Received view of theories: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science") |
m (Text replacement - "]]]]" to "]]") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''received view of theories''' is a position in the [[philosophy of Science [[Category:Science | The '''received view of theories''' is a position in the [[philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]] that identifies a scientific [[theory]] with a set of propositions which are considered to be linguistic objects, such as axioms. Frederick Suppe describes the position of the received view by saying that it identifies scientific theories with "axiomatic calculi in which theoretical terms are given a partial observation interpretation by mean of correspondence rules."<ref>Suppe, Frederick (1989). ''The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism''. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. p. 38.</ref> The received view is generally associated with the [[Logical positivism|logical empiricists]]. | ||
Recently, the received view of theories has been displaced by the [[semantic view of theories]] as the dominant position in [[theory]] formulation in the philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Suppe |first1=Frederick |year=1998 |title=Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998 |journal=Philosophy of Science |volume=67 |pages=S102–S115 |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/Suppe_2000.pdf |access-date=14 February 2013 |doi=10.1086/392812}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Halvorson |first1=Hans |year=2012 |title=What Scientific Theories Could Not Be |journal=Philosophy of Science |volume=79 |issue=2 |pages=183–206 |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/halvorson2012.pdf |access-date=14 February 2013 |doi=10.1086/664745|citeseerx=10.1.1.692.8455 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Frigg |first1=Roman | year=2006 |title=Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories |journal=Theoria |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=183–206 |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |url=http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2926/1/Scientific_Representation.pdf |access-date=14 February 2013}}</ref> | Recently, the received view of theories has been displaced by the [[semantic view of theories]] as the dominant position in [[theory]] formulation in the philosophy of Science [[Category:Science]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Suppe |first1=Frederick |year=1998 |title=Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998 |journal=Philosophy of Science |volume=67 |pages=S102–S115 |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/Suppe_2000.pdf |access-date=14 February 2013 |doi=10.1086/392812}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Halvorson |first1=Hans |year=2012 |title=What Scientific Theories Could Not Be |journal=Philosophy of Science |volume=79 |issue=2 |pages=183–206 |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/halvorson2012.pdf |access-date=14 February 2013 |doi=10.1086/664745|citeseerx=10.1.1.692.8455 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Frigg |first1=Roman | year=2006 |title=Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories |journal=Theoria |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=183–206 |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |url=http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2926/1/Scientific_Representation.pdf |access-date=14 February 2013}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 12:17, 14 February 2023
The received view of theories is a position in the [[philosophy of Science that identifies a scientific theory with a set of propositions which are considered to be linguistic objects, such as axioms. Frederick Suppe describes the position of the received view by saying that it identifies scientific theories with "axiomatic calculi in which theoretical terms are given a partial observation interpretation by mean of correspondence rules."[1] The received view is generally associated with the logical empiricists. Recently, the received view of theories has been displaced by the semantic view of theories as the dominant position in theory formulation in the philosophy of Science.[2][3][4]
References
- ↑ Suppe, Frederick (1989). The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. p. 38.
- ↑ Suppe, Frederick (1998). "Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998". Philosophy of Science 67: S102–S115. doi:10.1086/392812. https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/Suppe_2000.pdf. Retrieved 14 February 2013.
- ↑ Halvorson, Hans (2012). "What Scientific Theories Could Not Be". Philosophy of Science 79 (2): 183–206. doi:10.1086/664745. https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/halvorson2012.pdf. Retrieved 14 February 2013.
- ↑ Frigg, Roman (2006). "Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories". Theoria (The University of Chicago Press) 55 (2): 183–206. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2926/1/Scientific_Representation.pdf. Retrieved 14 February 2013.