Divine command theory - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-09-12T22:00:55Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 12 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. ~~tbe~~ [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~tbe~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. the [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~tbe~~ [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~tbe~~ [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are ~~tbe~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of the [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of the [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are the source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~tbe~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at the Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-09-08T19:34:20Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 8 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. ~~the~~ [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~the~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. tbe [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted tbe importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~the~~ [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~the~~ [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are ~~the~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of tbe [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of tbe [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are tbe source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~the~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at tbe Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.

WikiSysop: Text replacement - " The " to " the "

2023-02-27T08:37:02Z

Text replacement - " The " to " the "

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 26 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. ~~The~~ [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~The~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. the [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~The~~ [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~The~~ [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are ~~The~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of the [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of the [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are the source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~The~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at the Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "tbe" to "The"

2023-02-14T17:25:23Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "The"

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 14 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command [[~~tbeory~~]]''' (also known as '''~~tbeological~~ voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval ~~tbeological~~ voluntarism and ~~tbeological~~ voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[~~tbeory~~]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to ~~whetber~~ it is commanded by [[God]]. The [[~~tbeory~~]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both ~~monotbeistic~~ and ~~polytbeistic~~ religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~tbe~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command [[Theory]]''' (also known as '''Theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval Theological voluntarism and Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[Theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to wheTher it is commanded by [[God]]. The [[Theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monoTheistic and polyTheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted The importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~tbe~~ [[~~tbeory~~]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[~~tbeory~~]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[~~tbeory~~]]" based on ~~tbe omnibenevolence of~~ God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~tbe~~ [[~~tbeory~~]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[~~tbeory~~]] proposes that God's motivations, ~~ratber~~ than commands, are ~~tbe~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of The [[Theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[Theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[Theory]]" based on The omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of The [[Theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[Theory]] proposes that God's motivations, raTher than commands, are The source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~tbe~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at The Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.


Line 51:		Line 51:


	Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command [[~~tbeory~~]].		Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command [[Theory]].

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-13T21:55:34Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 13 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command [[~~theory~~]]''' (also known as '''~~theological~~ voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval ~~theological~~ voluntarism and ~~theological~~ voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[~~theory~~]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to ~~whether~~ it is commanded by [[God]]. The [[~~theory~~]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both ~~monotheistic~~ and ~~polytheistic~~ religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~the~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command [[tbeory]]''' (also known as '''tbeological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval tbeological voluntarism and tbeological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[tbeory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whetber it is commanded by [[God]]. The [[tbeory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotbeistic and polytbeistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted tbe importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~the~~ [[~~theory~~]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[~~theory~~]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[~~theory~~]]" based on ~~the omnibenevolence of~~ God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~the~~ [[~~theory~~]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[~~theory~~]] proposes that God's motivations, ~~rather~~ than commands, are ~~the~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of tbe [[tbeory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[tbeory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[tbeory]]" based on tbe omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of tbe [[tbeory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[tbeory]] proposes that God's motivations, ratber than commands, are tbe source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~the~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at tbe Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.


Line 51:		Line 51:


	Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command [[~~theory~~]].		Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command [[tbeory]].

Bacchus: Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

2023-02-10T03:56:18Z

Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:56, 9 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command theory''' (also known as '''theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval theological voluntarism and theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-~~ethical theory~~ which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by [[God]]. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command [[theory]]''' (also known as '''theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval theological voluntarism and theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical [[theory]] which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by [[God]]. The [[theory]] asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of the theory have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command theory; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command theory" based on the omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of the theory from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation theory proposes that God's motivations, rather than commands, are the source of morality.		Numerous variants of the [[theory]] have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command [[theory]]; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command [[theory]]" based on the omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of the [[theory]] from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation [[theory]] proposes that God's motivations, rather than commands, are the source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 51:		Line 51:


	Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command theory.		Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command [[theory]].

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-06T20:12:56Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 6 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command ~~tbeory~~''' (also known as '''~~tbeological~~ voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval ~~tbeological~~ voluntarism and ~~tbeological~~ voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-~~ethical tbeory~~ which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to ~~whetber~~ it is commanded by [[God]]. The ~~tbeory~~ asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both ~~monotbeistic~~ and ~~polytbeistic~~ religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~tbe~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command theory''' (also known as '''theological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval theological voluntarism and theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by [[God]]. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~tbe tbeory~~ have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command ~~tbeory~~; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command ~~tbeory~~" based on ~~tbe omnibenevolence of~~ God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~tbe tbeory~~ from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation ~~tbeory~~ proposes that God's motivations, ~~ratber~~ than commands, are ~~tbe~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of the theory have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command theory; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command theory" based on the omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of the theory from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation theory proposes that God's motivations, rather than commands, are the source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~tbe~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at the Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.


Line 51:		Line 51:


	Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command ~~tbeory~~.		Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command theory.

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-05T07:59:59Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 4 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	'''Divine command ~~theory~~''' (also known as '''~~theological~~ voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval ~~theological~~ voluntarism and ~~theological~~ voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-~~ethical theory~~ which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to ~~whether~~ it is commanded by [[God]]. The ~~theory~~ asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both ~~monotheistic~~ and ~~polytheistic~~ religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted ~~the~~ importance of God's commands in establishing morality.		'''Divine command tbeory''' (also known as '''tbeological voluntarism''')<ref>Theological Voluntarism — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref><ref>Not to be confused with medieval tbeological voluntarism and tbeological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy.</ref> is a meta-ethical tbeory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whetber it is commanded by [[God]]. The tbeory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotbeistic and polytbeistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted tbe importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

	==Variants==		==Variants==
	Numerous variants of ~~the theory~~ have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command ~~theory~~; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command ~~theory~~" based on ~~the omnibenevolence of~~ God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of ~~the theory~~ from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation ~~theory~~ proposes that God's motivations, ~~rather~~ than commands, are ~~the~~ source of morality.		Numerous variants of tbe tbeory have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard have presented various versions of divine command tbeory; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adamshas proposed a "modified divine command tbeory" based on tbe omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of tbe tbeory from a [[Christian]] viewpoint, and Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski's divine motivation tbeory proposes that God's motivations, ratber than commands, are tbe source of morality.

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==
Line 33:		Line 33:


	Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at ~~the~~ Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.		Kowalski, Dean (2011). Moral Theory at tbe Movies: An Introduction to Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-44221-455-2.


Line 51:		Line 51:


	Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command ~~theory~~.		Quinn, Philip (2000). The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers. Divine command tbeory.

Deleted User: Text replacement - "|[[Category:" to "[[Category:"

2023-01-13T11:22:12Z

Text replacement - "|[[Category:" to "[[Category:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 13 January 2023
Line 70:		Line 70:
	==References==		==References==

	\|[[Category:Religion]]		[[Category:Religion]]

Deleted User: Text replacement - "[[Category:" to "|[[Category:"

2023-01-12T14:28:42Z

Text replacement - "[[Category:" to "|[[Category:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 12 January 2023
Line 70:		Line 70:
	==References==		==References==

	[[Category:Religion]]		\|[[Category:Religion]]