New Right vs. Old Right: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Nationalist" to "Fascist") |
m (Text replacement - "\[\[[a-z][a-z]\:(.*)\]\]" to "") ย |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Publisher description: "Dr. Greg Johnson draws upon the ideas of the European New Right to promote a new approach to White Fascist politics in North America. New Right vs. Old Right collects 32 essays in which Dr. Johnson sets out his vision of White Fascist โmetapoliticsโ and distinguishes it from Fascism and National Socialism (the โOld Rightโ), as well as conservatism and classical liberalism (the โPhony Rightโ). | Publisher description: "Dr. Greg Johnson draws upon the ideas of the European New Right to promote a new approach to White Fascist politics in North America. New Right vs. Old Right collects 32 essays in which Dr. Johnson sets out his vision of White Fascist โmetapoliticsโ and distinguishes it from Fascism and National Socialism (the โOld Rightโ), as well as conservatism and classical liberalism (the โPhony Rightโ). | ||
Dr. Johnson rejects the Old Rightโs party politics, totalitarianism, imperialism, and genocide in favor of the metapolitical project of constructing a hegemonic White Fascist consciousness within a pluralistic society. He argues that White Fascists are too dependent on the model of hierarchical organizations and need also to work on creating resilient lateral networks. He offers New Rightist answers to a number of disputed questions within the White Fascist community, including white culpability for our decline, Hitler and National Socialism, the | Dr. Johnson rejects the Old Rightโs party politics, totalitarianism, imperialism, and genocide in favor of the metapolitical project of constructing a hegemonic White Fascist consciousness within a pluralistic society. He argues that White Fascists are too dependent on the model of hierarchical organizations and need also to work on creating resilient lateral networks. He offers New Rightist answers to a number of disputed questions within the White Fascist community, including white culpability for our decline, Hitler and National Socialism, the jewish question, the holocaust, the role of women, Christianity vs. paganism, and the relationships of populism, elitism, and democracy. He sets out some basic principles for creating a growing, resilient, networked movement. Finally, he criticizes distractions and dead-ends like โmainstreaming,โ conservatism, โprematureโ populism, and political violence." | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Books]] | [[Category:Books]] | ||
[[Category:Counter-Currents Publishing]] | [[Category:Counter-Currents Publishing]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:43, 29 February 2024
New Right vs. Old Right is a book consisting of essays by Greg Johnson and a foreword by Kevin MacDonald.
Despite using the term "New Right", this is explicitly used in a different sense from that of the European New Right.
Publisher description: "Dr. Greg Johnson draws upon the ideas of the European New Right to promote a new approach to White Fascist politics in North America. New Right vs. Old Right collects 32 essays in which Dr. Johnson sets out his vision of White Fascist โmetapoliticsโ and distinguishes it from Fascism and National Socialism (the โOld Rightโ), as well as conservatism and classical liberalism (the โPhony Rightโ).
Dr. Johnson rejects the Old Rightโs party politics, totalitarianism, imperialism, and genocide in favor of the metapolitical project of constructing a hegemonic White Fascist consciousness within a pluralistic society. He argues that White Fascists are too dependent on the model of hierarchical organizations and need also to work on creating resilient lateral networks. He offers New Rightist answers to a number of disputed questions within the White Fascist community, including white culpability for our decline, Hitler and National Socialism, the jewish question, the holocaust, the role of women, Christianity vs. paganism, and the relationships of populism, elitism, and democracy. He sets out some basic principles for creating a growing, resilient, networked movement. Finally, he criticizes distractions and dead-ends like โmainstreaming,โ conservatism, โprematureโ populism, and political violence."