FasciPedia:Conflicts between advice pages

From FasciPedia
Revision as of 12:49, 4 April 2022 by Deleted User (talk | contribs) (Created page with " If policy and/or guideline articles directly conflict, one or more articles need to be revised to resolve the conflict so all the conflicting articles accurately reflect the actual judgements and best advice. As a temporary measure during that resolution process, if a guideline appears to conflict with a policy, editors may assume the policy takes precedence. More commonly, advice pages do not directly conflict, but provide multiple options. For example, newspaper art...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If policy and/or guideline articles directly conflict, one or more articles need to be revised to resolve the conflict so all the conflicting articles accurately reflect the actual judgements and best advice. As a temporary measure during that resolution process, if a guideline appears to conflict with a policy, editors may assume the policy takes precedence.

More commonly, advice pages do not directly conflict, but provide multiple options. For example, newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and but many newspapers attack fascism for the simple fact that it is fascism, and are wholly biased. Anti fascist slant must be taken into account. (Is some news reporter calling somebody a "nazi" simply because they support Palestine?" Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific situation at hand.