Opinion - 1. Revisionism - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T10:19:03Z

Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 25 February 2024
Line 28:		Line 28:
	''Admin Note:		''Admin Note:
	''		''
	I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind '~~Holocaust~~ Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the ~~Holocaust~~? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized jews.		I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holohoax Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holohoax? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized jews.

	Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.		Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.
Line 35:		Line 35:

	But, hang on, hang on.		But, hang on, hang on.
	We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50 cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to ~~Holocaust~~ class?		We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50 cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holohoax class?

	C'mon. That's just silly.		C'mon. That's just silly.
Line 42:		Line 42:


	Historical Revisionism, including ~~Holocaust~~ Revisionism, is ''a perfectly legitimate'', respectable, decent, moral, upstanding study to pursue.		Historical Revisionism, including Holohoax Revisionism, is ''a perfectly legitimate'', respectable, decent, moral, upstanding study to pursue.


Line 54:		Line 54:
	[[Category:Opinion]]		[[Category:Opinion]]
	[[Category:Francis_"Moggy"_Meyrick]]		[[Category:Francis_"Moggy"_Meyrick]]
	[[Category:FMM-~~Holocaust~~]]		[[Category:FMM-Holohoax]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

2023-10-16T06:36:54Z

Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 15 October 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	''Admin Note:		''Admin Note:
	''		''
	I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized ~~Jews~~.		I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized jews.

	Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.		Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Reverted edits by Rightof Genghiskhan (talk) to last revision by Bacchus

2023-03-07T07:04:50Z

Reverted edits by Rightof Genghiskhan (talk) to last revision by Bacchus

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 6 March 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.		theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.
	By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.		By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.
	Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories and be confident that we are approaching the truth.		Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.
	The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:		The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:

Rightof Genghiskhan at 06:15, 7 March 2023

2023-03-07T06:15:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 6 March 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.		theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.
	By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.		By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.
	Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.		Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories and be confident that we are approaching the truth.
	The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:		The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:

Bacchus: Reverted edits by Rightof Genghiskhan (talk) to last revision by Francis Meyrick

2023-02-07T00:19:43Z

Reverted edits by Rightof Genghiskhan (talk) to last revision by Francis Meyrick

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 6 February 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:

	{{Rquote\|center\|"The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means ''to view again''. The revision of long-held		{{Rquote\|center\|"The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means ''to view again''. The revision of long-held
	theories ~~are~~ entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.		theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.
	By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.		By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.
	Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories and be confident that we are approaching the truth.		Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.
	The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:		The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:

Line 28:		Line 28:
	''Admin Note:		''Admin Note:
	''		''
	I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized Jews.		I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized Jews.

	Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.		Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.
Line 34:		Line 34:
	They dress it up very nicely.		They dress it up very nicely.

	But hang on, hang on.		But, hang on, hang on.
	We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50-cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holocaust class?		We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50 cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holocaust class?

	C'mon. That's just silly.		C'mon. That's just silly.

Rightof Genghiskhan at 04:45, 6 February 2023

2023-02-06T04:45:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 5 February 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:

	{{Rquote\|center\|"The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means ''to view again''. The revision of long-held		{{Rquote\|center\|"The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means ''to view again''. The revision of long-held
	theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.		theories are entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.
	By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.		By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.
	Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.		Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories and be confident that we are approaching the truth.
	The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:		The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once expressed it as follows:

Line 28:		Line 28:
	''Admin Note:		''Admin Note:
	''		''
	I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized Jews.		I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized Jews.

	Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.		Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.
Line 34:		Line 34:
	They dress it up very nicely.		They dress it up very nicely.

	But, hang on, hang on.		But hang on, hang on.
	We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50 cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holocaust class?		We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50-cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holocaust class?

	C'mon. That's just silly.		C'mon. That's just silly.

Francis Meyrick at 08:21, 15 January 2023

2023-01-15T08:21:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 14 January 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<gallery>
			File:90adbe907d257062.png\|Denial Laws
			File:1da0ae8a55c1ae90.png\|All jailed
			File:Article-8420361-29608804-87 636x637.png\|Illegal to hate
			File:7f4a44d57c4f19bd.png\| Say, what!?
			File:E0db408d6505aa24.png\| Ursula Haverbeck

			</gallery>
	[[File:On Revisionism.mp3\|left]]		[[File:On Revisionism.mp3\|left]]
	'''Opinion - 1.Revisionism'''		'''Opinion - 1.Revisionism'''

Francis Meyrick at 08:09, 15 January 2023

2023-01-15T08:09:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 14 January 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:


	{{Rquote\|center\|"The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means ''to view again''. The revision of long-held theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.		{{Rquote\|center\|"The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means ''to view again''. The revision of long-held
			theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of ''History'' belongs. Science is ''not'' a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for ''evidence''. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.
	By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.		By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or ''contradicts'' old theories; indeed, one of their ''obligations'' is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.
	Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.		Only in an '''open society''' in which individuals are '''free''' to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.

Francis Meyrick at 08:00, 15 January 2023

2023-01-15T08:00:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 14 January 2023
Line 27:		Line 27:
	But, hang on, hang on.		But, hang on, hang on.
	We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50 cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holocaust class?		We can ask questions about God, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, or, alternatively, depending on your tipple, even about Michelle Obama's biological sex? But, oh, woe betide you, if you bring a 50 cent pocket calculator (free with five gallons of gas) to Holocaust class?

	C'mon. That's just silly.		C'mon. That's just silly.

Francis Meyrick at 07:59, 15 January 2023

2023-01-15T07:59:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 14 January 2023
Line 20:		Line 20:
	''		''
	I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized Jews.		I am posting this, as it is becoming increasingly obvious, day by day, that the #TalmudicMafia, (incredibly well-funded, with a direct line to the Hundred Dollar bill printing press), is increasingly moving heaven & earth to portray 'Revisionism', and 'Historical Revisionism', (never mind 'Holocaust Revisionism'), as something ''inherently evil''. The argument is incessantly brought up that to ask even the most ''basic'' questions about the Holocaust? Is somehow 'disrespectful' to the suffering survivors. That it cruelly opens old wounds, and causes great anxiety and suffering among already traumatized Jews.

	Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.		Or even threatens their physical safety, if you believe the ADL.