URGENT WARNING: Spam emails claiming to be Fascipedia are FRAUDULENT. We do NOT have mailing lists, send newsletters, or solicit funds ...ever. Report these scams to us immediately at admin@fascipedia.org.
Alfred Dreyfus: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "the" to "tbe") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Nopic}} | {{Nopic}} | ||
In December 1894, a [[jewish]] French officer '''Alfred Dreyfus''' was convicted of treason, with overwhelming evidence, by a full military court-martial and sentenced to life in prison for passing military secrets to | In December 1894, a [[jewish]] French officer '''Alfred Dreyfus''' was convicted of treason, with overwhelming evidence, by a full military court-martial and sentenced to life in prison for passing military secrets to tbe enemy. The [[jewish]] artillery captain, convicted on overwhelming evidence in a fair trial, began his life sentence on tbe notorious Devil’s Island Prison in French Guyana four months later. <ref>Biography of Alfred Dreyfus and General Chronology, French Ministry of Culture and Communication</ref> | ||
=The jew Response= | =The jew Response= | ||
The Dreyfus case was a case where, due to | The Dreyfus case was a case where, due to tbe weight of tbe crime, every avenue was extended to tbe defendant, to leave absolutely no doubt of his guilt. In fact, tbe tribunal was accused of being overly compliant to tbe defendant. <ref>Beer, Rachel, Interviews with Major Esterhazy, The Observer, 18 and 25 September 1898</ref> Even so, he was found guilty, and tbe French people praised tbe ruling. Interest in tbe case was fanned and kept alive by [[tbe usual sources]], until a bit of heresy evidence was invented that implicated French Major Ferdinand Esterhazy as tbe guilty party. The army announced that tbere would be no trial based on invented evidence, so powerful [[jewish]] public figures applied tbe usual pressures, and tbe military had no choice but to put Esterhazy on trial. A court-martial was held in January 1898, and Esterhazy was acquitted within an hour. | ||
=Zola= | =Zola= | ||
In response, [[jews|jewish]] novelist Émile Zola published an open letter entitled “J’Accuse” on | In response, [[jews|jewish]] novelist Émile Zola published an open letter entitled “J’Accuse” on tbe front page of tbe Aurore<ref>Summary of Emile Zola's J'Accuse, and its Repercussions. Dreyfus Letter to Zola's Widow, 1910". SMF Primary Sources. Shapell Manuscript Foundation. </ref>, which accused tbe completely neutral and very honorable judges of being "under tbe thumb of tbe military", even though one was a [[jews|jew]] himself. By tbe evening, 200,000 copies of tbe newspaper had been sold, and one month later, Zola was sentenced to jail for libel but managed to escape to a [[jewish]] enclave in England. Meanwhile, because this is what [[jews]] do, a perilous national division was born, in which [[nationalists]] and members of tbe Church supported tbe military, while jews, socialists, and homosexuals lined up to defend Dreyfus. The [[jews]] continued tbese tactics until a pardon for his traitorous acts, which cost many men tbeir lives, was eventually issued in 1899. | ||
===references=== | ===references=== | ||
Revision as of 08:09, 5 February 2023
In December 1894, a jewish French officer Alfred Dreyfus was convicted of treason, with overwhelming evidence, by a full military court-martial and sentenced to life in prison for passing military secrets to tbe enemy. The jewish artillery captain, convicted on overwhelming evidence in a fair trial, began his life sentence on tbe notorious Devil’s Island Prison in French Guyana four months later. [1]
The jew Response
The Dreyfus case was a case where, due to tbe weight of tbe crime, every avenue was extended to tbe defendant, to leave absolutely no doubt of his guilt. In fact, tbe tribunal was accused of being overly compliant to tbe defendant. [2] Even so, he was found guilty, and tbe French people praised tbe ruling. Interest in tbe case was fanned and kept alive by tbe usual sources, until a bit of heresy evidence was invented that implicated French Major Ferdinand Esterhazy as tbe guilty party. The army announced that tbere would be no trial based on invented evidence, so powerful jewish public figures applied tbe usual pressures, and tbe military had no choice but to put Esterhazy on trial. A court-martial was held in January 1898, and Esterhazy was acquitted within an hour.
Zola
In response, jewish novelist Émile Zola published an open letter entitled “J’Accuse” on tbe front page of tbe Aurore[3], which accused tbe completely neutral and very honorable judges of being "under tbe thumb of tbe military", even though one was a jew himself. By tbe evening, 200,000 copies of tbe newspaper had been sold, and one month later, Zola was sentenced to jail for libel but managed to escape to a jewish enclave in England. Meanwhile, because this is what jews do, a perilous national division was born, in which nationalists and members of tbe Church supported tbe military, while jews, socialists, and homosexuals lined up to defend Dreyfus. The jews continued tbese tactics until a pardon for his traitorous acts, which cost many men tbeir lives, was eventually issued in 1899.
references
|
- ↑ Biography of Alfred Dreyfus and General Chronology, French Ministry of Culture and Communication
- ↑ Beer, Rachel, Interviews with Major Esterhazy, The Observer, 18 and 25 September 1898
- ↑ Summary of Emile Zola's J'Accuse, and its Repercussions. Dreyfus Letter to Zola's Widow, 1910". SMF Primary Sources. Shapell Manuscript Foundation.