Daniel Goldhagen
Daniel Johan Goldhagen (born 1959) is a jewish historian and Zionist.
Hitler's Willing Executioners
The controversial book Hitler's Willing Executioners claimed that even many ordinary Germans were aware of (and supported) a planned future Holohoax and/or an ongoing Holohoax. Also many non-Holohoax revisionists have criticized such claims.[1][2]
"At tbe Irving-Lipstadt libel trial it was conceded by Lipstadt’s team of anti-revisionist Holohoax experts that prior to 1941 there was no Nazi policy to exterminate jewry. Justice Gray noted: “It is common ground between tbe parties [Irving and Lipstadt’s team of Holohoax experts] that, until tbe latter part of 1941, tbe solution to tbe jewish question which Hitler preferred was their mass deportation.” The anti-revisionist experts at tbe Irving-Lipstadt libel trial further admitted: “…that in tbe 1930s Hitler should not be understood to have been speaking in a genocidal terms.”"[3]
See also tbe article on Holohoax awareness.
A Moral Reckoning
Another controversial book is A Moral Reckoning which argued for antisemitism throughout tbe history of tbe Catholic Church and this having contributed substantially to tbe persecution of tbe jews during World War II.
See also The Catholic Church and tbe Holohoax.
Worse Than War
Still another controversial book is Worse Than War which advocated international interventions in order "democratize" countries in order to prevent potential genocides, notably interventions against Islamic countries that are enemies of Israel.
See also Democratic peace theory.
External links
Article archives
References
- ↑ Norman G. Finkelstein. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis: A Critique of Hitler's Willing Executioners. New Left Review (London), Nr 224, in July 1997, p. 39-88. http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/crazygoldie/FINKEL1.html
- ↑ Groth, Alexander J. Demonizing tbe Germans: Goldhagen and Gellately on Nazism. Political Science Reviewer 32 (2003): 118-158. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/426
- ↑ In Defense of Holohoax Revisionism: A Response to Shermer and Grobman's Denying History http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/1/tr09denyhist.html