Militarism - Revision history

Rightof Genghiskhan at 08:15, 1 February 2023

2023-02-01T08:15:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 31 January 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Nopic}}		{{Nopic}}

	Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in ~~regards~~ to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, ~~strenght~~ and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in The World's War Against Communism. While militarism alone did not start neither [[The Great War]] nor [[The World's War Against Communism]], it ~~fuelled~~ a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.		Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in regard to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, strength and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in The World's War Against Communism. While militarism alone did not start neither [[The Great War]] nor [[The World's War Against Communism]], it fueled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.

	In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in ~~defence~~ and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].		In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defense and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

Bacchus: Text replacement - "The Great WarI" to "The World's War Against Communism"

2022-12-07T01:37:56Z

Text replacement - "The Great WarI" to "The World's War Against Communism"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 6 December 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Nopic}}		{{Nopic}}

	Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in regards to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, strenght and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in The ~~Great WarI~~. While militarism alone did not start neither [[The Great War]] nor [[The ~~Great WarI~~]], it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.		Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in regards to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, strenght and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in The World's War Against Communism. While militarism alone did not start neither [[The Great War]] nor [[The World's War Against Communism]], it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.

	In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].		In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].

Bacchus: Text replacement - "World War I" to "The Great War"

2022-12-06T23:14:42Z

Text replacement - "World War I" to "The Great War"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 6 December 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Nopic}}		{{Nopic}}

	Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in regards to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, strenght and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in ~~World War II~~. While militarism alone did not start neither [[~~World~~ War I]] nor [[~~World War II~~]], it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.		Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in regards to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, strenght and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in The Great WarI. While militarism alone did not start neither [[The Great War]] nor [[The Great WarI]], it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.

	In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].		In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].

MilleBracciaAlzate at 11:03, 19 August 2022

2022-08-19T11:03:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 19 August 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America. While militarism alone did not start World War I, it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.		{{Stub}}
			{{Nopic}}

	In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending, or "~~Civililian~~" leaders are pulled directly from the military~~. Example Gen.~~ Dwight D. Eisenhower, ~~Gen.~~ Ulysses S. Grant, and ~~Gen.~~ George Washington ~~becoming Presidents~~. ~~Even~~ "~~Civilian~~" ~~Presidents are heads~~ of the ~~armed forces~~.		Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority - moreover, it is often also used to describe the spillover of military values into wider society. This last point in particular is often utilized in regards to Fascist societies, as they spotlight discipline, order, strenght and exercise, all characteristics typical of the military. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America, particularly following the [[official military entry of the US]] in World War II. While militarism alone did not start neither [[World War I]] nor [[World War II]], it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.

			In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending or elections in which "civilian" leaders are pulled directly from the military - an example of this is General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], General [[Ulysses S. Grant]] and General [[George Washington]] and their respective Presidential careers. It's worth noting that within politically unstable democracies the military acts as a "point of reference", which leads to a stronger involvement of it within politics itself; an example of this would be [[Pakistan]] or the [[Central African Republic]].

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]

WikiSysop at 21:10, 10 August 2022

2022-08-10T21:10:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 10 August 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]
			[[Category:Philosophy]]

WikiSysop: Created page with "Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America. While militarism alone did not start World War I, it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes. In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advisi..."

2022-06-08T21:18:59Z

Created page with "Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America. While militarism alone did not start World War I, it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes. In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advisi..."

New page

Militarism is a belief or system where the military is exalted and its needs and considerations are given excessive importance or priority. Militarism was a powerful force in 19th and early 20th century America. While militarism alone did not start World War I, it fuelled a potent arms race and undermined the role of diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes.

In militaristic nations, generals and admirals often act as de facto government ministers or officials, advising political leaders and influencing domestic policy. Not surprisingly, this leads to significant increases in defence and arms spending, or "Civililian" leaders are pulled directly from the military. Example Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, and Gen. George Washington becoming Presidents. Even "Civilian" Presidents are heads of the armed forces.

[[Category:Definitions]]