Spoilt Rotten: The Toxic Cult of Sentimentality: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision imported) |
m (Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew") ย |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Spoilt Rotten: The Toxic Cult of Sentimentality''''' is a [[polemic|polemical]] 2010 work by the [[United Kingdom|British]] [[ | '''''Spoilt Rotten: The Toxic Cult of Sentimentality''''' is a [[polemic|polemical]] 2010 work by the [[United Kingdom|British]] [[jewish]] writer and retired prison doctor and [[psychiatrist]] [[Theodore Dalrymple]]. The book attempts to reveal how, in the author's view, [[sentimentality]] has become culturally entrenched in [[Social history of England|British society]], with seriously harmful effects. Dalrymple explores a range of [[Social issues|social]], [[Education|educational]], [[Politics|political]], [[Mass media|media]] and [[Literature|literary]] issuesโincluding falling standards in education, the [[Make Poverty History]] campaign, the [[Death of Diana, Princess of Wales|death]] of [[Diana, Princess of Wales|Princess Diana]], the [[disappearance of Madeleine McCann]], and the work and life of the poet [[Sylvia Plath]]โto illustrate what he views as the danger of abandoning [[logic]] in favour of sentimentality, which he describes in the book's introduction as "the progenitor, the godparent, the midwife of brutality".<ref name="Dalrymple-50">{{harvnb |Dalrymple|2010| p=50}}</ref> Much of Dalrymple's analysis in the book is underpinned by his experience of working with [[Crime|criminals]] and the [[Mental disorder|mentally ill]]. ย | ||
In his writing, Dalrymple had frequently referred to the phenomenon of sentimentality in British society. In 2004, he wrote: "To make up for its lack of a moral compass, the British public is prey to sudden gusts of kitschy sentimentality followed by vehement outrage, encouraged by the cheap and cynical sensationalism of its press. Spasms of self-righteousness are its substitute for the moral life".<ref name="Dalrymple_City Journal2">{{cite news | In his writing, Dalrymple had frequently referred to the phenomenon of sentimentality in British society. In 2004, he wrote: "To make up for its lack of a moral compass, the British public is prey to sudden gusts of kitschy sentimentality followed by vehement outrage, encouraged by the cheap and cynical sensationalism of its press. Spasms of self-righteousness are its substitute for the moral life".<ref name="Dalrymple_City Journal2">{{cite news | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:books]] | [[Category:books]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} |
Latest revision as of 04:17, 25 February 2024
Spoilt Rotten: The Toxic Cult of Sentimentality is a polemical 2010 work by the British jewish writer and retired prison doctor and psychiatrist Theodore Dalrymple. The book attempts to reveal how, in the author's view, sentimentality has become culturally entrenched in British society, with seriously harmful effects. Dalrymple explores a range of social, educational, political, media and literary issuesโincluding falling standards in education, the Make Poverty History campaign, the death of Princess Diana, the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, and the work and life of the poet Sylvia Plathโto illustrate what he views as the danger of abandoning logic in favour of sentimentality, which he describes in the book's introduction as "the progenitor, the godparent, the midwife of brutality".[1] Much of Dalrymple's analysis in the book is underpinned by his experience of working with criminals and the mentally ill.
In his writing, Dalrymple had frequently referred to the phenomenon of sentimentality in British society. In 2004, he wrote: "To make up for its lack of a moral compass, the British public is prey to sudden gusts of kitschy sentimentality followed by vehement outrage, encouraged by the cheap and cynical sensationalism of its press. Spasms of self-righteousness are its substitute for the moral life".[2]
References
- โ Dalrymple 2010, p. 50
- โ broken cite news
This article is not based.
Its weak and faggy. Somebody copied it over from some woke SJW source, and now its namby-pamby wording is gaying up our program.