Protectionism: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


== Within Economics ==
== Within Economics ==
Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market [[Capitalism]]. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still mantaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.  
Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market [[Capitalism]]. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still maintaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.  


Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.  
Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.  


The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.{{Citation needed}}
The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.


It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.{{Citation needed}}
It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.


== Within Politics ==
== Within Politics ==
Line 18: Line 18:
In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.
In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.
<references />
<references />
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 20:11, 7 April 2023

Please upload an image and put the file on this page. Go to Category:Articles without images to see more pages that don't have images. If you do not agree that this article needs an image please discuss it on this article's talk page.
Edit-clear.png
This article is in need of a clean-up. You can help out FasciPedia by re-organizing parts of the article, checking grammar and spelling, and doing other helpful things to correct the article.


Protectionism refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns.

Within Economics

Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market Capitalism. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still maintaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.

Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism per sé.

The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons[1].

It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.

Within Politics

The position of protectionism is mostly promoted by Populists, particularly on the right (though the "Old Left", contrary to the newer "Progressive Left", also advocated it).

In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.