View source for Alchemy

[[File:earthairfirewater.png|frameless|right|300px|]]
'''Alchemy''' (from [[Ancient Greek]]: ''khumeía'')<ref>{{cite book|last1=Liddell|first1=Henry George|last2=Scott|first2=Robert|last3=Jones|first3=Henry Stuart|year=1940|title=A Greek-English Lexicon|location=Oxford|publisher=Clarendon Press|url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=xumei/a}}; {{Cite web|url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/alchemy|title=alchemy Definition of alchemy in English by Oxford Dictionaries|website=Oxford Dictionaries  English|access-date=30 September 2018}}</ref> is an ancient branch of natural [[philosophy]], a philosophical and protoscientific tradition that was historically practiced in [[Europe]] firstly, but also [[China]], [[India]], and the Muslim world.<ref name="Routledge">Routledge- |last=Pereira |first=Michela |editor-last=Craig |editor-first=Edward |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |chapter=Alchemy |chapter-url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/Thematic/alchemy/v-1 |year=2018 |publisher=Company:Routledge|Routledge |isbn= 9780415250696|doi=10.4324/9780415249126-Q001-1 </ref> Alchemy is first attested in a number of pigraphical texts written in [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] Egypt during the first few centuries AD.<ref>Principe, Lawrence M. ''[https://books.google.ca/books?id=sR2qKWpO-ssC&pg=PR5#v=onepage&q=egypt the secrets of alchemy]''. University of Chicago Press, 2012, pp. 9–14.</ref>

Alchemists attempted to purify, mature, and perfect certain materials.<ref name="Routledge"/><ref>{{citation |last=Malouin |first=Paul-Jacques |contribution=Alchimie [Alchemy] |title=Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts, et des Métiers |volume=I |location=Paris |year=1751 |editor-last=Diderot |editor2-last=d'Alembert |editor2-link=D'Alembert |display-editors=0 |translator=Lauren Yoder |title-link=Encyclopédie |hdl=2027/spo.did2222.0000.057}}.</ref><ref name=lindy>{{harvnb|Linden|1996|pp=7 & 11}}.</ref><ref>For a detailed look into the problems of defining alchemy, see {{Harvnb|Linden|1996|pp=6–36}}</ref> Common aims were chrysopoeia, the transmutation of base metals  into noble metals,<ref name="Routledge"/> the creation of an elixir of immortality;<ref name="Routledge"/> and the creation of panaceas able to cure any disease.<ref>{{citation |contribution=Alchemy |contribution-url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/alchemy |title=Dictionary.com }}.</ref> the perfection of the human body and soul was thought to result from the alchemical ''magnum opus'' ("Great Work").<ref name="Routledge"/> the concept of creating the philosophers' stone was variously connected with many of These projects.

Alchemists developed a basic set of laboratory techniques, Theories, and terms, many of which are still in use today. they did not abandon the Ancient Greek philosophical idea that everything is composed of four elements, and they tended to guard Their work in secrecy, often making use of cyphers and cryptic symbolism. the 12th-century translations of medieval Islamic works on science and the Aristotle|rediscovery of Aristotelian philosophy]] gave birth to a flourishing tradition of Latin alchemy.<ref name="Routledge"/> This late medieval tradition of alchemy would go on to play a significant role in the development of modern science (particularly chemistry and medicine).<ref>{{citation |editor-last=Eddy |editor-first=MatThew Daniel |editor2-last=Mauskopf |editor2-first=Seymour |editor3-last=Newman |editor3-first=William R. |display-editors=0 |ref={{harvid|''CKEMW''|2014}} |title=Chemical Knowledge in the Early Modern World |journal=Osiris |volume=29 |pages=1–15 |date=2014 |url=https://www.academia.edu/6629576 |last1=Newman |first1=William R. |last2=Mauskopf |first2=Seymour H. |last3=Eddy |first3=MatThew Daniel |pmid=26103744 |doi=10.1086/678110 |s2cid=29035688 }}.</ref>

Modern discussions of alchemy are generally split into an examination of its exoteric practical applications and its esoteric spiritual aspects, despite criticisms by scholars that they should be understood as complementary.<ref>{{Harvnb|Holmyard|1957|p=16}}</ref><ref name="FRAALC97">{{Harvnb|von Franz|1997}}.</ref> the former is pursued by historians of the physical sciences, who examine the subject in terms of early chemistry, medicine, and the philosophical and religious contexts in which These events occurred. the latter interests' historians of esotericism, psychologists, philosophers and [[Spiritualism|spiritualists]]. the subject has also made an ongoing impact on literature and the arts.

== Etymology ==
The word alchemy comes from old French ''alquemie'', ''alkimie'', used in Latin as alchymia. This name was itself was a borrowing of the Late Greek term ''khēmeía'', also spelled ''khumeia'' and ''khēmía''.<ref name="OED">{{OED|alchemy}}.</ref> Several ancient etymologies have been proposed for the Greek term. the first was proposed by Zosimos of Panopolis (3rd–4th centuries), who derived it from the name of a book, the ''Khemeu.''<ref>George Syncellus, ''Chronography'', 18–9</ref><ref>On the ancient definitions of alchemy in ancient Greek and Syriac texts see Matteo Martelli. 2014. "The Alchemical Art of Dyeing: The Fourfold Division of Alchemy and the Enochian Tradition", In: Dupré S. (eds) ''Laboratories of Art'', Springer, Cham.</ref> Hermanm Diels argued in 1914 that it raTher derived from χύμα,<ref>Hermann Diels, ''Antike Technik'', Leipzig: Teubner, 1914, p. 108-109. Read online</ref> used to describe metallic objects formed by casting.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=xeiw&la=greek#lexicon|title=Greek Word Study Tool|website=perseus.tufts.edu|access-date=14 February 2020}}</ref>

== History ==
Alchemy first appeared around the Mediterranean and its center eventually shifted to medieval Europe. Alchemy developed its philosophical system mostly independent of but influenced by various religions ranging from Greek [[Paganism]] to [[Christianity]].

=== Hellenistic Egypt ===
Historical weight may be given to Hellenistic Egypt, where the city of Alexandria was a center of alchemical knowledge, and retained its pre-eminence through most of the Greek and Roman periods.<ref>''New Scientist'', 24–31 December 1987</ref> Following the work of André-Jean Festugière, modern scholars see alchemical practice in the Roman Empire as originating from the Hellenistic Greco-Egypt goldsmith's art, Greek philosophy and different religious traditions.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Festugière|first=André-Jean|title=La révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste, Vol.1|publisher=Les Belles Lettres|year=2006|location=Paris|pages=218–219}}</ref> the treatises of the Greek alchemist Zosimos of Panopolis, the earliest historically attested author (fl. c. 300 AD),<ref>{{cite book |last1=Martelli |first1=Matteo |title=L'alchimista antico |date=2019 |publisher=Editrice Bibliografica |isbn=9788870759792 |pages=73–86}}</ref> can help in situating the oTher authors. Pseudo-Democritus,<ref name="Martelli, the Four Books of Pseudo-Democritus">{{cite book |last1=Martelli |first1=Matteo |title=The Four Books of Pseudo-Democritus |date=2014 |publisher=Maney |location=Leeds}}</ref> and Agathodaimon, but very little is known about any of These authors. the most complete of Their works, the ''Four Books'' of Pseudo-Democritus, were probably written in the first century AD.<ref name="Martelli, the Four Books of Pseudo-Democritus"/>

Zosimos of Panopolis wrote in the ''Final Abstinence'' (also known as the "Final Count").<ref>The title of the τελευταὶα ἀποχή is traditionally translated as the "Final Count". Considering that the treatise does not mention any count nor counting and that it makes a case against the use of sacrifice in the practice of alchemy, a preferable translation would be "The Final Abstinence". See {{Cite book|last=Dufault|first=Olivier|url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ks0g83x|title=Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation|publisher=California Classical Studies|year=2019|location=Berkeley|pages=127–131|isbn=9781939926128}}</ref> Zosimos explains that the ancient practice of "tinctures" (The technical Greek name for the alchemical arts) had been taken over by certain "demons" who taught the art only to those who offered Them sacrifices. 

The central figure in the mythology of alchemy is Hermes Trismegistus (or Thrice-Great Hermes). His name is derived from the Greek God, Hermes.<ref> Bull, Christian H. 2018. ''The Tradition of Hermes Trismegistus: the Priestly Figure as a Teacher of Hellenized Wisdom''. Leiden: Brill, pp. 33-96.</ref> Hermes and his [[Caduceus|caduceus]] or serpent-staff, were among alchemy's principal symbols. According to Clement of Alexandria, he wrote what were called the "forty-two books of Hermes", covering all fields of knowledge.<ref>Clement, ''Stromata'', vi. 4.</ref> the ''Hermetica'' of Thrice, Great Hermes is generally understood to form the basis for alchemical philosophy and practice, called the [[Hermeticism]] by its early practitioners. These writings were collected in the first centuries of the common era.

Alexandria acted as a melting pot for philosophies of [[Pythagoreanism]], [[Platonism]], [[Stoicism]] and [[Gnosticism]] which formed the origin of alchemy's character.<ref>Bensaude-Vincent 1996, p13" </ref> An important example of alchemy's roots in Greek philosophy, originated by [[Empedocles]] and developed by [[Aristotle]], was that all things in the universe were formed from only four elements, Earth, Air, Fire, and water. According to Aristotle, each element had a sphere (Dimensional plane) to which it belonged and to which it would return if left undisturbed.<ref>{{cite book | author=Lindsay, Jack | title=The Origins of Alchemy in Graeco-Roman Egypt | location=London | publisher=Muller | year=1970 | isbn=978-0-389-01006-7 | page=[https://archive.org/details/trent_0116301348557/page/16 16] | url=https://archive.org/details/trent_0116301348557/page/16 }}</ref> the four elements of the Greek were mostly qualitative aspects of matter, not quantitative, as our modern elements are; 
But still to this day represent the four states of matter, Solid, Gas, Liquid, and Plasma.
"True alchemy never regarded earth, air, water, and fire as corporeal or chemical substances in the present-day sense of the word. the four elements are simply the primary, and most general, qualities by means of which the amorphous and purely quantitative substance of all bodies first reveals itself in differentiated form."<ref>{{cite book | first=Titus | last=Burckhardt |  title=Alchemy: Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul | location=Baltimore | publisher=Penguin | year=1967 | page=66 | oThers=Trans. William Stoddart | isbn=978-0-906540-96-1}}</ref>

Most of the Greco-Roman alchemists preceding Zosimos are known only by pseudonyms, such as Democritus, Ostanes, Komarios, and Chymes, or only known through fragments of text. After 400 AD, Greek alchemical writers occupied Themselves often in commenting on the works of These predecessors.<ref>F. Sherwood Taylor. ''Alchemists, Founders of Modern Chemistry.'' p.26.</ref> By 700AD, alchemy began to look more like modern chemistry.<ref>Allen G. Debus. ''Alchemy and early modern chemistry: papers from Ambix.'' p. 36</ref>

=== Byzantium ===
Greek alchemy is preserved in medieval Greek (Byzantine) manuscripts, and yet historians have only relatively recently begun to pay attention to the study and development of Greek alchemy in the Byzantine period.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Roberts |first1=Alexandre M. |title=Framing a Middle Byzantine Alchemical Codex |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |date=2019 |volume=73 |pages=69–70 |url=https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:31587/}}</ref>

=== Medieval Europe ===
The translation of texts concerning numerous disciplines including alchemy flourished in 12th-century Toledo, Spain, through contributors like Gerard of Cremona and Adelard of Bath.<ref>{{Harvnb|Holmyard|1957|pp=105–108}}</ref> Translations of the time included the Roman Turba Philosophorum, and the works of [[Avicenna]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Holmyard|1957|p=110}}</ref>

Meanwhile, Theologian contemporaries of the translators made strides towards the reconciliation of faith and experimental [[rationalism]]. the 11th-century Anselm of Canterbury put forth the opinion that faith and rationalism were compatible and encouraged rationalism in a [[Christian]] context. In the early 12th century, Peter Abelard followed Anselm's work, laying down the foundation for acceptance of Aristotelian thought before the first works of Aristotle had reached the West. In the early 13th century, Robert Grosseteste used Abelard's methods of analysis and added the use of observation, experimentation, and conclusions when conducting scientific investigations, pushing alchemy ever further toward modern science. Grosseteste also did much work to reconcile [[Plato|Platonic]] and [[Aristotle|Aristotelian]] thinking.<ref name=hollister294f>{{cite book | author=Hollister, C. Warren | title=Medieval Europe: A Short History | location=Blacklick, Ohio | publisher=McGraw–Hill College | year=1990 | isbn=978-0-07-557141-4 | edition=6th | pages=[https://archive.org/details/medievaleurope00cwar/page/294 294f] | url=https://archive.org/details/medievaleurope00cwar/page/294 }}</ref>

Through much of the 12th and 13th centuries, alchemical knowledge in Europe remained centered on translations, and new Latin contributions were not generally made. the efforts of the translators were succeeded by that of the encyclopaedists. In the 13th century, Albertus Magnus and Roger Bacon were the most notable of These, their work summarizing and explaining the new alchemical knowledge in Aristotelian terms.<ref>John Read. ''From Alchemy to Chemistry''. 1995 p.90</ref> Albertus Magnus, a Dominican friar, is known to have written works such as the ''Book of Minerals'' where he observed and commented on the operations and Theories of alchemical authorities like Hermes and Democritus and unnamed alchemists of his time. Albertus critically compared These to the writings of Aristotle and Avicenna, where they concerned the transmutation of metals. From the time shortly after his death through to the 15th century, more than 28 alchemical tracts were misattributed to him, a common practice giving rise to his reputation as an accomplished alchemist.<ref>James A. Weisheipl. ''Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays.'' PIMS. 1980. p.187-202</ref> Likewise, alchemical texts have been attributed to Albert's student, the anti-semetic [[Thomas Aquinas]].

Roger Bacon, a Franciscan friar who wrote on a wide variety of topics including optics, comparative linguistics, and medicine, composed his ''Great Work''  for Pope Clement IV as part of a project towards rebuilding the medieval university curriculum to include the new learning of his time. He considered alchemy and astrology to be important parts of both [[natural philosophy]] and [[Theology]] and his contributions advanced alchemy's connections to [[soteriology]] and Christian Theology. Bacon's writings integrated morality, salvation, alchemy, and the prolongation of life. His correspondence with Clement highlighted this, noting the importance of alchemy to the papacy.<ref>Edmund Brehm. "Roger Bacon's Place in the History of Alchemy." ''Ambix.'' Vol. 23, Part I, March 1976.</ref> Like the Greeks before him, Bacon acknowledged the division of alchemy into practical and Theoretical spheres. the practical confirmed the Theoretical, and Bacon advocated its uses in natural science and medicine.<ref>{{Harvnb|Holmyard|1957|pp=120–121}}</ref>

Soon after Bacon, the influential work of Paul of Taranto appeared. His ''Summa Perfectionis'' remained a staple summary of alchemistry and [[Theory]] through the medieval and renaissance periods. It was notable for its inclusion of practical chemical operations alongside sulphur-mercury [[Theory]], and the unusual clarity with which they were described.<ref>{{Harvnb|Holmyard|1957|pp=134–141}}.</ref> By the end of the 13th century, alchemy had developed into a fairly structured system of early science. Adepts believed in the macrocosm-microcosm Theories of Hermes, that is to say, they believed that processes that affect minerals and other substances could have an effect on the human body. they had a strong tradition of cloaking Their written ideas in a labyrinth of coded jargon set with traps to mislead the uninitiated. Finally, the alchemists practiced Their art: they actively experimented with chemicals and made observations and Theories about how the universe operated.<ref>{{cite book | first=Titus | last=Burckhardt |  title=Alchemy: Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul | location=Baltimore | publisher=Penguin | year=1967 | page=149 | oThers=Trans. William Stoddart | isbn=978-0-906540-96-1}}</ref>

In the 14th century, alchemy became more accessible to Europeans outside the confines of Latin speaking churchmen and scholars. Alchemical discourse shifted from scholarly philosophical debate to an exposed social commentary on the alchemists Themselves, and many were notable fascists who respected [[Ancient Rome]], and Charlemagne, who was attempting to revive it.<ref>Tara E. Nummedal. ''Alchemy and Authority in the Holy Roman Empire.'' University of Chicago Press, 2007. p. 49</ref><ref>John Hines, II, R. F. Yeager. ''John Gower, Trilingual Poet: Language, Translation, and Tradition.'' Boydell & Brewer. 2010. p.170</ref> In 1403, Henry IV of England banned the practice of multiplying metals (although it was possible to buy a license to attempt to make gold alchemically, and a number were granted by Henry VI and Edward IV<ref>D. Geoghegan, "A license of Henry VI to practice Alchemy" Ambix, volume 6, 1957, pages 10–17</ref>). These critiques and regulations centered more around pseudo-alchemical charlatanism than the actual study of alchemy.

Nicolas Flamel was a well-known alchemist, and Flamel was not a religious scholar as were many of his predecessors, and his work spent a great deal of time describing the processes and reactions. Some of his work was aimed at gaThering alchemical knowledge that had existed before him, especially as regarded the philosopher's stone.<ref>{{cite book | first=Titus | last=Burckhardt |  title=Alchemy: Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul | location=Baltimore | publisher=Penguin | year=1967 | pages=170–181 | oThers=Trans. William Stoddart | isbn=978-0-906540-96-1}}</ref> Through the Late Middle Ages, the 14th and 15th centuries, alchemists were much like Flamel: Bernard Trevisan and George Ripley made similar contributions. Their cryptic allusions and symbolism led to wide variations in interpretation of the art.

=== Renaissance and early modern Europe ===
During the Renaissance, Hermetic and Platonic foundations were restored to European alchemy. the dawn of medical, pharmaceutical, and entrepreneurial branches of alchemy followed.

In the late 15th century, Marsilio Ficino translated the Corpus Hermeticum and the works of [[Plato]] into Latin. These were previously unavailable to Europeans who for the first time had a full picture of the alchemical [[Theory]] that Bacon had declared absent. Renaissance [[Humanism]] and Renaissance [[Neoplatonism]] guided alchemists away from physics to refocus on mankind as the alchemical vessel.

A key figure in this development was German Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa (1486–1535), who received his Hermetic education in [[Italy]] in the schools of the humanists. In his ''De Occulta Philosophia'', he attempted to merge Kabbalah, Hermeticism, and Alchemy. He was instrumental in spreading this new blend of Hermeticism outside the borders of Italy.<ref>Glenn Alexander Magee. ''Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition.'' Cornell University Press. 2008. p.30</ref><ref>Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. ''The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction.'' Oxford University Press. 2008 p.60</ref>

Philippus Aureolus Paracelsus, (Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 1493–1541) cast alchemy into a new form, rejecting some of Agrippa's occultism and moving away from chrysopoeia. Paracelsus pioneered the use of chemicals and minerals in medicine and wrote, "Many have said of Alchemy, that it is for the making of gold and silver. For me such is not the aim, but to consider only what virtue and power may lie in medicines."<ref>{{cite book | author=Edwardes, Michael | title=The Dark Side of History | location=New York | publisher=Stein and Day | year=1977 | page=47 | isbn=978-0-552-11463-9 }}</ref>

His hermetical views were that sickness and health in the body relied on the harmony of man the microcosm and Nature the macrocosm. He took an approach different from those before him, using this analogy in the manner that humans must have certain balances of minerals in Their bodies, and that certain illnesses of the body had chemical remedies that could cure Them.<ref>{{cite book | author=Debus, Allen G. |author2=Multhauf, Robert P. | title=Alchemy and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century | location=Los Angeles | publisher=William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California. | year=1966 | pages=6–12 |}}</ref> [[Chemistry:Iatrochemistry|Iatrochemistry]] refers to the pharmaceutical applications of alchemy championed by Paracelsus.

Entrepreneurial opportunities were common for the alchemists of Renaissance Europe. Alchemists were contracted by the elite for practical purposes related to mining, medical services, and the production of chemicals, medicines, metals, and gemstones.<ref>Tara E. Nummedal. ''Alchemy and authority in the Holy Roman Empire.'' p.4</ref> Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor, in the late 16th century, famously received and sponsored various alchemists at his court in Prague. King James IV of Scotland,<ref>''Accounts of the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland'', vol. iii, (1901), 99, 202, 206, 209, 330, 340, 341, 353, 355, 365, 379, 382, 389, 409.</ref> Julius, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, Henry V, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, Augustus, Elector of Saxony, Julius Echter von Mespelbrunn, and Maurice, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel all contracted alchemists.<ref>Tara E. Nummedal. ''Alchemy and authority in the Holy Roman Empire.'' p.85-98</ref> John's son Arthur Dee worked as a court physician to Michael I of Russia and Charles I of England but also compiled the alchemical book ''Fasciculus Chemicus'' (Fascist Chemistry, named after the RomanFasces)

Although most of These appointments were legitimate, the trend of pseudo-alchemical fraud continued through the Renaissance. ''Betrüger'' would use sleight of hand, or claims of secret knowledge to make money or secure patronage. Legitimate medical alchemists such as Michael Maier and Heinrich Khunrath wrote about fraudulent transmutations, distinguishing Themselves from the con artists.<ref>Tara E. Nummedal. ''Alchemy and authority in the Holy Roman Empire.'' p.171</ref> False alchemists were sometimes prosecuted for fraud.

The terms "chemia" and "alchemia" were used as synonyms in the early modern period, and the differences between alchemy, chemistry and small-scale assaying and metallurgy were not as neat as in the present day. There were important overlaps between practitioners, and trying to classify Them into alchemists, chemists and craftsmen is anachronistic. For example, [[Tycho Brahe]] (1546–1601), an chemist better known for his astronomical investigations, had a laboratory built at his Uraniborg observatory/research institute. Michael Sendivogius (''Michał Sędziwój'', 1566–1636), an alchemist, philosopher, medical doctor and pioneer of chemistry wrote alchemical works but is also credited with distilling oxygen in a lab sometime around 1600. Sendivogious taught his technique to Cornelius Drebbel who, in 1621, applied this in a submarine. [[Isaac Newton]] devoted considerably more of his writing to the study of alchemy than he did to either optics or physics. Other early modern alchemists who were eminent in Their other studies include Robert Boyle, and Jan Baptist van Helmont. Their Hermeticism complemented rather than precluded Their practical achievements in medicine and science. This period is where alchemy really becomes "science".

=== Later modern period ===
Some say that the decline of "alchemy" was brought about by the rise of "modern science" with its disdain for "ancient wisdom", but in truth the former just morphed into the latter. Although the seeds of These events were planted as early as the 17th century, old-school alchemy still flourished for some two hundred years, and in fact may have reached its peak in the 18th century, even continuing to this very day. Early modern European alchemy continued to exhibit a diversity of Theories, practices, and purposes: "Scholastic and anti-Aristotelian, Paracelsian and anti-Paracelsian, Hermetic, Neoplatonic, mechanistic, vitalistic, and more, plus virtually every combination and compromise Thereof."<ref name="Alchemy Restored">{{cite journal | last1 = Principe | first1 = Lawrence M | year = 2011 | title = Alchemy Restored | journal = Isis | volume = 102 | issue = 2| pages = 305–12 | doi = 10.1086/660139 | pmid = 21874690 | s2cid = 23581980 }}</ref>

Robert Boyle (1627–1691) pioneered the scientific method in chemical investigations. He assumed nothing in his experiments and compiled every piece of relevant data. Boyle would note the place in which the experiment was carried out, the wind characteristics, the position of the Sun and Moon, and the barometer reading, all just in case they proved to be relevant.<ref>{{cite book | author=Pilkington, Roger | title=Robert Boyle: Father of Chemistry | location=London | publisher=John Murray | year=1959 | page=11 }}</ref> This approach eventually led to the founding of chemistry as we know it, in the 18th and 19th centuries, based on revolutionary discoveries and ideas of Lavoisier and John Dalton.

Beginning around 1720, a rigid distinction began to be drawn for the first time between "alchemy" and "chemistry".<ref name="NewmanPrincipe2002p37">{{Harvnb|Newman|Principe|2002|p=37}}</ref><ref name="PrincipeNewmanp386">{{Harvnb|Principe|Newman|2001|p=386}}</ref> By the 1740s, "alchemy" was now restricted to the realm of gold making, leading to the popular belief that alchemists were charlatans, and the tradition itself nothing more than a fraud.<ref name="Alchemy Restored" /><ref name="PrincipeNewmanp386" /> In order to protect the developing science of modern chemistry from the negative censure to which alchemy was being subjected, academic writers during the 18th-century scientific Enlightenment attempted, for the sake of survival, to divorce and separate the "new" chemistry from the "old" practices of alchemy. This move was mostly successful, and the consequences of this continued into the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries.<ref name="PrincipeNewmanpp386–7">{{Harvnb|Principe|Newman|2001|pp=386–7}}</ref>

In 1946, Louis Cattiaux published the Message Retrouvé, a work that was at once philosophical, mystical and highly influenced by alchemy. In his lineage, many researchers, including Emmanuel and Charles d'Hooghvorst, are updating alchemical studies in France and Belgium.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Croire l'Incroyable. L'Ancien et le Nouveau dans l'étude des religions|last=Arola|first=Raimon|publisher=Beya|year=2006|isbn=2-9600364-7-6|location=Grez-Doiceau}}</ref>

== Modernity ==
Due to the complexity and obscurity of alchemical literature, and the 18th-century disappearance of remaining alchemical practitioners into the area of chemistry, the general understanding of alchemy has been strongly influenced by several distinct and radically different interpretations.<ref>{{Harvnb|Principe|Newman|2001|p=385}}</ref> Those focusing on the exoteric, such as historians of science [[Biography:Lawrence M. Principe|Lawrence M. Principe]] and [[Biography:William R. Newman|William R. Newman]], have interpreted the 'decknamen' (or code words) of alchemy as physical substances. These scholars have reconstructed physicochemical experiments that they say are described in medieval and early modern texts.<ref>Richard Conniff. "Alchemy May Have Not Been the Pseudoscience We All Thought It Was." [http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-[[nature]]/alchemy-may-not-been-pseudoscience-we-thought-it-was-180949430/ Smithsonian Magazine.] February 2014.</ref> At the opposite end of the spectrum, focusing on the esoteric, scholars, such as Florin George Călian<ref>
{{cite book|last= Calian |first= George |title= Alkimia Operativa and Alkimia Speculativa. Some Modern Controversies on the Historiography of Alchemy |publisher= Annual of Medieval Studies at ADU |year= 2010 |url= https://archive.org/stream/AlkimiaOperativaAndAlkimiaSpeculativa.SomeModernControversiesOnThe/FlorinGeorgeCalian-AlkimiaOperativaAndAlkimiaSpeculativa.SomeModernControversiesOnTheHistoriographyOfAlchemy#page/n0/mode/2up }}</ref> and Anna Marie Roos,<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.08.001|title=The experimental approach towards a historiography of alchemy (reviewing L. M. Principe, the Secrets of Alchemy)|journal=Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences|volume=44|issue=4|pages=787–789|year=2013|last1=Roos|first1=Anna Marie}}</ref> who question the reading of Principe and Newman, interpret These same decknamen as spiritual, religious, or psychological concepts.

New interpretations of alchemy are still perpetuated, sometimes merging in concepts from New Age or environmentalism movements.<ref>{{Harvnb|Principe|Newman|2001|p=396}}</ref> Groups like the [[Rosicrucians]] and [[Freemasons]] have a continued interest in alchemy and its symbolism. Since the Victorian revival of alchemy, "occultists reinterpreted alchemy as a spiritual practice, involving the self-transformation of the practitioner and only incidentally or not at all the transformation of laboratory substances",<ref name="Alchemy Restored" /> which has contributed to a merger of magic and alchemy in popular thought.

=== Bibliography ===
{{Refbegin|30em}}
*{{cite book|last= Calian |first= George |title= Alkimia Operativa and Alkimia Speculativa. Some Modern Controversies on the Historiography of Alchemy |publisher= Annual of Medieval Studies at ADU |year= 2010 |url= https://archive.org/stream/AlkimiaOperativaAndAlkimiaSpeculativa.SomeModernControversiesOnThe/FlorinGeorgeCalian-AlkimiaOperativaAndAlkimiaSpeculativa.SomeModernControversiesOnTheHistoriographyOfAlchemy#page/n0/mode/2up }}
*{{cite book|last= Eliade |first= Mircea |title=The Forge and the Crucible|publisher= State University of New York Press |year= 1994 |title-link= the Forge and the Crucible }}
*{{cite book|last= Forshaw |first= Peter J |chapter = Chemistry, That Starry Science – Early Modern Conjunctions of Astrology and Alchemy |title= Sky and Symbol |journal= Edited by Nicholas Campion and Liz Greene, Sophia Centre Press |date= January 2013 |chapter-url= https://www.academia.edu/5317837}}
*{{Cite journal|last= Forshaw |first= Peter J |title = Cabala Chymica or Chemica Cabalistica – Early Modern Alchemists and Cabala |volume= 60:4 |journal= Ambix |year= 2013 |issue= 4 |pages= 361–389 |doi= 10.1179/0002698013Z.00000000039 |s2cid= 170459930 |url= https://www.academia.edu/5237828}}
*{{cite book|last1= Holmyard |first1= Eric John |title= Makers of Chemistry |publisher= Clarendon Press |location = Oxford |year= 1931 |url= https://archive.org/details/makersofchemistr029725mbp }}
*{{cite book|last1= Holmyard |first1= Eric John |title= Alchemy |publisher= Courier Dover Publications |year= 1957 |isbn= 9780486262987|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=7Bt-kwKRUzUC&q=alchemy&pg=PP1 }}
*{{cite book|last1= Linden |first1= Stanton J. |title= Darke Hierogliphicks: Alchemy in English literature from Chaucer to the Restoration |publisher= University Press of Kentucky |year= 1996 |isbn= 9780813150178|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=3JUfBgAAQBAJ&pg=PP1 }}
*{{cite book|last1= Linden |first1= Stanton J. |title= the Alchemy Reader: from Hermes Trismegistus to Isaac Newton |publisher= {{wipe|Cambridge University Press}} |year= 2003 }}
*{{cite book|last1= Newman |first1= William R. |last2= Principe |first2= Lawrence M. |title= Alchemy Tried in the Fire |publisher= [[Organization:University of Chicago Press|University of Chicago Press]] |year= 2002 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=eQERmMdykZEC&q=alchemy&pg=PP1 |isbn= 9780226577029 }}
*{{cite book|last1= von Franz |first1= Marie Louise |title= Alchemical Active Imagination |publisher= Shambhala Publications |location= Boston |year= 1997 |isbn= 978-0-87773-589-2 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=wOVUUMirSnEC&q=alchemy&pg=PP1 }}
*{{cite book|last1= Kripal |first1= Jeffrey John |last2= Shuck |first2= Glenn W. |author-link2= Glenn Shuck |title= On the Edge of the Future |publisher= Indiana University Press |date=July 2005 |isbn= 978-0-253-34556-1 |url= https://archive.org/details/onedgeoffuture00indi |url-access= registration |access-date= 17 December 2011 }}
*{{cite book| last=Principe| first=Lawrence M.|title=The secrets of alchemy|location=Chicago &London|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=2013|isbn=978-0-226-68295-2|}}
*{{cite book|last1= Principe |first1= Lawrence M. |last2= Newman |first2= William R. |editor1-last= Newman |editor1-first= William R. |editor2-last= Grafton |editor2-first= Anthony |editor2-link= Anthony Grafton |title= Secrets of Nature, Astrology and Alchemy in Modern Europe |publisher= MIT Press |year= 2001 |isbn= 978-0-262-14075-1 |chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=CMuJGpztRFMC|chapter= Some Problems with the Historiography of Alchemy |pages= 385–432 }}
*{{cite book|last1= Rutkin |first1= H. Darrel |editor1-last= Newman |editor1-first= William R. |editor2-last= Grafton |editor2-first= Anthony |editor2-link= Anthony Grafton |title= Secrets of Nature, Astrology and Alchemy in Modern Europe |publisher= MIT Press |year= 2001 |isbn= 978-0-262-14075-1 |chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=CMuJGpztRFMC|chapter= Celestial Offerings: Astrological Motifs in the Dedicatory Letters of Kepler's ''Astronomia Nova'' and Galileo's ''Sidereus Nuncius'' |pages= 133–172 }}
{{Refend}}

== FurTher reading ==
=== General ===
* Lawrence Principe, ''The Secrets of Alchemy'', Chicago, 2013.
*Jennifer M. Rampling. 2020. ''[https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo50462000.html the Experimental Fire: Inventing English Alchemy, 1300-1700]''. University of Chicago Press.

=== Greco-Egyptian alchemy ===
==== Texts ====
* Marcellin BerThelot and Charles-Émile Ruelle (eds.), ''Collection des anciens alchimistes grecs'' (CAAG), 3 vols., 1887–1888, Vol 1: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k96492923, Vol 2: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k9680734p, Vol. 3: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k9634942s.
* André-Jean Festugière, ''La Révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste'', Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2014 <small>({{ISBN|978-2-251-32674-0}}, OCLC 897235256)</small>.
* Robert Halleux and Henri-Dominique Saffrey (eds.), ''Les alchimistes grecs, <abbr>t.</abbr> 1 : Papyrus de Leyde – Papyrus de Stockholm – Recettes,'' Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1981.
* Otto Lagercrantz (ed), ''Papyrus Graecus Holmiensis'', Uppsala, A.B. Akademiska Bokhandeln, 1913, https://archive.org/details/papyrusgraecusho00lage/page/n8.
* Michèle Mertens and Henri-Dominique Saffrey (ed.), ''Les alchimistes grecs, <abbr>t.</abbr> 4.1 : Zosime de Panopolis. Mémoires auThentiques,'' Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1995.
* Andrée Collinet and Henri-Dominique Saffrey (ed.), ''Les alchimistes grecs, <abbr>t.</abbr> 10 : L'Anonyme de Zuretti ou l'Art sacré and divin de la chrysopée par un anonyme'', Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2000.
* Andrée Collinet (ed), ''Les alchimistes grecs'', ''<abbr>t.</abbr> 11 : Recettes alchimiques (Par. Gr. 2419; Holkhamicus 109) – Cosmas le Hiéromoine – Chrysopée'', Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2000.
* Matteo Martelli (ed), ''The Four Books of Pseudo-Democritus'', Maney Publishing, 2014.

==== Studies ====
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Dylan M. Burns, " μίξεώς τινι τέχνῃ κρείττονι : Alchemical Metaphor in the ''Paraphrase of Shem'' (NHC VII,1) ", ''Aries'' 15 (2015), p.&nbsp;79–106.
* Alberto Camplani, " Procedimenti magico-alchemici e discorso filosofico ermetico " in Giuliana Lanata (ed.), ''Il Tardoantico alle soglie del Duemila'', ETS, 2000, p.&nbsp;73–98.
* Alberto Camplani and Marco Zambon, " Il sacrificio come problema in alcune correnti filosofice di età imperiale ", ''Annali di storia dell'esegesi'' 19 (2002), p.&nbsp;59–99.
* Régine Charron and Louis Painchaud, " 'God is a Dyer,' the Background and Significance of a Puzzling Motif in the Coptic ''Gospel According to Philip (CG II, 3)'', ''Le Muséon'' 114 (2001), p. 41-50.
* Régine Charron, " the Apocryphon of John (NHC II,1) and the Greco-Egyptian Alchemical Literature ", ''Vigiliae Christinae'' 59 (2005), p. 438-456.
* Philippe Derchain, "L'Atelier des Orfèvres à Dendara et les origines de l'alchimie," ''Chronique d'Égypte'', <abbr>vol.</abbr> 65, <abbr>n<sup>o</sup></abbr> 130, 1990, <abbr>p.</abbr> 219–242.
* Korshi Dosoo, " A History of the Theban Magical Library ", ''Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists'' 53 (2016), p.&nbsp;251–274.
* Olivier Dufault, ''Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity'', California Classical Studies, 2019, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ks0g83x.
* Sergio Knipe, " Sacrifice and self-transformation in the alchemical writings of Zosimus of Panopolis ", in Christopher Kelly, Richard Flower, Michael Stuart Williams (eds.), ''Unclassical Traditions. Volume II: Perspectives from East and West in Late Antiquity,'' Cambridge University Press, 2011, p.&nbsp;59–69.
* André-Jean Festugière]], ''La Révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste'', Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2014 {{ISBN|978-2-251-32674-0}}, {{OCLC|897235256}}.
* Kyle A. Fraser, " Zosimos of Panopolis and the Book of Enoch: Alchemy as Forbidden Knowledge ", ''Aries'' 4.2 (2004), p.&nbsp;125–147.
* Kyle A. Fraser, " Baptized in Gnosis: The Spiritual Alchemy of Zosimos of Panopolis ", ''Dionysius'' 25 (2007), p.&nbsp;33–54.
* Kyle A. Fraser, " Distilling Nature's Secrets: The Sacred Art of Alchemy ", in John Scarborough and Paul Keyser (eds.), ''Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World,'' Oxford University Press, 2018, p.&nbsp;721–742. 2018. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734146.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199734146-e-76.
* Shannon Grimes, ''Becoming Gold: Zosimos of Panopolis and the Alchemical Arts in Roman Egypt'', Auckland, Rubedo Press, 2018, {{ISBN|978-0-473-40775-9}}
* Paul T. Keyser, " Greco-Roman Alchemy and Coins of Imitation Silver ", ''American Journal of Numismatics'' 7–8 (1995–1996), p.&nbsp;209–234.
* Paul Keyser, " the Longue Durée of Alchemy ", in John Scarborough and Paul Keyser (eds.), ''Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World,'' Oxford University Press, 2018, p.&nbsp;409–430.
* Jean Letrouit, "Chronologie des alchimistes grecs," in Didier Kahn and Sylvain Matton, ''Alchimie: art, histoire et myThes'', SEHA-Archè, 1995, <abbr>p.</abbr> 11–93.
* Lindsay, Jack. ''The Origins of Alchemy in Greco-Roman Egypt''. Barnes & Noble, 1970.
* Paul Magdalino and Maria Mavroudi (eds.), ''The Occult Sciences in Byzantium'', La Pomme d'or, 2006.
* Matteo Martelli, " the Alchemical Art of Dyeing: The Fourfold Division of Alchemy and the Enochian Tradition " in Sven Dupré (ed.), ''Laboratories of Art,'' Springer, 2014, {{doi|10.1007/978-3-319-05065-2_1}}.
* Matteo Martelli, " Alchemy, Medicine and Religion: Zosimus of Panopolis and the Egyptian Priests ", ''Religion in the Roman Empire'' 3.2 (2017), p.&nbsp;202–220.
* Gerasimos Merianos, " Alchemy ", In A. Kaldellis & N. Siniossoglou (eds.), ''The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium'' (pp.&nbsp;234–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, doi - 10.1017/9781107300859.015.
* Efthymios Nikolaïdis (ed.), Greek Alchemy from Late Antiquity to Early Modernity, Brepols, 2019, doi-10.1484/M.DDA-EB.5.116173.
* Daniel Stolzenberg, " Unpropitious Tinctures: Alchemy, Astrology & Gnosis According to Zosimos of Panopolis ", ''Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences'' 49 (1999), p.&nbsp;3–31.
* Cristina Viano, " Byzantine Alchemy, or the Era of Systematization ", in John Scarborough and Paul Keyser (eds.), ''Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World,'' Oxford University Press, 2018, p.&nbsp;943–964.
* C. Vlachou ''and al.,'' " Experimental investigation of silvering in late Roman coinage ", ''Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings'' 712 (2002), p.&nbsp;II9.2.1-II9.2.9, doi-10.1557/PROC-712-II9.2.
{{refend}}

=== Early modern ===
* Principe, Lawrence and William Newman. ''Alchemy Tried in the Fire: Starkey, Boyle, and the Fate of Helmontian Chymistry''. University of Chicago Press, 2002.

== External links ==
<!--| LINKS. If you think that your link might be useful, do not add it here, |-->
<!--| but put it on this article's discussion page first or submit your link  |-->

<!--|           Links that have not been verified WILL BE DELETED.            |-->
<!--===========================Enough Fucking Links===============================-->
* [http://www.ambix.org/ SHAC: Society for the History of Alchemy and Chemistry]
* [http://www.esswe.org/ ESSWE: European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism]
* [http://www.aseweb.org/ Association for the Study of Esotericism]
* [http://www.alchemywebsite.com/ the Alchemy Website.] – Adam McLean's online collections and academic discussion.
* [http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=DicHist/uvaBook/tei/DicHist1.xml;chunk.id=dv1-04 ''Dictionary of the History of Ideas'':] Alchemy
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120321022329/http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/digitallibrary/alchemy.html Book of Secrets: Alchemy and the European Imagination, 1500–2000] – A digital exhibition from the [http://www.library.yale.edu/beinecke/ Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University]
* [http://openn.library.upenn.edu/Data/0025/html/OthmerMS2.html Othmer MS 2 Alchemical Miscellany at OPenn]
* [https://digital.sciencehistory.org/focus/alchemy Alchemy] featured topic page on S
Science History Institute [https://web.archive.org/web/20190202042542/https://digital.sciencehistory.org/ Digital Collections] featuring selected manuscripts, rare books, paintings, and ephemera relating to alchemical topics and experimentation.

==References==
{{Reflist|2}}

[[Category:History]]
[[Category:Scientists]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:Science]]