes copying some propaganda parts from other actors, sometimes inventing propaganda on their own, which would cause numerous different stories, often absurd and contradictory. See also [[Allied psychological warfare]].

	Regarding individuals who, for example, may have used coercive methods on National Socialists in order to obtain confessions, this must not necessarily have been due to being part of a secret conspiracy, but may have been due to a sincere belief that the Holocaust did occur as claimed by the politically correct versions and that coercion was needed in order to obtain confessions from lying perpetrators. Similarly, even individuals who may have fabricated/edited ~~Nationalist~~ Socialist documents must not necessarily have been part of a conspiracy, but may have done so, for example, in order to ensure convictions of accused who were viewed as guilty, even if clear evidence for this was lacking. Furthermore, possibly deliberately false witness testimonies need not have been due to the witnesses being part of a secret conspiracy but may have been due to coercion, personal gain, group gain, and/or a variety of other factors as discussed in the article on [[Holocaust testimonial evidence]].		Regarding individuals who, for example, may have used coercive methods on National Socialists in order to obtain confessions, this must not necessarily have been due to being part of a secret conspiracy, but may have been due to a sincere belief that the Holocaust did occur as claimed by the politically correct versions and that coercion was needed in order to obtain confessions from lying perpetrators. Similarly, even individuals who may have fabricated/edited Fascist Socialist documents must not necessarily have been part of a conspiracy, but may have done so, for example, in order to ensure convictions of accused who were viewed as guilty, even if clear evidence for this was lacking. Furthermore, possibly deliberately false witness testimonies need not have been due to the witnesses being part of a secret conspiracy but may have been due to coercion, personal gain, group gain, and/or a variety of other factors as discussed in the article on [[Holocaust testimonial evidence]].

	Revisionists have differed regarding to what degree they see the politically correct Holocaust version as being deliberately fabricated. For example, some have viewed documents often cited as evidence for the Holocaust as fabricated/edited, others have viewed them as authentic but misinterpreted. Many would likely argue that much of the initial wartime propaganda was (like the WWI wartime propaganda) at first deliberately fabricated by various parties, but that many others started to sincerely believe that the claims were true. Such views were immensely strengthened and seen as verified at the end of the war, by the discovery of some camps that did contain many corpses. Regarding the continuation of the wartime propaganda into the postwar period, some have seen this as deliberately organized falsehoods (especially by [[Stalin]]'s Soviet Union), others as akin to the European [[witch hunts]] and witch trials that self-propagated into a massive movement in which many of the participants sincerely believed (based numerous "witnesses", "confessors", and other forms of "evidence") that witches existed and needed to be severely persecuted for the good of society.<ref name=gr1/><ref>Paul Eisen. But how could the Holocaust not be true? http://codoh.com/library/document/1970/</ref>		Revisionists have differed regarding to what degree they see the politically correct Holocaust version as being deliberately fabricated. For example, some have viewed documents often cited as evidence for the Holocaust as fabricated/edited, others have viewed them as authentic but misinterpreted. Many would likely argue that much of the initial wartime propaganda was (like the WWI wartime propaganda) at first deliberately fabricated by various parties, but that many others started to sincerely believe that the claims were true. Such views were immensely strengthened and seen as verified at the end of the war, by the discovery of some camps that did contain many corpses. Regarding the continuation of the wartime propaganda into the postwar period, some have seen this as deliberately organized falsehoods (especially by [[Stalin]]'s Soviet Union), others as akin to the European [[witch hunts]] and witch trials that self-propagated into a massive movement in which many of the participants sincerely believed (based numerous "witnesses", "confessors", and other forms of "evidence") that witches existed and needed to be severely persecuted for the good of society.<ref name=gr1/><ref>Paul Eisen. But how could the Holocaust not be true? http://codoh.com/library/document/1970/</ref>

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "{{reflist}}" to "{{reflist|2}}"

2024-02-07T08:04:42Z

Text replacement - "{{reflist}}" to "{{reflist|2}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 6 February 2024
Line 169:		Line 169:
	* [[Stalinist crimes (negationism)]]		* [[Stalinist crimes (negationism)]]
	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist\|2}}

	[[Category:Censorship]]		[[Category:Censorship]]
	[[Category:The Holocaust]]		[[Category:The Holocaust]]
	[[Category:Revisionism]]		[[Category:Revisionism]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: 1 revision imported

2024-02-05T21:33:08Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:33, 5 February 2024
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 20 February 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:
	The Holocaust is in many Western countries an official "Truth" that is illegal to discuss and research freely. Continued attempts are made to extend such censorship to the remaining Western countries that still allow free debate and research on the issue. In 2014, Russia and Greece implemented "Holocaust denial" laws. In 2015, Romania implemented such a law (with help of the [[United States Holocaust Memorial Museum‎]]).<ref>Why Romania had to ban Holocaust denial twice https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/07/27/why-romania-had-to-ban-holocaust-denial-twice/</ref> In 2016, Italy implemented a "Holocaust denial" law. Lobbying efforts are ongoing in order to make the [[European Union]] pass legislation prohibiting free discussion and research in all EU countries.		The Holocaust is in many Western countries an official "Truth" that is illegal to discuss and research freely. Continued attempts are made to extend such censorship to the remaining Western countries that still allow free debate and research on the issue. In 2014, Russia and Greece implemented "Holocaust denial" laws. In 2015, Romania implemented such a law (with help of the [[United States Holocaust Memorial Museum‎]]).<ref>Why Romania had to ban Holocaust denial twice https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/07/27/why-romania-had-to-ban-holocaust-denial-twice/</ref> In 2016, Italy implemented a "Holocaust denial" law. Lobbying efforts are ongoing in order to make the [[European Union]] pass legislation prohibiting free discussion and research in all EU countries.

	In 2013, the [[World ~~Jewish~~ Congress]] passed a resolution demanding that all the countries of the world must prohibit public "Holocaust denial".<ref>WJC Approves Resolution Calling for Ban of Public Holocaust Denial http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/wjc-approves-resolution-calling-for-ban-of-public-holocaust-denial.premium-1.519763</ref>		In 2013, the [[World jewish Congress]] passed a resolution demanding that all the countries of the world must prohibit public "Holocaust denial".<ref>WJC Approves Resolution Calling for Ban of Public Holocaust Denial http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/wjc-approves-resolution-calling-for-ban-of-public-holocaust-denial.premium-1.519763</ref>

	Some notable convictions for "Holocaust denial" include against		Some notable convictions for "Holocaust denial" include against
Line 45:		Line 45:
	== Related censorship ==		== Related censorship ==
	*"Holocaust denial" laws may or may not also include more general censorship of free discussion and research on many other aspects of the history of National Socialist Germany. See [[National Socialist Germany revisionism]].		*"Holocaust denial" laws may or may not also include more general censorship of free discussion and research on many other aspects of the history of National Socialist Germany. See [[National Socialist Germany revisionism]].
	*There may be related censorship of various aspects of WWII, such as in Russia (censorship prohibiting discussion of stated Soviet atrocities) and Poland (censorship prohibiting discussion of stated Polish atrocities). The Polish censorship has caused large-scale ~~Jewish~~ protests (including by organizations that support "Holocaust denial" censorship) due to the Polish censorship censoring claims of Polish involvement in the Holocaust.<ref>Israel Slams ‘Baseless’ Holocaust Legislation in Poland https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/27/world/middleeast/poland-holocaust-law-israel.html</ref>		*There may be related censorship of various aspects of WWII, such as in Russia (censorship prohibiting discussion of stated Soviet atrocities) and Poland (censorship prohibiting discussion of stated Polish atrocities). The Polish censorship has caused large-scale jewish protests (including by organizations that support "Holocaust denial" censorship) due to the Polish censorship censoring claims of Polish involvement in the Holocaust.<ref>Israel Slams ‘Baseless’ Holocaust Legislation in Poland https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/27/world/middleeast/poland-holocaust-law-israel.html</ref>
	*In some countries, there may be laws against "genocide denials" more generally, but the Holocaust arguably has a special position regarding the amount of criticisms against the official version and also regarding the degree of repression of such criticisms.		*In some countries, there may be laws against "genocide denials" more generally, but the Holocaust arguably has a special position regarding the amount of criticisms against the official version and also regarding the degree of repression of such criticisms.

	== Holocaust revisionism and "hate speech" ==		== Holocaust revisionism and "hate speech" ==
	Official reasons for "Holocaust denial" laws have included that the revisionist arguments are "[[hate speech]]" against ~~Jews~~. One supposed reason for this is that revisionists argue that some ~~Jewish~~ "witnesses" have deliberately lied for various forms of gain. However, this does not mean that all ~~Jews~~ are responsible for these argued lies (in the same way that not all citizens of warring states are responsible for argued war crimes committed by some individuals during a war).		Official reasons for "Holocaust denial" laws have included that the revisionist arguments are "[[hate speech]]" against jews. One supposed reason for this is that revisionists argue that some jewish "witnesses" have deliberately lied for various forms of gain. However, this does not mean that all jews are responsible for these argued lies (in the same way that not all citizens of warring states are responsible for argued war crimes committed by some individuals during a war).

	*See the article on [[Holocaust motivations]] and the section on "Argued exploitation" on revisionists arguing that many non-~~Jewish~~ individuals and groups have deliberately lied about and gained from the politically correct version.		*See the article on [[Holocaust motivations]] and the section on "Argued exploitation" on revisionists arguing that many non-jewish individuals and groups have deliberately lied about and gained from the politically correct version.
	*See the article [[Holocaust awareness]] on most "Holocaust survivors" never themselves witnessing any genocidal mass killings according to the politically correct version. See also the article [[Holocaust testimonial evidence]] and in particular the section "Witness testimonies" on there being many possible reasons for giving inaccurate testimonies other than deliberate, voluntary lying. Thus, criticizing the politically correct Holocaust version does not mean that every "Holocaust survivor" is accused of being a deliberate, voluntary liar.		*See the article [[Holocaust awareness]] on most "Holocaust survivors" never themselves witnessing any genocidal mass killings according to the politically correct version. See also the article [[Holocaust testimonial evidence]] and in particular the section "Witness testimonies" on there being many possible reasons for giving inaccurate testimonies other than deliberate, voluntary lying. Thus, criticizing the politically correct Holocaust version does not mean that every "Holocaust survivor" is accused of being a deliberate, voluntary liar.

	Revisionists also argue that the political correct version in practice cause collective guilt and hatred against Germans in general and has contributed to large scale crimes against German civilians (see the article on [[Claimed mass killings of Germans by the WWII Allies]]). Thus, it is possible to see the politically correct version of the Holocaust as "hate speech".		Revisionists also argue that the political correct version in practice cause collective guilt and hatred against Germans in general and has contributed to large scale crimes against German civilians (see the article on [[Claimed mass killings of Germans by the WWII Allies]]). Thus, it is possible to see the politically correct version of the Holocaust as "hate speech".

	An established ~~Jewish~~ author who visited a Holocaust revisionist conference wrote regarding hate that "''I would see none of it, certainly less than I would see when ~~Jews~~ were speaking of Germans. No one had ever said anything remotely like [[Elie Wiesel]], ‘Every ~~Jew~~, somewhere in his being, should set aside a zone of hate–healthy, virile hate – for what persists in the Germans,’ and no one had said anything like Edgar Bronfman, the president of the [[World ~~Jewish~~ Congress]]. A shocked professor told Bronfman once, ‘You are teaching a whole generation to hate thousands of Germans,’ and Bronfman replied, ‘No, I am teaching a whole generation to hate millions of Germans.’''"<ref name=gr1>Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust—Controversial Issues Cross Examined 2nd, revised and corrected edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15</ref>		An established jewish author who visited a Holocaust revisionist conference wrote regarding hate that "''I would see none of it, certainly less than I would see when jews were speaking of Germans. No one had ever said anything remotely like [[Elie Wiesel]], ‘Every jew, somewhere in his being, should set aside a zone of hate–healthy, virile hate – for what persists in the Germans,’ and no one had said anything like Edgar Bronfman, the president of the [[World jewish Congress]]. A shocked professor told Bronfman once, ‘You are teaching a whole generation to hate thousands of Germans,’ and Bronfman replied, ‘No, I am teaching a whole generation to hate millions of Germans.’''"<ref name=gr1>Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust—Controversial Issues Cross Examined 2nd, revised and corrected edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15</ref>

	Also, if the politically correct version is false, then numerous people (including researchers not advocating any form of violence) have been falsely punished in various trials and sometimes executed.		Also, if the politically correct version is false, then numerous people (including researchers not advocating any form of violence) have been falsely punished in various trials and sometimes executed.
Line 70:		Line 70:
	More unofficial reasons for laws against "Holocaust denial" may be that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is weak and cannot stand open debate, that many groups have gained from and have vested interests in the politically correct version, [[pathological altruism]], and [[White guilt]] and exploitation of such guilt. Comparisons have also been made with blasphemy laws, see the [[Holocaustianity]] article.		More unofficial reasons for laws against "Holocaust denial" may be that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is weak and cannot stand open debate, that many groups have gained from and have vested interests in the politically correct version, [[pathological altruism]], and [[White guilt]] and exploitation of such guilt. Comparisons have also been made with blasphemy laws, see the [[Holocaustianity]] article.

	Revisionists have argued that some mainstream historians have in effect admitted that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is very weak.<ref name=stake>The Non-~~Jewish~~ Stake in the Holocaust Mythology: Why the Continued Success of a Failed Ideology? https://codoh.com/library/document/1919/?lang=en</ref>		Revisionists have argued that some mainstream historians have in effect admitted that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is very weak.<ref name=stake>The Non-jewish Stake in the Holocaust Mythology: Why the Continued Success of a Failed Ideology? https://codoh.com/library/document/1919/?lang=en</ref>

	== The term "Holocaust denial" and straw man revisionism ==		== The term "Holocaust denial" and straw man revisionism ==
Line 87:		Line 87:
	*[[Holocaust_material_evidence#Gas_vans_and_gas_chambers_using_diesel_exhaust\|Holocaust material evidence: Gas vans and gas chambers using diesel exhaust]].		*[[Holocaust_material_evidence#Gas_vans_and_gas_chambers_using_diesel_exhaust\|Holocaust material evidence: Gas vans and gas chambers using diesel exhaust]].

	Also, only some aspects of the politically correct view on the Holocaust are "denied"/revised by Holocaust revisionists, while other aspects are accepted (such as persecutions and deportations of ~~Jews~~). In addition, revisionists do not deny the existence of some events, but argue that the politically correct version of what happened is incorrect (such as killings of some ~~Jews~~ by the [[Einsatzgruppen]]). Furthermore, non-revisionists are argued to incorrectly deny, minimize, and/or ignore many events (such as [[World War II statements argued to support Holocaust revisionism]]).		Also, only some aspects of the politically correct view on the Holocaust are "denied"/revised by Holocaust revisionists, while other aspects are accepted (such as persecutions and deportations of jews). In addition, revisionists do not deny the existence of some events, but argue that the politically correct version of what happened is incorrect (such as killings of some jews by the [[Einsatzgruppen]]). Furthermore, non-revisionists are argued to incorrectly deny, minimize, and/or ignore many events (such as [[World War II statements argued to support Holocaust revisionism]]).

	This use of the term "Holocaust denial" can also be seen as only one part of a more general [[straw man]] revisionism. What revisionists actually argue is misrepresented or anti-revisionists only reply to old arguments, while ignoring newer research (such as only replying to the first Leuchter Report, while ignoring later reports and arguments on Zyklon B derivatives measurements, see the article on [[Missing Zyklon B derivatives in claimed homicidal gas chamber walls argument]]).		This use of the term "Holocaust denial" can also be seen as only one part of a more general [[straw man]] revisionism. What revisionists actually argue is misrepresented or anti-revisionists only reply to old arguments, while ignoring newer research (such as only replying to the first Leuchter Report, while ignoring later reports and arguments on Zyklon B derivatives measurements, see the article on [[Missing Zyklon B derivatives in claimed homicidal gas chamber walls argument]]).
Line 106:		Line 106:
	The [[Communist]] [[Soviet Union]] since its creation routinely falsified history using a variety of sophisticated methods. Even non-revisionists now admit that the Soviet [[Extraordinary State Commission]] during and after the war "conspired" and falsely blamed Germans for various crimes in their reports. See the article on the [[Extraordinary State Commission]].		The [[Communist]] [[Soviet Union]] since its creation routinely falsified history using a variety of sophisticated methods. Even non-revisionists now admit that the Soviet [[Extraordinary State Commission]] during and after the war "conspired" and falsely blamed Germans for various crimes in their reports. See the article on the [[Extraordinary State Commission]].

	A common [[straw man]] is to state that revisionists argue that everything is part of an exclusively ~~Jewish~~ and carefully planned conspiracy. As noted in the article [[Holocaust motivations]], revisionists have instead argued that there were and are many different parties who would have had or have an in interest in supporting Holocaust propaganda, for variety of different reasons. An especially important Holocaust propaganda producer is often argued to have been [[Stalin]]'s Soviet Union, despite the ~~Jewish~~ influence having been greatly reduced during the [[Great Purge]] before the war. Furthermore, all the Allies need not necessarily have planned the wartime propaganda together, but may instead have copied, imitated, and added to useful propaganda from other Allies without any central coordination.		A common [[straw man]] is to state that revisionists argue that everything is part of an exclusively jewish and carefully planned conspiracy. As noted in the article [[Holocaust motivations]], revisionists have instead argued that there were and are many different parties who would have had or have an in interest in supporting Holocaust propaganda, for variety of different reasons. An especially important Holocaust propaganda producer is often argued to have been [[Stalin]]'s Soviet Union, despite the jewish influence having been greatly reduced during the [[Great Purge]] before the war. Furthermore, all the Allies need not necessarily have planned the wartime propaganda together, but may instead have copied, imitated, and added to useful propaganda from other Allies without any central coordination.

	See the article [[Allied psychological warfare]] on topics such as secret Allied organizations engaged in "psychological warfare" and spreading propaganda, including [[black propaganda]].		See the article [[Allied psychological warfare]] on topics such as secret Allied organizations engaged in "psychological warfare" and spreading propaganda, including [[black propaganda]].
Line 128:		Line 128:

	=== Focus on persecutions both sides agree on ===		=== Focus on persecutions both sides agree on ===
	Another method is focusing on persecutions of ~~Jews~~ that also revisionists agree on, such as ~~Jews~~ being deported to the [[Holocaust camps]] and killings of some ~~Jews~~ by the [[Einsatzgruppen]], and misleadingly try give the impression that Holocaust revisionists deny these persecutions and/or that the existence of such persecutions necessarily prove the existence of genocidal killings.		Another method is focusing on persecutions of jews that also revisionists agree on, such as jews being deported to the [[Holocaust camps]] and killings of some jews by the [[Einsatzgruppen]], and misleadingly try give the impression that Holocaust revisionists deny these persecutions and/or that the existence of such persecutions necessarily prove the existence of genocidal killings.

	One example is by implying that Holocaust revisionists have criticized [[Anne Frank]]'s diary because Holocaust revisionists claim that Anne Frank, or ~~Jews~~ more generally, were not persecuted and not deported to camps, which is incorrect.		One example is by implying that Holocaust revisionists have criticized [[Anne Frank]]'s diary because Holocaust revisionists claim that Anne Frank, or jews more generally, were not persecuted and not deported to camps, which is incorrect.

	=== Focus on the Western Holocaust camps ===		=== Focus on the Western Holocaust camps ===