<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://fascipedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Principle_of_explosion</id>
	<title>Principle of explosion - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://fascipedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Principle_of_explosion"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fascipedia.org/index.php?title=Principle_of_explosion&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-08T15:53:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://fascipedia.org/index.php?title=Principle_of_explosion&amp;diff=15347&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bacchus: Created page with &quot;The principle of explosion is a logical rule of inference. According to the rule, from a set of premises in which a sentence &quot;'''''A'''''&quot; and its negation &quot;'''''-A'''''&quot; are both true (i.e., a contradiction is true), any sentence &quot;'''''B'''''&quot; may be inferred. It is also known by its Latin name ex contradictione quodlibet, meaning from a contradiction anything follows, or ECQ for short. Since a contradiction is always false, another Latin term is ex falso quodlibet....&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fascipedia.org/index.php?title=Principle_of_explosion&amp;diff=15347&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-01-20T07:58:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;The &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/Principle_of_explosion&quot; title=&quot;Principle of explosion&quot;&gt;principle of explosion&lt;/a&gt; is a logical rule of inference. According to the rule, from a set of premises in which a sentence &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;A&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot; and its negation &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-A&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot; are both true (i.e., a contradiction is true), any sentence &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot; may be inferred. It is also known by its Latin name ex contradictione quodlibet, meaning from a contradiction anything follows, or ECQ for short. Since a contradiction is always false, another Latin term is ex falso quodlibet....&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The [[principle of explosion]] is a logical rule of inference. According to the rule, from a set of premises in which a sentence &amp;quot;'''''A'''''&amp;quot; and its negation &amp;quot;'''''-A'''''&amp;quot; are both true (i.e., a contradiction is true), any sentence &amp;quot;'''''B'''''&amp;quot; may be inferred. It is also known by its Latin name ex contradictione quodlibet, meaning from a contradiction anything follows, or ECQ for short. Since a contradiction is always false, another Latin term is ex falso quodlibet. In layman's terms, if you start with two contradictory premises, you can actually deduce literally anything.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Classical logic]] accepts the principle of explosion; but in paraconsistent logic it is rejected. It is also rejected in [[relevance logic]], since relevance logic is based on the competing principle that the premises must be relevant to the conclusion. (All relevance logics are paraconsistent, but not all paraconsistent logics are relevant.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Definitions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Upgradable_definitions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bacchus</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>