Daniel Goldhagen - Revision history

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe " to "the "

2024-04-28T23:25:09Z

Text replacement - "tbe " to "the "

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 28 April 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==		== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==
	The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing ~~tbe~~ Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>		The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>

	"At ~~tbe~~ [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between ~~tbe~~ parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until ~~tbe~~ latter part of 1941, ~~tbe~~ solution to ~~tbe~~ jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at ~~tbe~~ Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in ~~tbe~~ 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>		"At the [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>

	See also ~~tbe~~ article on [[Holohoax awareness]].		See also the article on [[Holohoax awareness]].

	== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==		== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==
	Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout ~~tbe~~ history of ~~tbe~~ Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to ~~tbe~~ persecution of ~~tbe~~ jews during World War II.		Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the jews during World War II.

	See also [[The Catholic Church and ~~tbe~~ Holohoax]].		See also [[The Catholic Church and the Holohoax]].

	== ''Worse Than War'' ==		== ''Worse Than War'' ==
Line 19:		Line 19:

	== External links ==		== External links ==
	*[https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426 Demonizing ~~tbe~~ Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism]		*[https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426 Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism]

	=== Article archives ===		=== Article archives ===

Bacchus: Text replacement - " the " to " tbe "

2024-04-26T17:08:09Z

Text replacement - " the " to " tbe "

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 26 April 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==		== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==
	The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing ~~the~~ Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>		The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing tbe Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>

	"At ~~the~~ [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between ~~the~~ parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until ~~the~~ latter part of 1941, ~~the~~ solution to ~~the~~ jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at ~~the~~ Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in ~~the~~ 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>		"At tbe [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between tbe parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until tbe latter part of 1941, tbe solution to tbe jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at tbe Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in tbe 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>

	See also ~~the~~ article on [[Holohoax awareness]].		See also tbe article on [[Holohoax awareness]].

	== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==		== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==
	Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout ~~the~~ history of ~~the~~ Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to ~~the~~ persecution of ~~the~~ jews during World War II.		Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout tbe history of tbe Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to tbe persecution of tbe jews during World War II.

	See also [[The Catholic Church and ~~the~~ Holohoax]].		See also [[The Catholic Church and tbe Holohoax]].

	== ''Worse Than War'' ==		== ''Worse Than War'' ==
Line 19:		Line 19:

	== External links ==		== External links ==
	*[https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426 Demonizing ~~the~~ Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism]		*[https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426 Demonizing tbe Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism]

	=== Article archives ===		=== Article archives ===

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[[a-z][a-z]\:(.*)\]\]" to ""

2024-02-28T23:16:29Z

Text replacement - "\[\[[a-z][a-z]\:(.*)\]\]" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 28 February 2024
Line 29:		Line 29:

	[[Category:Exterminationist Holohoax historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holohoax historians]]


	~~[[hu:Daniel Goldhagen]]~~
	~~[[es:Daniel Goldhagen]]~~

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[de:(.*)\]\]" to ""

2024-02-28T23:03:45Z

Text replacement - "\[\[de:(.*)\]\]" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 28 February 2024
Line 30:		Line 30:
	[[Category:Exterminationist Holohoax historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holohoax historians]]

	~~[[de:Goldhagen, Daniel]]~~
	[[hu:Daniel Goldhagen]]		[[hu:Daniel Goldhagen]]
	[[es:Daniel Goldhagen]]		[[es:Daniel Goldhagen]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T07:53:02Z

Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 24 February 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==		== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==
	The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[~~Holocaust~~]] and/or an ongoing ~~Holocaust~~. Also many non-[[~~Holocaust~~ revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>		The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>

	"At the [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist ~~Holocaust~~ experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of ~~Holocaust~~ experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of ~~Holocaust~~ Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>		"At the [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>

	See also the article on [[~~Holocaust~~ awareness]].		See also the article on [[Holohoax awareness]].

	== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==		== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==
	Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the jews during World War II.		Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the jews during World War II.

	See also [[The Catholic Church and the ~~Holocaust~~]].		See also [[The Catholic Church and the Holohoax]].

	== ''Worse Than War'' ==		== ''Worse Than War'' ==
Line 28:		Line 28:


	[[Category:Exterminationist ~~Holocaust~~ historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holohoax historians]]

	[[de:Goldhagen, Daniel]]		[[de:Goldhagen, Daniel]]
	[[hu:Daniel Goldhagen]]		[[hu:Daniel Goldhagen]]
	[[es:Daniel Goldhagen]]		[[es:Daniel Goldhagen]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category:(.)jews in(.)\]\]" to ""

2024-02-21T01:02:51Z

Text replacement - "\[\[Category:(.*)jews in(.*)\]\]" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 20 February 2024
Line 27:		Line 27:


	~~[[Category:jews in the United States]]~~
	[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

2024-02-21T00:33:56Z

Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 20 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Daniel Johan Goldhagen''' (born 1959) is a [[~~Jewish~~]] historian and [[Zionist]].		'''Daniel Johan Goldhagen''' (born 1959) is a [[jewish]] historian and [[Zionist]].

	== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==		== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' ==
	The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holocaust]] and/or an ongoing Holocaust. Also many non-[[Holocaust revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>		The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holocaust]] and/or an ongoing Holocaust. Also many non-[[Holocaust revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref>

	"At the [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holocaust experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate ~~Jewry~~. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holocaust experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the ~~Jewish~~ question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holocaust Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>		"At the [[David Irving\|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holocaust experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holocaust experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holocaust Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref>

	See also the article on [[Holocaust awareness]].		See also the article on [[Holocaust awareness]].

	== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==		== ''A Moral Reckoning'' ==
	Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the ~~Jews~~ during World War II.		Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the jews during World War II.

	See also [[The Catholic Church and the Holocaust]].		See also [[The Catholic Church and the Holocaust]].
Line 27:		Line 27:


	[[Category:~~Jews~~ in the United States]]		[[Category:jews in the United States]]
	[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Categoryxxx" to ""

2024-02-08T05:24:18Z

Text replacement - "Categoryxxx" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 7 February 2024
Line 26:		Line 26:
	{{references}}		{{references}}

	~~[[Categoryxxx]]~~
	[[Category:Jews in the United States]]		[[Category:Jews in the United States]]
	[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Category:([0-9]*) births" to "Categoryxxx"

2024-02-06T09:47:30Z

Text replacement - "Category:([0-9]*) births" to "Categoryxxx"

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 6 February 2024
Line 26:		Line 26:
	{{references}}		{{references}}

	[[~~Category:1959 births~~]]		[[Categoryxxx]]
	[[Category:Jews in the United States]]		[[Category:Jews in the United States]]
	[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]		[[Category:Exterminationist Holocaust historians]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: 1 revision imported

2024-02-04T03:43:43Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:43, 3 February 2024
(No difference)