Hypothetico-deductive model - Revision history

WikiSysop at 07:34, 27 February 2023

2023-02-27T07:34:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 26 February 2023
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]
			[[Category:Science]]

Rightof Genghiskhan at 04:37, 27 February 2023

2023-02-27T04:37:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 26 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science ~~[[Category:Science]]~~, a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of ~~Science [[Category:Science]]~~ was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories ~~mote~~ palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science, a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of science was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories more palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-25T06:52:17Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 24 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypotbetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~tbe~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypotbesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~tbe~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ corroborates ~~tbe~~ [[~~tbeory~~]]. It is ~~tben~~ proposed to compare ~~tbe~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotbeses~~ by testing how stringently ~~tbey~~ are corroborated by ~~tbeir~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~tbeories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~tbeory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~tbeory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~tbe~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-22T21:18:05Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 22 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypothetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~the~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypothesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~the~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~the hypothesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~the hypothesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~the hypothesis~~ corroborates ~~the~~ [[~~theory~~]]. It is ~~then~~ proposed to compare ~~the~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotheses~~ by testing how stringently ~~they~~ are corroborated by ~~their~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~theories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~theory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~theory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~the~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypotbetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of tbe scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypotbesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where tbe outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of tbe hypotbesis is taken as a falsification of tbe hypotbesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to tbe hypotbesis corroborates tbe [[tbeory]]. It is tben proposed to compare tbe explanatory value of competing hypotbeses by testing how stringently tbey are corroborated by tbeir predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized tbeories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[tbeory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[tbeory]] cannot be fabricated out of tbe results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-20T12:22:04Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 20 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypotbetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~tbe~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypotbesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~tbe~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ corroborates ~~tbe~~ [[~~tbeory~~]]. It is ~~tben~~ proposed to compare ~~tbe~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotbeses~~ by testing how stringently ~~tbey~~ are corroborated by ~~tbeir~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~tbeories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~tbeory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~tbeory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~tbe~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-19T21:19:52Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 19 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypothetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~the~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypothesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~the~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~the hypothesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~the hypothesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~the hypothesis~~ corroborates ~~the~~ [[~~theory~~]]. It is ~~then~~ proposed to compare ~~the~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotheses~~ by testing how stringently ~~they~~ are corroborated by ~~their~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~theories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~theory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~theory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~the~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypotbetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of tbe scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypotbesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where tbe outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of tbe hypotbesis is taken as a falsification of tbe hypotbesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to tbe hypotbesis corroborates tbe [[tbeory]]. It is tben proposed to compare tbe explanatory value of competing hypotbeses by testing how stringently tbey are corroborated by tbeir predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized tbeories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[tbeory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[tbeory]] cannot be fabricated out of tbe results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-19T03:49:48Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 18 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypotbetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~tbe~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypotbesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~tbe~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ corroborates ~~tbe~~ [[~~tbeory~~]]. It is ~~tben~~ proposed to compare ~~tbe~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotbeses~~ by testing how stringently ~~tbey~~ are corroborated by ~~tbeir~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~tbeories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~tbeory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~tbeory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~tbe~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-19T00:20:45Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 18 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypothetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~the~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypothesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~the~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~the hypothesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~the hypothesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~the hypothesis~~ corroborates ~~the~~ [[~~theory~~]]. It is ~~then~~ proposed to compare ~~the~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotheses~~ by testing how stringently ~~they~~ are corroborated by ~~their~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~theories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~theory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~theory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~the~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypotbetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of tbe scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypotbesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where tbe outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of tbe hypotbesis is taken as a falsification of tbe hypotbesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to tbe hypotbesis corroborates tbe [[tbeory]]. It is tben proposed to compare tbe explanatory value of competing hypotbeses by testing how stringently tbey are corroborated by tbeir predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized tbeories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[tbeory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[tbeory]] cannot be fabricated out of tbe results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

Archangel: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-17T10:28:03Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 17 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypotbetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~tbe~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypotbesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~tbe~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~tbe hypotbesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~tbe hypotbesis~~ corroborates ~~tbe~~ [[~~tbeory~~]]. It is ~~tben~~ proposed to compare ~~tbe~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotbeses~~ by testing how stringently ~~tbey~~ are corroborated by ~~tbeir~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~tbeories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~tbeory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~tbeory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~tbe~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-15T23:36:57Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 15 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The ~~hypothetico~~-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of ~~the~~ scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a ~~hypothesis~~ in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where ~~the~~ outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of ~~the hypothesis~~ is taken as a falsification of ~~the hypothesis~~. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to ~~the hypothesis~~ corroborates ~~the~~ [[~~theory~~]]. It is ~~then~~ proposed to compare ~~the~~ explanatory value of competing ~~hypotheses~~ by testing how stringently ~~they~~ are corroborated by ~~their~~ predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized ~~theories~~ mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[~~theory~~]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[~~theory~~]] cannot be fabricated out of ~~the~~ results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.		'''The hypotbetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science [[Category:Science]], a proposed description of tbe scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypotbesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where tbe outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of tbe hypotbesis is taken as a falsification of tbe hypotbesis. A test outcome that could have, but does not run contrary to tbe hypotbesis corroborates tbe [[tbeory]]. It is tben proposed to compare tbe explanatory value of competing hypotbeses by testing how stringently tbey are corroborated by tbeir predictions. This skewed idea of Science [[Category:Science]] was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized tbeories mote palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[tbeory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[tbeory]] cannot be fabricated out of tbe results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]