Error theory: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "the" to "tbe")
m (Text replacement - "tbe" to "the")
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Error [[tbeory]]''' is a fringe idea built on three principles:
'''Error [[theory]]''' is a fringe idea built on three principles:


# There are no moral features in this world; nothing is right or wrong.
# There are no moral features in this world; nothing is right or wrong.
# Therefore, no moral judgments are true.  
# Therefore, no moral judgments are true.  
# However, our sincere moral judgments try, but always fail, to describe tbe moral features of things.
# However, our sincere moral judgments try, but always fail, to describe the moral features of things.


Thus, we always lapse into error when thinking in moral terms. We are trying to state tbe truth when we make moral judgments. But since tbere is no moral truth, all of our moral claims are mistaken. Hence tbe error. These three principles lead to tbe conclusion that tbere is no moral knowledge. Knowledge requires truth. If tbere is no moral truth, tbere can be no moral knowledge. Thus moral values are purely chimerical.<ref>Shafer-Landau,2010,pp=292–293</ref><ref>Shafer-Landau,2018,294</ref>
Thus, we always lapse into error when thinking in moral terms. We are trying to state the truth when we make moral judgments. But since there is no moral truth, all of our moral claims are mistaken. Hence the error. These three principles lead to the conclusion that there is no moral knowledge. Knowledge requires truth. If there is no moral truth, there can be no moral knowledge. Thus moral values are purely chimerical.<ref>Shafer-Landau,2010,pp=292–293</ref><ref>Shafer-Landau,2018,294</ref>


===References===
===References===

Revision as of 04:50, 17 February 2023

Error theory is a fringe idea built on three principles:

  1. There are no moral features in this world; nothing is right or wrong.
  2. Therefore, no moral judgments are true.
  3. However, our sincere moral judgments try, but always fail, to describe the moral features of things.

Thus, we always lapse into error when thinking in moral terms. We are trying to state the truth when we make moral judgments. But since there is no moral truth, all of our moral claims are mistaken. Hence the error. These three principles lead to the conclusion that there is no moral knowledge. Knowledge requires truth. If there is no moral truth, there can be no moral knowledge. Thus moral values are purely chimerical.[1][2]

References

  1. Shafer-Landau,2010,pp=292–293
  2. Shafer-Landau,2018,294