Opinion - A fantastic, farcical ingredient - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T09:34:09Z

Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 25 February 2024
Line 15:		Line 15:


	There truly is a fantastic, farcical ingredient, to the way ~~Holocaust~~ numbers are 'calculated'.		There truly is a fantastic, farcical ingredient, to the way Holohoax numbers are 'calculated'.
	Maybe 'chucked merrily about' would be a better verb to use.		Maybe 'chucked merrily about' would be a better verb to use.
	Thus I have been quietly reading, and I'm struck by, firstly,		Thus I have been quietly reading, and I'm struck by, firstly,
Line 40:		Line 40:

	These two stalwart, much-feted, experts on the tiniest details, may be wholly relied upon, to have stated the solid facts with pin point accuracy.		These two stalwart, much-feted, experts on the tiniest details, may be wholly relied upon, to have stated the solid facts with pin point accuracy.
	So let's look at their respective figures for the location of ~~Holocaust~~ victims. The distribution per site. they are very close, as you will see below.		So let's look at their respective figures for the location of Holohoax victims. The distribution per site. they are very close, as you will see below.
	Not.		Not.
	(Figures are for Book 3 versus Book 4)		(Figures are for Book 3 versus Book 4)
Line 73:		Line 73:


	A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected ~~Holocaust~~ scholars, that the total jewish deaths in the ~~Holocaust~~ may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million jewish deaths. There is no problem.		A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holohoax scholars, that the total jewish deaths in the Holohoax may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million jewish deaths. There is no problem.

	or		or
Line 97:		Line 97:
	[[Category:Opinion]]		[[Category:Opinion]]
	[[Category:Francis_"Moggy"_Meyrick]]		[[Category:Francis_"Moggy"_Meyrick]]
	[[Category:FMM-~~Holocaust~~]]		[[Category:FMM-Holohoax]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

2023-10-16T05:24:15Z

Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

Bacchus: Text replacement - " They" to " they"

2023-02-16T12:22:53Z

Text replacement - " They" to " they"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 16 February 2023
Line 40:		Line 40:

	These two stalwart, much-feted, experts on the tiniest details, may be wholly relied upon, to have stated the solid facts with pin point accuracy.		These two stalwart, much-feted, experts on the tiniest details, may be wholly relied upon, to have stated the solid facts with pin point accuracy.
	So let's look at their respective figures for the location of Holocaust victims. The distribution per site. ~~They~~ are very close, as you will see below.		So let's look at their respective figures for the location of Holocaust victims. The distribution per site. they are very close, as you will see below.
	Not.		Not.
	(Figures are for Book 3 versus Book 4)		(Figures are for Book 3 versus Book 4)

Francis Meyrick at 03:32, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:32:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 28 January 2023
Line 90:		Line 90:

	Humbly,		Humbly,

			[[:Category:Francis "Moggy" Meyrick\|F.M.]]

	Moggy Meyrick)		Moggy Meyrick)

Francis Meyrick at 03:17, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:17:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 28 January 2023
Line 76:		Line 76:

	or		or


	B) These numbers show a wide-ranging divergency, bordering on the cock-a-mamie ludicrous. It's laughable. It is clear these guys are just sucking it out of their thumbs as they go along.		B) These numbers show a wide-ranging divergency, bordering on the cock-a-mamie ludicrous. It's laughable. It is clear these guys are just sucking it out of their thumbs as they go along.

Francis Meyrick at 03:16, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:16:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 28 January 2023
Line 74:		Line 74:

	A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holocaust scholars, that the total Jewish deaths in the Holocaust may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million Jewish deaths. There is no problem.		A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holocaust scholars, that the total Jewish deaths in the Holocaust may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million Jewish deaths. There is no problem.


	or		or

Francis Meyrick at 03:16, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:16:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 28 January 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	File:Scan.png\|IRC deaths breakdown		File:Scan.png\|IRC deaths breakdown
	File:01dbf8384a086529.png \|astonishing alchemy		File:01dbf8384a086529.png \|astonishing alchemy
	[[File:89f4f406979f71e0.png\|yes, we lied]]		File:89f4f406979f71e0.png\|yes, we lied
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Francis Meyrick at 03:15, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:15:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 28 January 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	File:Scan.png\|IRC deaths breakdown		File:Scan.png\|IRC deaths breakdown
	File:01dbf8384a086529.png \|astonishing alchemy		File:01dbf8384a086529.png \|astonishing alchemy
			[[File:89f4f406979f71e0.png\|yes, we lied]]
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Line 89:		Line 90:


	(I remain ~~however~~,		(I remain,

	Humbly,		Humbly,

Francis Meyrick at 03:09, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:09:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 28 January 2023
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Pah! No problem. Watch this:		Pah! No problem. Watch this:
	"Deaths at other locations"?		"Deaths at other locations"?
	2,515,000 versus 563,000 Book 3 is suddenly FIVE TIMES larger than Book 4...!		'''2,515,000 versus 563,000''' Book 3 is suddenly FIVE TIMES larger than Book 4...!
	Giving a grand total of:		Giving a grand total of:
	5,100,000 versus 5,933,000 (See? Magick! problem solved!)		'''5,100,000 versus 5,933,000''' (See? Magick! problem solved!)

	I invite the kind reader, in the privacy of his or her quiet mind, to study these numbers.		I invite the kind reader, in the privacy of his or her quiet mind, to study these numbers.

Francis Meyrick at 03:08, 29 January 2023

2023-01-29T03:08:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 15 October 2023
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Thus I have been quietly reading, and I'm struck by, firstly,		Thus I have been quietly reading, and I'm struck by, firstly,
	these two books.		these two books.
	Book 1) "The dissolution of Eastern European ~~Jewry~~" by Walter N. Sanning (1983)		Book 1) "The dissolution of Eastern European jewry" by Walter N. Sanning (1983)
	and		and
	Book 2) "Dimension des Volkermords" by Wolfgang Benz. (1991)		Book 2) "Dimension des Volkermords" by Wolfgang Benz. (1991)

	The first puts the 'unexplained Losses' of European ~~Jewry~~ at a total of 300,000.		The first puts the 'unexplained Losses' of European jewry at a total of 300,000.
	That kind of dovetails in with the (documented) International Red Cross figures of 271,301.		That kind of dovetails in with the (documented) International Red Cross figures of 271,301.
	The second book however? Puts the total at.... (wait for it, wait for it) (roll of the drums)		The second book however? Puts the total at.... (wait for it, wait for it) (roll of the drums)
	''Six Million ~~Jews~~.''		''Six Million jews.''
	Now, respectfully, unfortunately, my tongue stuck firmly in cheek?		Now, respectfully, unfortunately, my tongue stuck firmly in cheek?
	They cannot both be correct. The second number is TWENTY TIMES larger.		They cannot both be correct. The second number is TWENTY TIMES larger.

	The whole farce ("believe & mourn, or go-to-jail") becomes even more entertaining, when you put another two books together, side-by-side, both published by avowed members of the ~~Jewish~~ tribe.		The whole farce ("believe & mourn, or go-to-jail") becomes even more entertaining, when you put another two books together, side-by-side, both published by avowed members of the jewish tribe.
	Famed, as we all know, for their impartiality, freedom from prejudice, devoid of any agenda, and guaranteed to be careful, conscientious, historical researchers. Interested only in the facts.		Famed, as we all know, for their impartiality, freedom from prejudice, devoid of any agenda, and guaranteed to be careful, conscientious, historical researchers. Interested only in the facts.

	Book 3) "The destruction of the European ~~Jews~~" by world famous, highly decorated, la-di-dah Raoul Hilberg (2003)		Book 3) "The destruction of the European jews" by world famous, highly decorated, la-di-dah Raoul Hilberg (2003)

	and		and

	Book 4) "The war against the ~~Jews~~" by Lucy Dawidowicz.		Book 4) "The war against the jews" by Lucy Dawidowicz.

	These two stalwart, much-feted, experts on the tiniest details, may be wholly relied upon, to have stated the solid facts with pin point accuracy.		These two stalwart, much-feted, experts on the tiniest details, may be wholly relied upon, to have stated the solid facts with pin point accuracy.
Line 58:		Line 58:
	Total camp deaths 2,585,000 versus 5,370,000 DOUBLE (book 4 wins) (more than)		Total camp deaths 2,585,000 versus 5,370,000 DOUBLE (book 4 wins) (more than)

	But now you got a problem! What happened to the 'Six Million ~~Jews~~'? Oh-my-gosh. We've only got 2,585,000!!		But now you got a problem! What happened to the 'Six Million jews'? Oh-my-gosh. We've only got 2,585,000!!


Line 73:		Line 73:


	A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holocaust scholars, that the total ~~Jewish~~ deaths in the Holocaust may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million ~~Jewish~~ deaths. There is no problem.		A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holocaust scholars, that the total jewish deaths in the Holocaust may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million jewish deaths. There is no problem.

	or		or
Line 79:		Line 79:
	B) These numbers show a wide-ranging divergency, bordering on the cock-a-mamie ludicrous. It's laughable. It is clear these guys are just sucking it out of their thumbs as they go along.		B) These numbers show a wide-ranging divergency, bordering on the cock-a-mamie ludicrous. It's laughable. It is clear these guys are just sucking it out of their thumbs as they go along.
	In addition, Raoul Hilberg may be wined and dined in Jerusalem, but nobody can forget his screaming-plummeting demise in the Ernst Zundel trial in Canada.		In addition, Raoul Hilberg may be wined and dined in Jerusalem, but nobody can forget his screaming-plummeting demise in the Ernst Zundel trial in Canada.
	The whole 'six million ~~Jews~~' saga is so riddled with make-believe, hocus-pocus, and baloney, that nobody with an ounce of discretion, or bare double digits on the IQ scale?		The whole 'six million jews' saga is so riddled with make-believe, hocus-pocus, and baloney, that nobody with an ounce of discretion, or bare double digits on the IQ scale?

	Should take this tear-jerker, extortionist, play-for-sympathy, cods-whallop?		Should take this tear-jerker, extortionist, play-for-sympathy, cods-whallop?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 28 January 2023
Line 44:		Line 44:

	Auschwitz 1,000,000 versus 2,000,000 (double) (book 4 wins) (200%)		Auschwitz 1,000,000 versus 2,000,000 (double) (book 4 wins) (200%)

	Treblinka 800,000 versus 800,000 (0 %) (identical) (amazing) (maybe somebody peeked)		Treblinka 800,000 versus 800,000 (0 %) (identical) (amazing) (maybe somebody peeked)

	Belzec 435,000 versus 600,000 (138% larger) (book 4 wins)		Belzec 435,000 versus 600,000 (138% larger) (book 4 wins)

	Sobibor 150,000 versus 250,000 (166% larger) (book 4 wins)		Sobibor 150,000 versus 250,000 (166% larger) (book 4 wins)

	Chelmno 150,000 versus 340,000 (more than double bigger) (book 4 wins)		Chelmno 150,000 versus 340,000 (more than double bigger) (book 4 wins)

	Majdanek 50,000 versus 1,380,000 (EIGHTEEN TIMES larger) (1,800%) (book 4 wins)		Majdanek 50,000 versus 1,380,000 (EIGHTEEN TIMES larger) (1,800%) (book 4 wins)

	Total camp deaths 2,585,000 versus 5,370,000 DOUBLE (book 4 wins) (more than)		Total camp deaths 2,585,000 versus 5,370,000 DOUBLE (book 4 wins) (more than)

	But now you got a problem! What happened to the 'Six Million Jews'? Oh-my-gosh. We've only got 2,585,000!!		But now you got a problem! What happened to the 'Six Million Jews'? Oh-my-gosh. We've only got 2,585,000!!

Line 61:		Line 67:

	I invite the kind reader, in the privacy of his or her quiet mind, to study these numbers.		I invite the kind reader, in the privacy of his or her quiet mind, to study these numbers.


	I then invite you, respectfully, below, to record WHICH version of my summary YOU judge closer to the truth...? The polite, scholarly, academic one. Or t'other one.		I then invite you, respectfully, below, to record WHICH version of my summary YOU judge closer to the truth...? The polite, scholarly, academic one. Or t'other one.


	A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holocaust scholars, that the total Jewish deaths in the Holocaust may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million Jewish deaths. There is no problem.		A) These numbers show a broad consensus among two famed, well-respected Holocaust scholars, that the total Jewish deaths in the Holocaust may be accurately and reliably fixed at between five and six million Jewish deaths. There is no problem.


	or		or



	B) These numbers show a wide-ranging divergency, bordering on the cock-a-mamie ludicrous. It's laughable. It is clear these guys are just sucking it out of their thumbs as they go along.		B) These numbers show a wide-ranging divergency, bordering on the cock-a-mamie ludicrous. It's laughable. It is clear these guys are just sucking it out of their thumbs as they go along.