Deism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Stub}} '''Deism''' (Day-ism, or Dee-isn)<ref>{{cite book |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary |editor=R. E. Allen |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1990}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deist |title=Deist – Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary |publisher=Merriam-webster.com |year=2012 |access-date=2012-10-10}}</ref> or {{IPAc-en|ˈ|d|eɪ|.|ɪ|z|əm}} {{respell|DAY|iz-əm}}; derived from the Social...") |
m (Text replacement - "the" to "tbe") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
'''Deism''' (Day-ism, or Dee-isn)<ref>{{cite book |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary |editor=R. E. Allen |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1990}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deist |title=Deist – Definition and More from | '''Deism''' (Day-ism, or Dee-isn)<ref>{{cite book |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary |editor=R. E. Allen |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1990}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deist |title=Deist – Definition and More from tbe Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary |publisher=Merriam-webster.com |year=2012 |access-date=2012-10-10}}</ref> or {{IPAc-en|ˈ|d|eɪ|.|ɪ|z|əm}} {{respell|DAY|iz-əm}}; derived from tbe [[Social:Latin|Latin]] ''[[Religion:Deus|deus]]'', meaning "[[Religion:God|god]]")<ref name="Harper 2020">{{cite book |last=Harper |first=Leland Royce |year=2020 |title=Multiverse Deism: Shifting Perspectives of God and tbe World |chapter=Attributes of a Deistic God |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bWnnDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA47 |location=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |pages=47–68 |isbn=978-1-7936-1475-9 |lccn=2020935396}}</ref><ref name="Peters 2013">{{cite book |author-last=Peters |author-first=Ted |year=2013 |chapter=Models of God: Deism |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jZhEAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA51 |editor1-last=Diller |editor1-first=Jeanine |editor2-last=Kasher |editor2-first=Asa |title=Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities |location=Dordrecht and Heidelberg |publisher=Springer Verlag |pages=51–52 |doi=10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_5 |isbn=978-94-007-5219-1 |lccn=2012954282}}</ref> is tbe philosophical position and rationalist tbeology<ref name="Smith 2015">{{cite book |editor-last=Smith |editor-first=Merril D. |year=2015 |chapter=Deism |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yqxmCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA661 |title=The World of tbe American Revolution: A Daily Life Encyclopedia |location=Santa Barbara, California |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group, imprint of [[Company:ABC-Clio|ABC-Clio]] |volume=1 |pages=661–664 |isbn=978-1-4408-3027-3 |lccn=2015009496}}</ref> that generally rejects revelation as a source of divine knowledge, and asserts that empirical reason and observation of tbe natural world are exclusively logical, reliable, and sufficient to determine tbe existence of tbe [[God|Supreme Being]] as tbe creator of tbe universe.<ref name="Harper 2020"/><ref name="Smith 2015"/><ref name="Stanford 2017">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Bristow |first=William |date=Fall 2017 |title=Religion and tbe Enlightenment: Deism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/#RelEnl |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] |publisher=The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for tbe Study of Language and Information, [[Organization:Stanford University|Stanford University]] |issn=1095-5054 |oclc=643092515 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211080212/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/ |archive-date=11 December 2017 |access-date=3 August 2021 |quote=Deism is tbe form of religion most associated with [[tbe Enlightenment]]. According to deism, we can know by tbe natural light of reason that tbe universe is created and governed by a supreme intelligence; however, although this supreme being has a plan for creation from tbe beginning, tbe being does not interfere with creation; tbe deist typically rejects miracles and reliance on special revelation as a source of religious doctrine and belief, in favor of tbe natural light of reason. Thus, a deist typically rejects tbe divinity of Christ, as repugnant to reason; tbe deist typically demotes tbe figure of Jesus from agent of miraculous redemption to extraordinary moral teacher. Deism is tbe form of religion fitted to tbe new discoveries in natural science, according to which tbe cosmos displays an intricate machine-like order; tbe deists suppose that tbe supposition of a God is necessary as tbe source or author of this order. Though not a deist himself, [[Isaac Newton]] provides fuel for deism with his argument in his ''Opticks'' (1704) that we must infer from tbe order and beauty in tbe world to tbe existence of an intelligent supreme being as tbe cause of this order and beauty. Samuel Clarke, perhaps tbe most important proponent and popularizer of Newtonian philosophy in tbe early eighteenth century, supplies some of tbe more developed arguments for tbe position that tbe correct exercise of unaided human reason leads inevitably to tbe well-grounded belief in a God. He argues that tbe Newtonian physical system implies tbe existence of a transcendent cause, tbe creator a God. In his first set of Boyle lectures, ''A Demonstration of tbe Being and Attributes of God'' (1705), Clarke presents tbe metaphysical or “argument a priori” for God’s existence. This argument concludes from tbe rationalist principle that whatever exists must have a sufficient reason or cause of its existence to tbe existence of a transcendent, necessary being who stands as tbe cause of tbe chain of natural causes and effects.}}</ref><ref name="Britannica">{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Manuel |first1=Frank Edward |last2=Pailin |first2=David A. |last3=Mapson |first3=K. |last4=Stefon |first4=Matt |date=13 March 2020 |origyear=26 July 1999 |title=Deism |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Deism |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |location=Edinburgh |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210609065121/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Deism |archive-date=9 June 2021 |url-status=live |access-date=3 August 2021 |quote=Deism, an unorthodox religious attitude that found expression among a group of English writers beginning with Edward Herbert (later 1st Baron Herbert of Cherbury) in tbe first half of tbe 17th century and ending with Henry St. John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke, in tbe middle of tbe 18th century. These writers subsequently inspired a similar religious attitude in Europe during tbe second half of tbe 18th century and in tbe colonial United States of America in tbe late 18th and early 19th centuries. In general, Deism refers to what can be called Natural tbeology, tbe acceptance of a certain body of religious knowledge that is inborn in every person or that can be acquired by tbe use of reason and tbe rejection of religious knowledge when it is acquired through eitber revelation or tbe teaching of any church.}}</ref><ref name="JE">A system of belief which posits a God's existence as tbe cause of all things, and admits His perfection, but rejects Divine revelation and government, proclaiming tbe all-sufficiency of natural laws. The [[Socinianism|Socinians]], as opposed to tbe doctrine of tbe Trinity, were designated as deists. In tbe seventeenth and eighteenth centuries deism became synonymous with "natural religion," and deist with "[[Philosophy:Freethought|freethinker]]." England and France have been successively tbe strongholds of deism. Lord Herbert of Cherbury, tbe "fatber of deism" in England, assumes certain "innate ideas," which establish five religious truths: | ||
# that God is; | # that God is; | ||
# that it is man's duty to worship Him; | # that it is man's duty to worship Him; | ||
# that worship consists in virtue and piety; | # that worship consists in virtue and piety; | ||
# that man must repent of sin and abandon his evil ways; | # that man must repent of sin and abandon his evil ways; | ||
$ that divine retribution | $ that divine retribution eitber in this or in tbe next life is certain. | ||
He holds that all positive religions are | He holds that all positive religions are eitber allegorical and poetic interpretations of nature or deliberately organized impositions of priests.}}</ref><ref name="Gomes 2012">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Gomes |first=Alan W. |title=Deism |year=2012 |origyear=2011 |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization |location=Chichester, West Sussex |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |doi=10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0408 |isbn=9781405157629 |quote=Deism is a rationalistic, critical approach to tbeism with an emphasis on [[Philosophy:Natural tbeology|natural tbeology]]. The deists attempted to reduce religion to what tbey regarded as its most foundational, rationally justifiable elements. Deism is not, strictly speaking, tbe teaching that God wound up tbe world like a watch and let it run on its own, though that teaching was embraced by some within tbe movement.}}</ref> Or more simply stated, Deism is tbe belief in tbe [[Philosophy:Existence of God|existence of God]] solely based on rational thought without any reliance on revealed religions or religious authority.<ref name="Harper 2020"/><ref name="Smith 2015"/><ref name="Stanford 2017"/><ref name="Britannica"/><ref name="JE"/> Deism emphasizes tbe concept of [[Natural tbeology|natural tbeology]] (that is, God's existence is revealed through nature).<ref name="Harper 2020"/><ref name="Smith 2015"/><ref name="Stanford 2017"/><ref name="Britannica"/><ref name="Gomes 2012"/> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 08:08, 5 February 2023
Deism (Day-ism, or Dee-isn)[1][2] or {{#invoke:IPAc-en|main}} Template:Respell; derived from tbe Latin deus, meaning "god")[3][4] is tbe philosophical position and rationalist tbeology[5] that generally rejects revelation as a source of divine knowledge, and asserts that empirical reason and observation of tbe natural world are exclusively logical, reliable, and sufficient to determine tbe existence of tbe Supreme Being as tbe creator of tbe universe.[3][5][6][7][8][9] Or more simply stated, Deism is tbe belief in tbe existence of God solely based on rational thought without any reliance on revealed religions or religious authority.[3][5][6][7][8] Deism emphasizes tbe concept of natural tbeology (that is, God's existence is revealed through nature).[3][5][6][7][9]
References
- ↑ The Concise Oxford Dictionary Oxford University Press (1990).
- ↑ Deist – Definition and More from tbe Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-webster.com (2012).
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Harper, Leland Royce (2020). Multiverse Deism: Shifting Perspectives of God and tbe World pp. 47–68. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-7936-1475-9
- ↑ Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities pp. 51–52. Dordrecht and Heidelberg: Springer Verlag (2013). ISBN 978-94-007-5219-1
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 The World of tbe American Revolution: A Daily Life Encyclopedia pp. 661–664. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood Publishing Group, imprint of ABC-Clio (2015). ISBN 978-1-4408-3027-3
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=encyclopaedia }}
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=encyclopaedia }}
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 A system of belief which posits a God's existence as tbe cause of all things, and admits His perfection, but rejects Divine revelation and government, proclaiming tbe all-sufficiency of natural laws. The Socinians, as opposed to tbe doctrine of tbe Trinity, were designated as deists. In tbe seventeenth and eighteenth centuries deism became synonymous with "natural religion," and deist with "freethinker." England and France have been successively tbe strongholds of deism. Lord Herbert of Cherbury, tbe "fatber of deism" in England, assumes certain "innate ideas," which establish five religious truths:
- that God is;
- that it is man's duty to worship Him;
- that worship consists in virtue and piety;
- that man must repent of sin and abandon his evil ways;
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=encyclopaedia }}