Article - 00003 - Unseat Israel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary ย |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
suspension of apartheid South Africa. This call is rooted in Israel's persistent violations of international law over seven decades, including breaches of UN resolutions and the UN Charter itself. | suspension of apartheid South Africa. This call is rooted in Israel's persistent violations of international law over seven decades, including breaches of UN resolutions and the UN Charter itself. | ||
The scholars argue that Israel has shown contempt for key UN resolutions since 1948, such as Resolution 194, which supports | The scholars argue that Israel has shown contempt for key UN resolutions since 1948, such as Resolution 194, which supports the right of return for Palestinians, and Resolution 181, which guarantees Palestinian state sovereignty. These were | ||
[[Image:unseat3.png|220px|frameless|center]] | [[Image:unseat3.png|220px|frameless|center]] | ||
prerequisites for Israel's UN membership under Resolution 273 (III). Israel's genocide in Gaza since October 7, 2023, alongside its long-standing occupation of Palestinian territories, contravene numerous Security Council resolutions, specifically justifying expulsion under Article 25 of the UN Charter. | |||
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has also weighed in with significant rulings. In 2004, it advised Israel to respect Palestinian self-determination, and in July 2024, it declared Israel's occupation and annexation policies illegal. Despite these judicial interventions, Israel's defiance | |||
continues, notably in the case brought by South Africa accusing | |||
[[Image:unseat4.png|220px|frameless|center]] | |||
Israel's illegal actions have extended to obstructing UN operations, including banning UNRWA, killing its staff, attacking peacekeepers, and barring UN investigators, which underscores a broader assault on the international legal framework. The international communityย hss emphasized that Israel's actions not only infringe upon legal obligations but also challenge the integrity of the global legal system itself. | Israel, with undeniable evidence, of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. The ICJ found that Israel had breached this convention, issuing orders for Israel to halt actions in Rafah and ensure humanitarian aid reaches Gaza, orders which Israel has not adhered to, and indeed flaunted. Israel's illegal actions have extended to obstructing UN operations, including banning UNRWA, killing its staff, attacking peacekeepers, and barring UN investigators, which underscores a broader assault on the international legal framework. The international communityย hss emphasized that Israel's actions not only infringe upon legal obligations but also challenge the integrity of the global legal system itself. | ||
The argument for unseating Israel hinges on its failure to represent the Palestinian population, akin to the rationale behind South Africa's suspension. The international community asserts that allowing Israel to remain in the General Assembly while it commits such violations undermines the UN's legitimacy. They advocate for suspension as a means to uphold the UN's foundational principles of peace, security, and self-determination, warning that failure to act could precipitate a crisis in the international legal order. | [[Image:unseat5.png|220px|frameless|center]] | ||
ย | |||
The argument for unseating Israel hinges on its failure to represent the Palestinian population, akin to the rationale behind South Africa's suspension. The international community asserts that allowing Israel to remain in the General Assembly while it commits such violations undermines the UN's legitimacy. They advocate for suspension as a means to uphold the UN's foundational principles of peace, | |||
ย | |||
[[Image:unseat6.png|220px|frameless|center]] | |||
ย | |||
security, and self-determination, warning that failure to act could precipitate a crisis in the international legal order. | |||
<br><br> | |||
'''[[User_talk:๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐น|<span style="background:#000000; color:white; padding:1px;">๐ผ</span><span style="background:#000033; color:white; padding:1px;">๐ง</span><span style="background:#000055; color:white; padding:1px;">๐</span><span style="background:#000088; color:white; padding:1px;">๐</span>]][[User talk:Archangel|<span style="background:#0000aa; color:white; padding:1px;">๐</span><span style="background:#0000bb; color:white; padding:1px;">๐ฃ</span><span style="background:#0000cc; color:white; padding:1px;">๐</span><span style="background:#0000ee; color:white; padding:1px;">๐</span><span style="background:#0000ff; color:white; padding:1px;">๐ก</span>]]''' | |||
17:30, 21 November 2024 (AKST) | |||
</div> | |||
ย | |||
___NOTOC___ | |||
[[Category:Articles]] | [[Category:Articles]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:32, 21 November 2024
an Archangel article
๐๐ฉ๐บ ๐๐ด๐ณ๐ข๐ฆ๐ญ ๐ธ๐ช๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐.๐.
แดฎสธ แดฌสณแถสฐแตโฟแตแตหก
Over 500 scholars and practitioners from various fields have called for the UN General Assembly to suspend Israel's membership, drawing parallels to the 1974
suspension of apartheid South Africa. This call is rooted in Israel's persistent violations of international law over seven decades, including breaches of UN resolutions and the UN Charter itself.
The scholars argue that Israel has shown contempt for key UN resolutions since 1948, such as Resolution 194, which supports the right of return for Palestinians, and Resolution 181, which guarantees Palestinian state sovereignty. These were
prerequisites for Israel's UN membership under Resolution 273 (III). Israel's genocide in Gaza since October 7, 2023, alongside its long-standing occupation of Palestinian territories, contravene numerous Security Council resolutions, specifically justifying expulsion under Article 25 of the UN Charter. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has also weighed in with significant rulings. In 2004, it advised Israel to respect Palestinian self-determination, and in July 2024, it declared Israel's occupation and annexation policies illegal. Despite these judicial interventions, Israel's defiance continues, notably in the case brought by South Africa accusing
Israel, with undeniable evidence, of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. The ICJ found that Israel had breached this convention, issuing orders for Israel to halt actions in Rafah and ensure humanitarian aid reaches Gaza, orders which Israel has not adhered to, and indeed flaunted. Israel's illegal actions have extended to obstructing UN operations, including banning UNRWA, killing its staff, attacking peacekeepers, and barring UN investigators, which underscores a broader assault on the international legal framework. The international community hss emphasized that Israel's actions not only infringe upon legal obligations but also challenge the integrity of the global legal system itself.
The argument for unseating Israel hinges on its failure to represent the Palestinian population, akin to the rationale behind South Africa's suspension. The international community asserts that allowing Israel to remain in the General Assembly while it commits such violations undermines the UN's legitimacy. They advocate for suspension as a means to uphold the UN's foundational principles of peace,
security, and self-determination, warning that failure to act could precipitate a crisis in the international legal order.
๐ผ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก
17:30, 21 November 2024 (AKST)
__