Radioactive atomic death ray: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#seo:
|title=Radioactive Atomic Deathray
|title_mode=replace
|keywords=fascism, culture,
|description=Evidence presented during the Nuremburg trials claimed Hitler had an atomic death ray which he used to vaporize jewish towns.
|image=nazideathray1.png
|image_alt=Wiki Logo
}}
[[File:nazideathray1.png|thumb|250px|Sensational story about the RAF supposedly destroying the death ray, which never existed. Written by a [[jew]] of course.]][[File:nazideathray2.png|thumb|250px|Nuremburg Trial Testimony. Read [[File:nazideathray3.pdf]] Transcript with commentary.]]
[[File:nazideathray1.png|thumb|250px|Sensational story about the RAF supposedly destroying the death ray, which never existed. Written by a [[jew]] of course.]][[File:nazideathray2.png|thumb|250px|Nuremburg Trial Testimony. Read [[File:nazideathray3.pdf]] Transcript with commentary.]]
[[File:nycdeathray.png|thumb|250px|As the story was already beginning to not age well, the jew-owned New York Times attempted to morph the death ray lie into an A-bomb lie.]]
[[File:nycdeathray.png|thumb|250px|As the story was already beginning to not age well, the jew-owned New York Times attempted to morph the death ray lie into an A-bomb lie.]]
[[File:deathrayphoto.png|thumb|250px|This photo, clearly taken after the war and heavily altered, was intoduced into evidence at the Nuremburg Trials.]]
[[File:deathrayphoto.png|thumb|250px|This photo of a firetruck, clearly taken after the war and heavily altered, was intoduced into evidence at the Nuremburg Trials.]]


This one piece of evidence alone should be enough to make any reasonable thinking person question the holocaust narrative. And there are literally hundreds of such stories.  
This one piece of evidence alone should be enough to make any reasonable thinking person question the holocaust narrative. And there are literally hundreds of such stories.  
Line 55: Line 63:
of shooting and gassing and burning, as it had been carried out, and this is the  
of shooting and gassing and burning, as it had been carried out, and this is the  
experiment, as I am advised. A village, a small village was provisionally erected,  
experiment, as I am advised. A village, a small village was provisionally erected,  
with temporary structures, and in it approximately 20,000 Jews were put. By  
with temporary structures, and in it approximately 20,000 jews were put. By  
means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 people were  
means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 people were  
eradicated almost instantaneously, and in such a way that there was no trace left  
eradicated almost instantaneously, and in such a way that there was no trace left  
Line 116: Line 124:


It was upon proceedings such as this, that people were murdered by hanging, and a  
It was upon proceedings such as this, that people were murdered by hanging, and a  
mythological exaggeration of the Holocaust was founded. This prototype has been  
mythological exaggeration of the Holohoax was founded. This prototype has been  
used to generate similar atrocity fakery ever since, driving propaganda fueled wars  
used to generate similar atrocity fakery ever since, driving propaganda fueled wars  
through to this very day.  
through to this very day.  
Line 133: Line 141:
</poem>
</poem>


[[Category:False_narratives]]
[[Category:False narratives]]

Latest revision as of 23:22, 20 November 2024

Sensational story about the RAF supposedly destroying the death ray, which never existed. Written by a jew of course.
Nuremburg Trial Testimony. Read File:Nazideathray3.pdf Transcript with commentary.
As the story was already beginning to not age well, the jew-owned New York Times attempted to morph the death ray lie into an A-bomb lie.
This photo of a firetruck, clearly taken after the war and heavily altered, was intoduced into evidence at the Nuremburg Trials.

This one piece of evidence alone should be enough to make any reasonable thinking person question the holocaust narrative. And there are literally hundreds of such stories. Men were executed over these stories.


Nuremburg trial testimony

ONE HUNDRED
AND SIXTIETH DAY
Friday, 21 June 1946

Morning Session

[The Defendant Albert Speer resumed the stand.] (page 529)



[...]



"MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And certain experiments were also conducted and

certain researches conducted in atomic energy, were they not?



SPEER: We had not got as far as that, unfortunately, because the finest experts we
had in atomic research had emigrated to America, and this had thrown us back a great
deal in our research, so that we still needed another year or two in order to achieve any
results in the splitting of the atom.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: The policy of driving people out who didn't agree with
Germany hadn't produced very good dividends, had it?

SPEER: Especially in this sphere it was a great disadvantage to us.



(Robert H. Jackson, c. 1945,
presided over "war crimes trials"; and
believed in the German "Atomic
Disintegration Device. " )

JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, I have certain information, which was placed in my hands, of an experiment which was carried out near Auschwitz and I would like to ask you if you heard about it or knew about it. The purpose of the experiment was to find a quick and complete way of destroying people without the delay and trouble of shooting and gassing and burning, as it had been carried out, and this is the experiment, as I am advised. A village, a small village was provisionally erected, with temporary structures, and in it approximately 20,000 jews were put. By means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 people were eradicated almost instantaneously, and in such a way that there was no trace left of them; that it developed, the explosive developed, temperatures of from 400° to 500° centigrade and destroyed them without leaving any trace at all.



Do you know about that experiment?



SPEER: No, and I consider it utterly improbable.
(Note: He actually said "impossible" here. This was mistranslated.)



PRESUMED GUILTY

Note also the presumption of guilt, embedded within the accusation, for which there was
obviously never a shred of actual evidence - i.e., "shooting and gassing and
burning, as it had been carried out."


Against such baseless and bizarre accusations, none of the accused after Hermann Goering were allowed to make any effective defense.


Obviously, this whole story was supposed to
open the door for an explanation for the
miraculous disappearance of millions of
jews, and other people supposedly
murdered, so that the prosecution would
never have to provide any evidence at
all; because it had been "atomically
disintegrated!"

Albert Speer was found guilty of war
crimes and crimes against humanity, though
he was acquitted on the other two counts.
On October 1, 1946, he was sentenced to
20 years' imprisonment. While three of the
eight judges (two Soviet and one American,
Francis Biddle) initially advocated the death
penalty for Speer, the other judges did not,
and a compromise sentence was reached
"after two days' discussion and some rather
bitter horse-trading". - Wi***edia




Unfortunately, this was not an isolated incident. The Nuremburg "show trials" were full
of obviously faked evidence and forged reports, usually submitted from unaccountable
sources, and blithely accepted as "common knowledge" - without any investigation or
allowance for rebuttal.

It was upon proceedings such as this, that people were murdered by hanging, and a
mythological exaggeration of the Holohoax was founded. This prototype has been
used to generate similar atrocity fakery ever since, driving propaganda fueled wars
through to this very day.

How many more people have to die, because psychopathic leaders cannot break their
addiction to lying? When will our mass media change their depraved but easy lives of
acting like cheap whores, and investigate propaganda before reporting it?



NO GEBMAN DOCUMENTS
WHATSOEVER MENTIONING ANY PLAN