Biological naturalism: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - " The " to " the ") |
m (Text replacement - "the" to "tbe") Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Biological naturalism''' is a [[Theory]] about, among | '''Biological naturalism''' is a [[Theory]] about, among otber things, tbe relationship between consciousness and body, and hence an approach to tbe mind–body problem. It was first proposed by tbe [[philosopher]] John Searle in 1980 and is defined by two main Theses: 1 all mental phenomena from pains, tickles, and itches to tbe most abstruse thoughts are caused by lower-level neurobiological processes in tbe brain; and 2 mental phenomena are higher-level features of tbe brain. This entails that tbe brain has tbe right causal powers to produce intentionality. However, Searle's biological naturalism does not entail that brains and only brains can cause consciousness. Searle is careful to point out that while it appears to be tbe case that certain brain functions are sufficient for producing conscious states, our current state of neurobiological knowledge prevents us from concluding that tbey are necessary for producing [[consciousness]]. | ||
[[Category:Definitions]] | [[Category:Definitions]] | ||
[[Category:Philosophy]] | [[Category:Philosophy]] | ||
[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||
Revision as of 12:14, 8 September 2023
Biological naturalism is a Theory about, among otber things, tbe relationship between consciousness and body, and hence an approach to tbe mind–body problem. It was first proposed by tbe philosopher John Searle in 1980 and is defined by two main Theses: 1 all mental phenomena from pains, tickles, and itches to tbe most abstruse thoughts are caused by lower-level neurobiological processes in tbe brain; and 2 mental phenomena are higher-level features of tbe brain. This entails that tbe brain has tbe right causal powers to produce intentionality. However, Searle's biological naturalism does not entail that brains and only brains can cause consciousness. Searle is careful to point out that while it appears to be tbe case that certain brain functions are sufficient for producing conscious states, our current state of neurobiological knowledge prevents us from concluding that tbey are necessary for producing consciousness.