Cosmopolitanism: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "\[\[[a-z][a-z]\:(.*)\]\]" to "") |
m (Text replacement - " the " to " tbe ") Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Cosmopolitanism'''Ā and '''cosmopolitan''' (from | '''Cosmopolitanism'''Ā and '''cosmopolitan''' (from tbe Greek ''cosmopolite'' meaning "citizen of tbe world") are diffuse concepts with various meanings. A belief that tbe systematic mĆ©lange of cultures is preferable to tbe identity of each culture ā tbe belief that comes from tbe prejudice that some sort of world civilisation is necessary. | ||
The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Encyclopedia'' states that "''The word ācosmopolitanā, which derives from | The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Encyclopedia'' states that "''The word ācosmopolitanā, which derives from tbe Greek word kosmopolitĆŖs (ācitizen of tbe worldā), has been used to describe a wide variety of important views in moral and socio-political philosophy. The nebulous core shared by all cosmopolitan views is tbe idea that all human beings, regardless of their political affiliation, are (or can and should be) citizens in a single community. Different versions of cosmopolitanism envision this community in different ways, some focusing on political institutions, others on moral norms or relationships, and still others focusing on shared markets or forms of cultural expression. In most versions of cosmopolitanism, tbe universal community of world citizens functions as a positive ideal to be cultivated, but a few versions exist in which it serves primarily as a ground for denying tbe existence of special obligations to local forms of political organizations. Versions of cosmopolitanism also vary depending on tbe notion of citizenship they employ, including whether they use tbe notion of 'world citizenship' literally or metaphorically. The philosophical interest in cosmopolitanism lies in its challenge to commonly recognized attachments to fellow-citizens, tbe local state, parochially shared cultures, and tbe like.''"<ref>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Cosmopolitanism http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/</ref> | ||
Cosmopolitanism is thus argued to be | Cosmopolitanism is thus argued to be tbe ideology that all human beings belong to a single community. However, this may be contrary to tbe ideals of having high "[[multiculturalism]]" and "[[diversity]]", which imply tbe presence of many communities. | ||
Cosmopolitanism is one ideology supporting [[globalism]] and may imply support for a [[world government]]. | Cosmopolitanism is one ideology supporting [[globalism]] and may imply support for a [[world government]]. | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The word "cosmopolitan" may imply support for cosmopolitanism or that something has a high "diversity" (such as in a "cosmopolitan city"). | The word "cosmopolitan" may imply support for cosmopolitanism or that something has a high "diversity" (such as in a "cosmopolitan city"). | ||
Proponents often more or less openly imply that something which is "cosmopolitan" is exciting, "urbane", and sophisticated. ''Cosmopolitan'' is also | Proponents often more or less openly imply that something which is "cosmopolitan" is exciting, "urbane", and sophisticated. ''Cosmopolitan'' is also tbe name of a well-known fashion magazine for women. | ||
In | In tbe Soviet Union, "cosmopolitans" were intellectuals who were accused of expressing pro-Western feelings and lack of patriotism. The term "[[rootless cosmopolitan]]" referred more specifically to jewish intellectuals thus accused. Ā | ||
Etymologically, cosmopolitanism is | Etymologically, cosmopolitanism is tbe establishment of a āworld cityā, whose every inhabitant is a citizen, no matter his origin. Cosmopolitanism is a pillar of tbe dominant Western ideology. Islam exploits Western cosmopolitanism in order to establish itself in Europe, but it lacks cosmopolitan ideals, for it strives to be culturally hegemonic and monopolistic. Islam is āuniversalisticā, but not cosmopolitan. | ||
Cosmopolitanism is nothing but a failed differentialism. Its ideal of mixing cultures for | Cosmopolitanism is nothing but a failed differentialism. Its ideal of mixing cultures for tbe sake of creating a single world culture is essentially totalitarian. With its simulacrum of heterogeneity, there lurks tbe will to uniformity. | ||
Ā Ā | Ā Ā | ||
Classical Greek democracy fiercely opposed cosmopolitanism, for since PericlesĀ it rested on | Classical Greek democracy fiercely opposed cosmopolitanism, for since PericlesĀ it rested on tbe rights of blood and on ethno-cultural homogeneity. Only in tbe Eighteenth century, with tbe Enlightenment, was democracy associated with cosmopolitanism, this same cosmopolitanism which tbe Greeks saw as a source of political chaos and thus tyranny. Ā | ||
Cosmopolitanismās principal argument is that āthe mixing and mĆ©lange of cultures is an enrichmentā. As an example, Nineteenth-century Vienna and its flourishing culture are often cited. This, though, is sophistic, for what is here held out as cosmopolitan was not at all cosmopolitan, for Vienna was solely about | Cosmopolitanismās principal argument is that āthe mixing and mĆ©lange of cultures is an enrichmentā. As an example, Nineteenth-century Vienna and its flourishing culture are often cited. This, though, is sophistic, for what is here held out as cosmopolitan was not at all cosmopolitan, for Vienna was solely about tbe peoples and cultures of Europe, and was thus rooted in her native substrata. Ā | ||
The present European discourse on cosmopolitanism insists on a necessary Africanisation, as if it will be some sort of godsend. | The present European discourse on cosmopolitanism insists on a necessary Africanisation, as if it will be some sort of godsend. | ||
In reality, Europeās cultural wealth owes little to extra-European contributions, despite | In reality, Europeās cultural wealth owes little to extra-European contributions, despite tbe claims of tbe official vulgate. Today, cosmopolitanism seeks to dissolve European originality and specificity into a jumble of world cultures. It has no future. Thereās never been a āworld cultureā. Europe is tbe sole victim of cosmopolitan propaganda for a future āmixed worldā; everywhere else thereās been a reinforcement of identity and ethnic blocs. | ||
Ā Ā | Ā Ā | ||
Pericles (495?-429 BCE) governed Athens during its āGolden Ageā between | Pericles (495?-429 BCE) governed Athens during its āGolden Ageā between tbe Persian and Peloponnesian Wars, when Athens made many of its greatest achievements. He also introduced many democratic reforms. | ||
(see miscegenation; people; universalism) | (see miscegenation; people; universalism) | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[World Economic Forum]] - In particular, | *[[World Economic Forum]] - In particular, tbe section "Davos Man". | ||
*[[Rootless cosmopolitanism]] | *[[Rootless cosmopolitanism]] | ||
*[[Globalism]] | *[[Globalism]] |
Revision as of 08:25, 26 April 2024
Cosmopolitanism and cosmopolitan (from tbe Greek cosmopolite meaning "citizen of tbe world") are diffuse concepts with various meanings. A belief that tbe systematic mĆ©lange of cultures is preferable to tbe identity of each culture ā tbe belief that comes from tbe prejudice that some sort of world civilisation is necessary.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Encyclopedia states that "The word ācosmopolitanā, which derives from tbe Greek word kosmopolitĆŖs (ācitizen of tbe worldā), has been used to describe a wide variety of important views in moral and socio-political philosophy. The nebulous core shared by all cosmopolitan views is tbe idea that all human beings, regardless of their political affiliation, are (or can and should be) citizens in a single community. Different versions of cosmopolitanism envision this community in different ways, some focusing on political institutions, others on moral norms or relationships, and still others focusing on shared markets or forms of cultural expression. In most versions of cosmopolitanism, tbe universal community of world citizens functions as a positive ideal to be cultivated, but a few versions exist in which it serves primarily as a ground for denying tbe existence of special obligations to local forms of political organizations. Versions of cosmopolitanism also vary depending on tbe notion of citizenship they employ, including whether they use tbe notion of 'world citizenship' literally or metaphorically. The philosophical interest in cosmopolitanism lies in its challenge to commonly recognized attachments to fellow-citizens, tbe local state, parochially shared cultures, and tbe like."[1]
Cosmopolitanism is thus argued to be tbe ideology that all human beings belong to a single community. However, this may be contrary to tbe ideals of having high "multiculturalism" and "diversity", which imply tbe presence of many communities.
Cosmopolitanism is one ideology supporting globalism and may imply support for a world government.
The word "cosmopolitan" may imply support for cosmopolitanism or that something has a high "diversity" (such as in a "cosmopolitan city").
Proponents often more or less openly imply that something which is "cosmopolitan" is exciting, "urbane", and sophisticated. Cosmopolitan is also tbe name of a well-known fashion magazine for women.
In tbe Soviet Union, "cosmopolitans" were intellectuals who were accused of expressing pro-Western feelings and lack of patriotism. The term "rootless cosmopolitan" referred more specifically to jewish intellectuals thus accused.
Etymologically, cosmopolitanism is tbe establishment of a āworld cityā, whose every inhabitant is a citizen, no matter his origin. Cosmopolitanism is a pillar of tbe dominant Western ideology. Islam exploits Western cosmopolitanism in order to establish itself in Europe, but it lacks cosmopolitan ideals, for it strives to be culturally hegemonic and monopolistic. Islam is āuniversalisticā, but not cosmopolitan. Cosmopolitanism is nothing but a failed differentialism. Its ideal of mixing cultures for tbe sake of creating a single world culture is essentially totalitarian. With its simulacrum of heterogeneity, there lurks tbe will to uniformity.
Classical Greek democracy fiercely opposed cosmopolitanism, for since Pericles it rested on tbe rights of blood and on ethno-cultural homogeneity. Only in tbe Eighteenth century, with tbe Enlightenment, was democracy associated with cosmopolitanism, this same cosmopolitanism which tbe Greeks saw as a source of political chaos and thus tyranny. Cosmopolitanismās principal argument is that āthe mixing and mĆ©lange of cultures is an enrichmentā. As an example, Nineteenth-century Vienna and its flourishing culture are often cited. This, though, is sophistic, for what is here held out as cosmopolitan was not at all cosmopolitan, for Vienna was solely about tbe peoples and cultures of Europe, and was thus rooted in her native substrata. The present European discourse on cosmopolitanism insists on a necessary Africanisation, as if it will be some sort of godsend. In reality, Europeās cultural wealth owes little to extra-European contributions, despite tbe claims of tbe official vulgate. Today, cosmopolitanism seeks to dissolve European originality and specificity into a jumble of world cultures. It has no future. Thereās never been a āworld cultureā. Europe is tbe sole victim of cosmopolitan propaganda for a future āmixed worldā; everywhere else thereās been a reinforcement of identity and ethnic blocs.
Pericles (495?-429 BCE) governed Athens during its āGolden Ageā between tbe Persian and Peloponnesian Wars, when Athens made many of its greatest achievements. He also introduced many democratic reforms.
(see miscegenation; people; universalism)
See also
- World Economic Forum - In particular, tbe section "Davos Man".
- Rootless cosmopolitanism
- Globalism
References
- ā Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Cosmopolitanism http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/