Confirmation holism - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.) who (.)\]\]" to ""

2024-02-20T02:07:51Z

Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.*) who (.*)\]\]" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 19 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is the view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. ~~It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]]~~ in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-09-12T22:35:18Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 12 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is ~~tbe~~ view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is the view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-09-08T20:54:05Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 8 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is ~~the~~ view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is tbe view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

WikiSysop: Text replacement - " The " to " the "

2023-02-27T10:04:51Z

Text replacement - " The " to " the "

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 27 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is ~~The~~ view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is the view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "]]]]" to "]]"

2023-02-14T21:19:22Z

Text replacement - "]]]]" to "]]"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 14 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is The view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is The view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "tbe" to "The"

2023-02-14T09:21:03Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "The"

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 14 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is ~~tbe~~ view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but ~~ratber~~ that only a set of statements (a whole [[~~tbeory~~]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[~~tbeory~~]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is The view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but raTher that only a set of statements (a whole [[Theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[Theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science"

2023-02-13T23:18:27Z

Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 13 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of ~~science~~\|philosophy of ~~science~~]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is tbe view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but ratber that only a set of statements (a whole [[tbeory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[tbeory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]\|philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]]]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is tbe view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but ratber that only a set of statements (a whole [[tbeory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[tbeory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-13T23:05:57Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 13 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of science\|philosophy of science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is ~~the~~ view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but ~~rather~~ that only a set of statements (a whole [[~~theory~~]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[~~theory~~]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of science\|philosophy of science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is tbe view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but ratber that only a set of statements (a whole [[tbeory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[tbeory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

2023-02-10T03:54:38Z

Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 9 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of science\|philosophy of science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is the view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but rather that only a set of statements (a whole theory) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical theory to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of science\|philosophy of science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is the view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but rather that only a set of statements (a whole [[theory]]) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical [[theory]] to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-06T11:37:45Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 6 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[Philosophy of science\|philosophy of science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is ~~tbe~~ view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but ~~ratber~~ that only a set of statements (a whole ~~tbeory~~) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical ~~tbeory~~ to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>		In [[Philosophy of science\|philosophy of science]], '''confirmation holism''', also called '''epistemological holism''', is the view that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by an empirical test, but rather that only a set of statements (a whole theory) can be so. It is attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine who motivated his holism through extending Pierre Duhem's problem of [[underdetermination]] in physical theory to all knowledge claims. <ref name="online text">W. V. O. Quine. '[[Philosophy:Two Dogmas of Empiricism\|Two Dogmas of Empiricism]].' ''The Philosophical Review'', 60 (1951), pp. 20–43. [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html online text]</ref><ref>Duhem, Pierre. ''The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory''. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1954.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Confirmation holism - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.*) who (.*)\]\]" to ""

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

WikiSysop: Text replacement - " The " to " the "

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "]]]]" to "]]"

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "tbe" to "The"

Bacchus: Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science"

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

Bacchus: Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.) who (.)\]\]" to ""