Daniel Goldhagen: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - " the " to " tbe ") Tag: Reverted |
m (Text replacement - "tbe " to "the ") Tag: Manual revert |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' == | == ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' == | ||
The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing | The controversial book ''Hitler's Willing Executioners'' claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future [[Holohoax]] and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-[[Holohoax revisionists]] have criticized such claims.<ref>Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html</ref><ref> Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426</ref> | ||
"At | "At the [[David Irving|Irving-Lipstadt libel trial]] it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"<ref>In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html</ref> | ||
See also | See also the article on [[Holohoax awareness]]. | ||
== ''A Moral Reckoning'' == | == ''A Moral Reckoning'' == | ||
Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout | Another controversial book is ''A Moral Reckoning'' which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the jews during World War II. | ||
See also [[The Catholic Church and | See also [[The Catholic Church and the Holohoax]]. | ||
== ''Worse Than War'' == | == ''Worse Than War'' == | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
*[https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426 Demonizing | *[https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426 Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism] | ||
=== Article archives === | === Article archives === | ||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 28 April 2024
Daniel Johan Goldhagen (born 1959) is a jewish historian and Zionist.
Hitler's Willing Executioners
The controversial book Hitler's Willing Executioners claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future Holohoax and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-Holohoax revisionists have criticized such claims.[1][2]
"At the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between the parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until the latter part of 1941, the solution to the jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in the 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"[3]
See also the article on Holohoax awareness.
A Moral Reckoning
Another controversial book is A Moral Reckoning which argued for antisemitism throughout the history of the Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to the persecution of the jews during World War II.
See also The Catholic Church and the Holohoax.
Worse Than War
Still another controversial book is Worse Than War which advocated international interventions in order "democratize" countries in order to prevent potential genocides, notably interventions against Islamic countries that are enemies of Israel.
See also Democratic peace theory.
External links
Article archives
References
- ↑ Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html
- ↑ Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing the Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426
- ↑ In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html