URGENT WARNING: Spam emails claiming to be Fascipedia are FRAUDULENT. We do NOT have mailing lists, send newsletters, or solicit funds ...ever. Report these scams to us immediately at admin@fascipedia.org.

Talk:Laura Loomer: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "tbe" to "the")
 
Line 8: Line 8:




::I don't believe there is much there, if anything, from wi***edia, but I probably lifted equal parts from tbe ADL and Conservapedia sites (lifted, processed, sifted, cleaned-up, and made honest) The rest of it, about half of the whole thing, came from the Loomer site. The quote came from her site. Not sure how that can be unbiased. When creating an article about someone like Laura Loomer, I try to keep it somewhere between Neutral and Favorable. I wrote most of it, but I don't really know that much about her. If I missed the mark anywhere, please fix. On the rest of it, I agree. There are some hideous spots. [[User:Bacchus|𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 ]] ([[User talk:Bacchus|talk]]) 22:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
::I don't believe there is much there, if anything, from wi***edia, but I probably lifted equal parts from the ADL and Conservapedia sites (lifted, processed, sifted, cleaned-up, and made honest) The rest of it, about half of the whole thing, came from the Loomer site. The quote came from her site. Not sure how that can be unbiased. When creating an article about someone like Laura Loomer, I try to keep it somewhere between Neutral and Favorable. I wrote most of it, but I don't really know that much about her. If I missed the mark anywhere, please fix. On the rest of it, I agree. There are some hideous spots. [[User:Bacchus|𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 ]] ([[User talk:Bacchus|talk]]) 22:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:54, 10 May 2023

issues -- 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 19:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC) -- 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 19:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Mille, Other than the references being a mess, (and they certainly are), could you list the other issues so we can atteck them? 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 19:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Re: issues -- MilleBracciaAlzate (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Other than references, the picture is formatted weird (compared to other images on the site, maybe it's the abscence of a caption), the quote is of course very much biased, the section under the picture reaches the bottom of the page in a way which isn't particularly aesthetically pleasing and I believe it is pasted largely from Wi***edia.


I don't believe there is much there, if anything, from wi***edia, but I probably lifted equal parts from the ADL and Conservapedia sites (lifted, processed, sifted, cleaned-up, and made honest) The rest of it, about half of the whole thing, came from the Loomer site. The quote came from her site. Not sure how that can be unbiased. When creating an article about someone like Laura Loomer, I try to keep it somewhere between Neutral and Favorable. I wrote most of it, but I don't really know that much about her. If I missed the mark anywhere, please fix. On the rest of it, I agree. There are some hideous spots. 𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 (talk) 22:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)