URGENT WARNING: Spam emails claiming to be Fascipedia are FRAUDULENT. We do NOT have mailing lists, send newsletters, or solicit funds ...ever. Report these scams to us immediately at admin@fascipedia.org.
Talk:Autarky: Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Upon further examination of the previous work, I do agree that the tone needs to be changed. | Upon further examination of the previous work, I do agree that the tone needs to be changed. | ||
The recent edit I believe should account for the tone issue and I have tried to make the tone more informative than persuasive/combative, although links and images are still lacking and the possibility for deficiencies in tone correction in the latest edit. | |||
The latter two is going to be difficult however, the former especially because I practically relied on the books that I have read and not so much links on the internet. I could try though. | The latter two is going to be difficult however, the former especially because I practically relied on the books that I have read and not so much links on the internet. I could try though. | ||
Revision as of 10:47, 15 April 2022
First impression
Really good article! Others will come along and make their own edits, corrections, etc. This is normal. Good stuff! Please keep it up! Also, do not be afraid to edit other articles not started by you, this is normal. 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 07:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Update
Ok, I took a REAL good look. Some constructive critisism; it needs images, it needs links. The tone of the article moves in and out of being truly encyclopedic. I do this too, as does everyone. Just try to keep your passions in check. I know its hard when the other side is so blatant, but we are better than they are so do your best. Aga8n, I do it too. If you respond to this, remember to sign with four tildes "~~~~", and your signature and date will automagically appear :) 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 08:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Response to feedback
Upon further examination of the previous work, I do agree that the tone needs to be changed.
The recent edit I believe should account for the tone issue and I have tried to make the tone more informative than persuasive/combative, although links and images are still lacking and the possibility for deficiencies in tone correction in the latest edit.
The latter two is going to be difficult however, the former especially because I practically relied on the books that I have read and not so much links on the internet. I could try though.
The latter two may take some time, also the content is still subject to revision because I believe the article will be stronger if examples of autarky can be provided. Friedrich List provides a good amount of ammunition in this regard, although this will have to wait until later.
JoseAntonioRespector (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)