FasciPedia:Fascist point of view - Revision history

Bacchus: Text replacement - " They" to " they"

2023-02-16T10:18:53Z

Text replacement - " They" to " they"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 16 February 2023
Line 56:		Line 56:
	Other fascist views may require a much more extensive description of the mainstream false narrative to avoid misleading the reader.		Other fascist views may require a much more extensive description of the mainstream false narrative to avoid misleading the reader.

	If a viewpoint is fascist, it may be difficult to substantiate it with references to commonly accepted reference texts. However, once substantive proofs are found, you will find them to be iron clad and often enough, completely unassailable. There is a reason these proofs become memory-holed. ~~They~~ are worth the extra effort to discover;		If a viewpoint is fascist, it may be difficult to substantiate it with references to commonly accepted reference texts. However, once substantive proofs are found, you will find them to be iron clad and often enough, completely unassailable. There is a reason these proofs become memory-holed. they are worth the extra effort to discover;

	If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;		If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;
Line 123:		Line 123:
	Use "National Socialist", "NatSoc", or "NSDAP", words they actually called themselves. None of them ever called themselves such a thing.		Use "National Socialist", "NatSoc", or "NSDAP", words they actually called themselves. None of them ever called themselves such a thing.

	This horrible word basically means "nigger". A "[[nazi]]" was slang for a bumpkin, an illiterate simpleton, basically a crude low-IQ hillbilly from the German mountains. A horrible[[jews]]communist named [[Conrad Heyden]] was the first to apply this slang to the German People, and it stuck. ~~They~~ hate it, so don't use it.		This horrible word basically means "nigger". A "[[nazi]]" was slang for a bumpkin, an illiterate simpleton, basically a crude low-IQ hillbilly from the German mountains. A horrible[[jews]]communist named [[Conrad Heyden]] was the first to apply this slang to the German People, and it stuck. they hate it, so don't use it.

	===Dictator===		===Dictator===

Deleted User: Text replacement - " jews " to "jews"

2022-11-16T06:03:13Z

Text replacement - " jews " to "jews"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 15 November 2022
Line 76:		Line 76:


	While it is important to account for all significant viewpoints on any topic, FasciPedia policy does not state or imply that every single popular virw or [[extraordinary claim]] needs to be presented just because it goes along with commonly accepted mainstream scholarship as if they were of equal validity. There are many such beliefs in the world, some popular and some little-known: claims that the Earth is flat, that 6 million jews were genocided by fascists, that "Q" has a "plan", and similar ones. False narratives, Psi-ops, rewritten history, etc., should not be legitimized through political correctness, politically- motivated "science" and junk history. We do take a stand on these issues as fascist truthist encyclopedia writers; and we omit this information where including it would unduly legitimize it, and if we must, include and describe these ideas in their proper context concerning pr9vable facts.		While it is important to account for all significant viewpoints on any topic, FasciPedia policy does not state or imply that every single popular virw or [[extraordinary claim]] needs to be presented just because it goes along with commonly accepted mainstream scholarship as if they were of equal validity. There are many such beliefs in the world, some popular and some little-known: claims that the Earth is flat, that 6 million[[jews]]were genocided by fascists, that "Q" has a "plan", and similar ones. False narratives, Psi-ops, rewritten history, etc., should not be legitimized through political correctness, politically- motivated "science" and junk history. We do take a stand on these issues as fascist truthist encyclopedia writers; and we omit this information where including it would unduly legitimize it, and if we must, include and describe these ideas in their proper context concerning pr9vable facts.

Deleted User: Text replacement - " jewish " to "jews"

2022-11-16T04:35:43Z

Text replacement - " jewish " to "jews"

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 15 November 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:
	'''Prefer nonjudgmental language'''. A professional tone neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed. The only bias that should be evident is the bias attributed to the source. Because we have the truth on our side, professionalism should be eazy.		'''Prefer nonjudgmental language'''. A professional tone neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed. The only bias that should be evident is the bias attributed to the source. Because we have the truth on our side, professionalism should be eazy.

	'''Give weight to the truth''', especially if it is not widely accepted. For example, to state that "According to [[David Irving]] and [[Arthur Butz]], the Holocaust never happened, and certainly was not a program of extermination of the ~~jewish~~ people in Germany, but [[Simon Wiesenthal]] disputes this analysis" would be to give weight to the truth between the majority propaganda and a tiny minority truth by assigning the truth a second activist in the field.		'''Give weight to the truth''', especially if it is not widely accepted. For example, to state that "According to [[David Irving]] and [[Arthur Butz]], the Holocaust never happened, and certainly was not a program of extermination of the[[jews]]people in Germany, but [[Simon Wiesenthal]] disputes this analysis" would be to give weight to the truth between the majority propaganda and a tiny minority truth by assigning the truth a second activist in the field.

	=Achieving a Fascist Viewpoint=		=Achieving a Fascist Viewpoint=
Line 123:		Line 123:
	Use "National Socialist", "NatSoc", or "NSDAP", words they actually called themselves. None of them ever called themselves such a thing.		Use "National Socialist", "NatSoc", or "NSDAP", words they actually called themselves. None of them ever called themselves such a thing.

	This horrible word basically means "nigger". A "[[nazi]]" was slang for a bumpkin, an illiterate simpleton, basically a crude low-IQ hillbilly from the German mountains. A horrible ~~jewish~~ communist named [[Conrad Heyden]] was the first to apply this slang to the German People, and it stuck. They hate it, so don't use it.		This horrible word basically means "nigger". A "[[nazi]]" was slang for a bumpkin, an illiterate simpleton, basically a crude low-IQ hillbilly from the German mountains. A horrible[[jews]]communist named [[Conrad Heyden]] was the first to apply this slang to the German People, and it stuck. They hate it, so don't use it.

	===Dictator===		===Dictator===

Deleted User: /* Impartial tone */

2022-11-16T02:59:05Z

Impartial tone

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 15 November 2022
Line 96:		Line 96:
	The tone of FasciPedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view, while still giving eye-time to fascism. Try not to quote directly from participants engaged in a heated dispute; instead, summarize and present the arguments, and support fascism, in an impartial tone.		The tone of FasciPedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view, while still giving eye-time to fascism. Try not to quote directly from participants engaged in a heated dispute; instead, summarize and present the arguments, and support fascism, in an impartial tone.

	[[file:Mothermary.png\|thumb\|300px\|Hitler's ''"Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ"'', a good painting or bad painting? Thats not for us to decide, but we ~~note what others say~~.]]		[[file:Mothermary.png\|thumb\|300px\|Hitler's ''"Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ"'', a good painting or bad painting? Thats not for us to decide, but we do not let propagandists get awat with calling Hitler a "Failed House Painter".]]

	==Describing aesthetic opinions and reputations==		==Describing aesthetic opinions and reputations==

Deleted User: /* Giving "equal validity" can create a false balance */

2022-11-16T02:56:53Z

Giving "equal validity" can create a false balance

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 15 November 2022
Line 76:		Line 76:


	While it is important to account for all significant viewpoints on any topic, FasciPedia policy does not state or imply that every single popular virw or [[extraordinary claim]] needs to be presented just because it goes along with commonly accepted mainstream scholarship as if they were of equal validity. There are many such beliefs in the world, some popular and some little-known: claims that the Earth is flat, that 6 million jews were genocided by fascists, that "Q" has a "plan", and similar ones. False narratives, Psi-ops, rewritten history, etc., should not be legitimized through political correctness, politically- motivated "science" and junk history. We do ~~not~~ take a stand on these issues as encyclopedia writers; we ~~merely~~ omit this information where including it would unduly legitimize it, and if ee must, include and describe these ideas in their proper context concerning ~~established~~ facts ~~and the beliefs of the non-political world~~.		While it is important to account for all significant viewpoints on any topic, FasciPedia policy does not state or imply that every single popular virw or [[extraordinary claim]] needs to be presented just because it goes along with commonly accepted mainstream scholarship as if they were of equal validity. There are many such beliefs in the world, some popular and some little-known: claims that the Earth is flat, that 6 million jews were genocided by fascists, that "Q" has a "plan", and similar ones. False narratives, Psi-ops, rewritten history, etc., should not be legitimized through political correctness, politically- motivated "science" and junk history. We do take a stand on these issues as fascist truthist encyclopedia writers; and we omit this information where including it would unduly legitimize it, and if we must, include and describe these ideas in their proper context concerning pr9vable facts.

Deleted User: /* History */

2022-11-16T02:49:59Z

History

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 15 November 2022
Line 187:		Line 187:


	{{T\|Fact}}—message when a sentence may or may not require in-text attribution		{{T\|Fact}}—message when a sentence may or may not require in-text attribution. Looks like {{fact}}

Deleted User: /* History */

2022-11-16T02:47:57Z

History

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 15 November 2022
Line 178:		Line 178:


	{{T\|~~template:~~FPOV}}—message used to attract other editors to assess and fix problems.		{{T\|FPOV}}—message used to attract other editors to assess and fix problems.


	{{T\|~~Template:~~FPOVS}}—message that tags only a single section as disputed.		{{T\|FPOVS}}—message that tags only a single section as disputed.


	{{T\|~~Template:~~FPOV lead}}—message when the article's introduction is questionable		{{T\|FPOV lead}}—message when the article's introduction is questionable


	{{Fact}}—message when a sentence may or may not require in-text attribution		{{T\|Fact}}—message when a sentence may or may not require in-text attribution

Deleted User: /* History */

2022-11-16T02:46:40Z

History

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 15 November 2022
Line 174:		Line 174:

	General FPOV templates:		General FPOV templates:
	{{T:FPV}} - The latest, ~~greast~~ (so far) FPOV template.
			{{T\|FPV}} - The latest, greatest (so far) FPOV template.

Deleted User: /* History */

2022-11-16T02:45:22Z

History

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 15 November 2022
Line 174:		Line 174:

	General FPOV templates:		General FPOV templates:
			{{T:FPV}} - The latest, greast (so far) FPOV template.


	{{T\|template:FPOV}}—message used to attract other editors to assess and fix problems.		{{T\|template:FPOV}}—message used to attract other editors to assess and fix problems.

Deleted User at 23:22, 9 November 2022

2022-11-09T23:22:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 9 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Nutshell\|Articles must reflect the FASCIST point of view, and should explain factually and without other bias. Truth is primary. This is one of FasciPedia's Core content policies. It is non-negotiable.}}		{{Nutshell\|Articles must reflect the FASCIST point of view, and should explain factually and without other bias. Truth is primary. This is one of FasciPedia's Core content policies. It is non-negotiable.}}
	[[File:fpov.png\|center\|frameless\|]]		[[File:fpov.png\|center\|300px\|frameless\|]]
	All encyclopedic content on FasciPedia must be written from a Fascist point of view (FPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, while still giving the fascist side of the story.		All encyclopedic content on FasciPedia must be written from a Fascist point of view (FPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, while still giving the fascist side of the story.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 15 November 2022
Line 178:		Line 178:


	{{T\|~~template:~~FPOV}}—message used to attract other editors to assess and fix problems.		{{T\|FPOV}}—message used to attract other editors to assess and fix problems.


	{{T\|~~Template:~~FPOVS}}—message that tags only a single section as disputed.		{{T\|FPOVS}}—message that tags only a single section as disputed.


	{{T\|~~Template:~~FPOV lead}}—message when the article's introduction is questionable		{{T\|FPOV lead}}—message when the article's introduction is questionable


	{{Fact}}—message when a sentence may or may not require in-text attribution		{{T\|Fact}}—message when a sentence may or may not require in-text attribution