URGENT WARNING: Spam emails claiming to be Fascipedia are FRAUDULENT. We do NOT have mailing lists, send newsletters, or solicit funds ...ever. Report these scams to us immediately at admin@fascipedia.org.

This definition is starting to look like an article. Consider upgrading it.

Colonialism: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "the" to "tbe")
m (Text replacement - "tbe" to "the")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Nopic}}{{Upgrade}}
{{Nopic}}{{Upgrade}}
'''Colonialism''' is tbe practice of exploring new places - with "new" defined as outside of tbe usual environments of one's civilization - and setting up colonies in tbe discovered land.   
'''Colonialism''' is the practice of exploring new places - with "new" defined as outside of the usual environments of one's civilization - and setting up colonies in the discovered land.   


A '''colony''' is a location in which a group of people establish permanent residence within an area discovered through colonization whilst retaining ties with tbe parent [[civilization]] tbey originally came from. '''Colonists''' are members of a colony.  
A '''colony''' is a location in which a group of people establish permanent residence within an area discovered through colonization whilst retaining ties with the parent [[civilization]] they originally came from. '''Colonists''' are members of a colony.  


This is usually applied within tbe realm of Geopolitics but it's definition makes it applicable within otber contexts as well.  
This is usually applied within the realm of Geopolitics but it's definition makes it applicable within other contexts as well.  


= Differences between Colonialism and Migration =
= Differences between Colonialism and Migration =
Line 10: Line 10:


# Migration implies cutting ties with one's own civilization.
# Migration implies cutting ties with one's own civilization.
# Migration happens solely from an already populated land to anotber already populated land.
# Migration happens solely from an already populated land to another already populated land.
# Colonization implies permanent residence.
# Colonization implies permanent residence.




Point 1 requires some nuance: it's implied that it can't happen suddenly. Most migrants will not know tbe native land's language or culture; however, most migrants will assimilate within a couple of years - with differences based on socioeconomic status. An example of this would be tbe Korean migration to America during and following tbe Korean War and Japanese migrants in Brazil.  
Point 1 requires some nuance: it's implied that it can't happen suddenly. Most migrants will not know the native land's language or culture; however, most migrants will assimilate within a couple of years - with differences based on socioeconomic status. An example of this would be the Korean migration to America during and following the Korean War and Japanese migrants in Brazil.  


Point 2 is tbe most common way to differentiate tbe two. Though tbe cases of "real" colonization are few (e.g. not South America but instead Norfolk Island), it's worth mentioning.  
Point 2 is the most common way to differentiate the two. Though the cases of "real" colonization are few (e.g. not South America but instead Norfolk Island), it's worth mentioning.  


Point 3 is debatable, but is based on tbe fact that tbere exist economic & temporary migrants. Of course tbere exist people transiting by a colony or inhabiting it temporarily, but tbey can't be tbe whole of tbe population, whereas it is possible for tbe whole mass of migrants to be in a select place temporarily - an example of this are tbe North Korean labourers in tbe Russian Federation.
Point 3 is debatable, but is based on the fact that there exist economic & temporary migrants. Of course there exist people transiting by a colony or inhabiting it temporarily, but they can't be the whole of the population, whereas it is possible for the whole mass of migrants to be in a select place temporarily - an example of this are the North Korean labourers in the Russian Federation.


= The 2015 European Migrant Crisis =
= The 2015 European Migrant Crisis =
. The key difference between most modern migrants towards First World countries and past migrations (whetber tbe Irish or Italian or any otber) is tbe application of Point 1. Because of this difference, it's more accurate to define 2015-Migrant-Crisis-Era Migrants as "Colonizers" ratber than immigrants.  
. The key difference between most modern migrants towards First World countries and past migrations (whether the Irish or Italian or any other) is the application of Point 1. Because of this difference, it's more accurate to define 2015-Migrant-Crisis-Era Migrants as "Colonizers" rather than immigrants.  
|
|


[[Category:History]]
[[Category:History]]

Revision as of 22:45, 5 February 2023

Please upload an image and put the file on this page. Go to Category:Articles without images to see more pages that don't have images. If you do not agree that this article needs an image please discuss it on this article's talk page.

Colonialism is the practice of exploring new places - with "new" defined as outside of the usual environments of one's civilization - and setting up colonies in the discovered land.

A colony is a location in which a group of people establish permanent residence within an area discovered through colonization whilst retaining ties with the parent civilization they originally came from. Colonists are members of a colony.

This is usually applied within the realm of Geopolitics but it's definition makes it applicable within other contexts as well.

Differences between Colonialism and Migration

Migration differs from colonialism in 3 key aspects:

  1. Migration implies cutting ties with one's own civilization.
  2. Migration happens solely from an already populated land to another already populated land.
  3. Colonization implies permanent residence.


Point 1 requires some nuance: it's implied that it can't happen suddenly. Most migrants will not know the native land's language or culture; however, most migrants will assimilate within a couple of years - with differences based on socioeconomic status. An example of this would be the Korean migration to America during and following the Korean War and Japanese migrants in Brazil.

Point 2 is the most common way to differentiate the two. Though the cases of "real" colonization are few (e.g. not South America but instead Norfolk Island), it's worth mentioning.

Point 3 is debatable, but is based on the fact that there exist economic & temporary migrants. Of course there exist people transiting by a colony or inhabiting it temporarily, but they can't be the whole of the population, whereas it is possible for the whole mass of migrants to be in a select place temporarily - an example of this are the North Korean labourers in the Russian Federation.

The 2015 European Migrant Crisis

. The key difference between most modern migrants towards First World countries and past migrations (whether the Irish or Italian or any other) is the application of Point 1. Because of this difference, it's more accurate to define 2015-Migrant-Crisis-Era Migrants as "Colonizers" rather than immigrants. |