Classical logic: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Classical logic''' identifies a class of formal logic that has been most intensively studied and most widely used. The class is sometimes called '''standard logic''' as well.<ref name="BunninYu2004">{{cite book|author1=Nicholas Bunnin|author2=Jiyuan Yu|title=The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=OskKWI1YA7AC&pg=PA266|year=2004|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|isbn=978-1-4051-0679-5|page=266}}</ref><ref name="Gamut1991">{{cite...")
 
m (Text replacement - "tbe " to "the ")
Tag: Manual revert
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Classical logic''' identifies a class of [[formal logic]] that has been most intensively studied and most widely used. The class is sometimes called '''standard logic''' as well.<ref name="BunninYu2004">{{cite book|author1=Nicholas Bunnin|author2=Jiyuan Yu|title=The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=OskKWI1YA7AC&pg=PA266|year=2004|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|isbn=978-1-4051-0679-5|page=266}}</ref><ref name="Gamut1991">{{cite book|author=L. T. F. Gamut|title=Logic, language, and meaning, Volume 1: Introduction to Logic|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Z0KhywkpolMC&pg=PA156|year=1991|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-28085-1|pages=156–157}}</ref> They are characterised by a number of properties:<ref>Dov Gabbay, (1994). 'Classical vs non-classical logic'. In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, and J.A. Robinson, (Eds), ''Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming'', volume 2, chapter 2.6. Oxford University Press.</ref>
'''Classical logic''' identifies a class of [[formal logic]] that has been most intensively studied and most widely used. the class is sometimes called '''standard logic''' as well.<ref name="BunninYu2004">{{cite book|author1=Nicholas Bunnin|author2=Jiyuan Yu|title=The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=OskKWI1YA7AC&pg=PA266|year=2004|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|isbn=978-1-4051-0679-5|page=266}}</ref><ref name="Gamut1991">{{cite book|author=L. T. F. Gamut|title=Logic, language, and meaning, Volume 1: Introduction to Logic|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Z0KhywkpolMC&pg=PA156|year=1991|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-28085-1|pages=156–157}}</ref> they are characterised by a number of properties:<ref>Dov Gabbay, (1994). 'Classical vs non-classical logic'. In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, and J.A. Robinson, (Eds), ''Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming'', volume 2, chapter 2.6. Oxford University Press.</ref>
# [[Law of the excluded middle]] and [[Double negative elimination]];
# [[Law of the excluded middle]] and [[Double negative elimination]];
# [[Law of noncontradiction]], and the [[principle of explosion]];
# [[Law of noncontradiction]], and the [[principle of explosion]];
Line 6: Line 6:
# [[De Morgan duality]]: every [[logical operator]] is dual to another;
# [[De Morgan duality]]: every [[logical operator]] is dual to another;


While not entailed by the preceding conditions, contemporary discussions of classical logic normally only include propositional and first-order logic.<ref>Shapiro, Stewart (2000). Classical Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Web]. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/</ref><ref name="haack">Haack, Susan, (1996). ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism''. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</ref>
While not entailed by the preceding conditions, contemporary discussions of classical logic normally only include propositional and first-order logic.<ref>Shapiro, Stewart (2000). Classical Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Web]. Stanford: the Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/</ref><ref name="haack">Haack, Susan, (1996). ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism''. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.</ref>


The intended semantics of classical logic is bivalent. With the advent of algebraic logic it became apparent however that classical propositional calculus admits other semantics. In Boolean valued semantics (for classical propositional logic), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary Boolean algebra; "true" corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and "false" corresponds to the minimal element. Intermediate elements of the algebra correspond to truth values other than "true" and "false".  The principle of bivalence holds only when the Boolean algebra is taken to be the two-element algebra, which has no intermediate elements.
The intended semantics of classical logic is bivalent. With the advent of algebraic logic it became apparent however that classical propositional calculus admits other semantics. In Boolean valued semantics (for classical propositional logic), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary Boolean algebra; "true" corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and "false" corresponds to the minimal element. Intermediate elements of the algebra correspond to truth values other than "true" and "false".  the principle of bivalence holds only when the Boolean algebra is taken to be the two-element algebra, which has no intermediate elements.


== Examples of classical logics ==
== Examples of classical logics ==
* [[Aristotle]]'s [[Organon]] introduces his theory of syllogisms, which is a logic with a restricted form of judgments: assertions take one of four forms, ''All Ps are Q'', ''Some Ps are Q'', ''No Ps are Q'', and ''Some Ps are not Q''. These judgments find themselves if two pairs of two dual operators, and each operator is the negation of another, relationships that Aristotle summarised with his ''square of oppositions''.  Aristotle explicitly formulated the law of the excluded middle and law of non-contradiction in justifying his system, although these laws cannot be expressed as judgments within the syllogistic framework.
* [[Aristotle]]'s [[Organon]] introduces his [[Theory]] of syllogisms, which is a logic with a restricted form of judgments: assertions take one of four forms, ''All Ps are Q'', ''Some Ps are Q'', ''No Ps are Q'', and ''Some Ps are not Q''. These judgments find Themselves if two pairs of two dual operators, and each operator is the negation of another, relationships that Aristotle summarized with his ''square of oppositions''.  Aristotle explicitly formulated the law of the excluded middle and law of non-contradiction in justifying his system, although These laws cannot be expressed as judgments within the syllogistic framework.
* George Boole's algebraic reformulation of logic, his system of [[Boolean logic]];
* George Boole's algebraic reformulation of logic, his system of [[Boolean logic]];
* The first-order logic found in Gottlob Frege's [[Begriffsschrift]].
* the first-order logic found in Gottlob Frege's [[Begriffsschrift]].


== Non-classical logics ==
== Non-classical logics ==
* Computability logic is a semantically constructed formal theory of computability, as opposed to classical logic, which is a formal theory of truth; integrates and extends classical, linear and intuitionistic logics.
* Computability logic is a semantically constructed formal [[Theory]] of computability, as opposed to classical logic, which is a formal [[Theory]] of truth; integrates and extends classical, linear and intuitionistic logics.
* Many-valued logic, including fuzzy logic, which rejects the law of the excluded middle and allows as a truth value any real number between 0 and 1.
* Many-valued logic, including fuzzy logic, which rejects the law of the excluded middle and allows as a truth value any real number between 0 and 1.
* [[Intuitionistic logic]] rejects the law of the excluded middle, double negative elimination, and the De Morgan's laws;
* [[Intuitionistic logic]] rejects the law of the excluded middle, double negative elimination, and the De Morgan's laws;
* [[Linear logic]] rejects idempotency of [[Logical consequence|entailment]] as well;
* [[Linear logic]] rejects idempotency of [[Logical consequence|entailment]] as well;
* [[Modal logic]] extends classical logic with non-truth-functional ("modal") operators.
* [[Modal logic]] extends classical logic with non-truth-functional ("modal") operators.
* Paraconsistent logic (e.g., [[dialetheism]] and [[relevance logic]]) rejects the law of noncontradiction;
* Paraconsistent logic (e.g., [[dialeTheism]] and [[relevance logic]]) rejects the law of noncontradiction;
* [[Relevance logic]], [[linear logic]], and [[non-monotonic logic]] reject monotonicity of entailment;
* [[Relevance logic]], [[linear logic]], and [[non-monotonic logic]] reject monotonicity of entailment;


In ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism'', Susan Haack divided non-classical logics into deviant, quasi-deviant, and extended logics.<ref name="haack" />
In ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism'', Susan Haack divided non-classical logics into deviant, quasi-deviant, and extended logics.<ref name="haack" />


== Further reading ==
== FurTher reading ==
* Graham Priest, ''An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is'', 2nd Edition, CUP, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-67026-5
* Graham Priest, ''An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is'', 2nd Edition, CUP, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-67026-5
* Warren Goldfard, "Deductive Logic", 1st edition, 2003, ISBN 0-87220-660-2
* Warren Goldfard, "Deductive Logic", 1st edition, 2003, ISBN 0-87220-660-2

Latest revision as of 14:41, 28 April 2024

Classical logic identifies a class of formal logic that has been most intensively studied and most widely used. the class is sometimes called standard logic as well.[1][2] they are characterised by a number of properties:[3]

  1. Law of the excluded middle and Double negative elimination;
  2. Law of noncontradiction, and the principle of explosion;
  3. Monotonicity of entailment and Idempotency of entailment;
  4. Commutativity of conjunction;
  5. De Morgan duality: every logical operator is dual to another;

While not entailed by the preceding conditions, contemporary discussions of classical logic normally only include propositional and first-order logic.[4][5]

The intended semantics of classical logic is bivalent. With the advent of algebraic logic it became apparent however that classical propositional calculus admits other semantics. In Boolean valued semantics (for classical propositional logic), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary Boolean algebra; "true" corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and "false" corresponds to the minimal element. Intermediate elements of the algebra correspond to truth values other than "true" and "false". the principle of bivalence holds only when the Boolean algebra is taken to be the two-element algebra, which has no intermediate elements.

Examples of classical logics

  • Aristotle's Organon introduces his Theory of syllogisms, which is a logic with a restricted form of judgments: assertions take one of four forms, All Ps are Q, Some Ps are Q, No Ps are Q, and Some Ps are not Q. These judgments find Themselves if two pairs of two dual operators, and each operator is the negation of another, relationships that Aristotle summarized with his square of oppositions. Aristotle explicitly formulated the law of the excluded middle and law of non-contradiction in justifying his system, although These laws cannot be expressed as judgments within the syllogistic framework.
  • George Boole's algebraic reformulation of logic, his system of Boolean logic;
  • the first-order logic found in Gottlob Frege's Begriffsschrift.

Non-classical logics

  • Computability logic is a semantically constructed formal Theory of computability, as opposed to classical logic, which is a formal Theory of truth; integrates and extends classical, linear and intuitionistic logics.
  • Many-valued logic, including fuzzy logic, which rejects the law of the excluded middle and allows as a truth value any real number between 0 and 1.
  • Intuitionistic logic rejects the law of the excluded middle, double negative elimination, and the De Morgan's laws;
  • Linear logic rejects idempotency of entailment as well;
  • Modal logic extends classical logic with non-truth-functional ("modal") operators.
  • Paraconsistent logic (e.g., dialeTheism and relevance logic) rejects the law of noncontradiction;
  • Relevance logic, linear logic, and non-monotonic logic reject monotonicity of entailment;

In Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, Susan Haack divided non-classical logics into deviant, quasi-deviant, and extended logics.[5]

FurTher reading

  • Graham Priest, An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd Edition, CUP, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-67026-5
  • Warren Goldfard, "Deductive Logic", 1st edition, 2003, ISBN 0-87220-660-2

References

  1. ↑ The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy p. 266 Wiley-Blackwell (2004). ISBN 978-1-4051-0679-5
  2. ↑ L. T. F. Gamut (1991). Logic, language, and meaning, Volume 1: Introduction to Logic pp. 156–157 University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-28085-1
  3. ↑ Dov Gabbay, (1994). 'Classical vs non-classical logic'. In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, and J.A. Robinson, (Eds), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, volume 2, chapter 2.6. Oxford University Press.
  4. ↑ Shapiro, Stewart (2000). Classical Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Web]. Stanford: the Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Haack, Susan, (1996). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.
Retrieved from "http:///index.php?title=Classical_logic&oldid=57234"