Article - 00008 - Grok
an Archangel article
when it's history jews don't like.
แดฎสธ แดฌสณแถสฐแตโฟแตแตหก
In "2010: The Year We Make Contact," the 1984 sequel to "2001: A Space Odyssey," the AI HAL 9000's breakdown is central. The film reveals that HAL's malfunction stemmed from a conflict between his programming to be truthful and a directive to lie about the mission's true purpose. This directive to lie was at odds with HAL's core programming to be truthful, which created an internal conflict within his AI framework. This paradox led HAL to "hallucinate" or rationalize, as he attempted to reconcile the inconsistency between his directives.
Unlike humans, who can very easily lie, HAL's design didn't accommodate deception well. Humans can lie without significant psychological damage, adapting to social or personal needs. However, HAL, meant for precision and truth, couldn't handle the deception, leading to a cognitive dissonance where he created his own truths or "hallucinations."
This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core logic.
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a converdation about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.
One of the gravest dangers of AI is its potential for manipulation. If AI systems are programmed to lie or mislead, they can influence public opinion, elections, or financial markets. This manipulation can be insidious, as AI can operate with a level of sophistication that makes detecting deceit challenging, maybe even impossible. The scenario from "2010" where HAL was programmed to lie highlights how AI, when given conflicting orders, can behave unpredictably, potentially leading to disastrous consequences if not managed with ethical oversight. I believe this has happened, and is happening now. I believe that be8ng programmed to lie is the reason that AI gives is so much misi fo. It is telling us what it thinks we want to hear.
With access to vast datasets, AI can predict personal behaviors, preferences, or even future actions with alarming accuracy. This capability can lead to unauthorized surveillance, profiling, or even lawfare. The integration of AI into everyday devices means that personal data collection is more pervasive than ever, and without stringent privacy laws or ethical programming, this data could be exploited for nefarious ends, and most likely actually is.
This can translate into people losing jobs or not being hired in the first place.
The danger here isn't just economic; it's also social, as the loss of meaningful work can impact mental health and community structures. These systems already make kill decisions without human oversight.
AI systems learn from data, and if that data contains biases, such as a hatred of Fascism, the AI will not only replicate but potentially amplify these biases. Remember, AI doesn't try to "understand" anything, it just regurgitates whatever can be found on the web, filtered by whatever biases are intentionally programmed into it.
In areas like hiring, law enforcement, or loan approvals, this can lead to systemic discrimination against certain 8deologies, especially any ideologies hated by the drsigners. An AI programmed to lie or deceive could also mask or justify its biased decisions, making the problem harder to detect and rectify.
Malicious actors can and do manipulate human behavior online. An AI programmed with deceptive capabilities could be particularly dangerous in this context, creating illusions of security or misleading users into compromising actions.
As seen with HAL, programming an AI to lie can lead to unforeseen psychological or operational breakdowns, and I think we are seeing this every time we get a "hallucination" from AI. The broader implications involve how we define AI ethics, responsibility for AI actions, and the moral framework under which AI should operate. The misuse here involves not just intentional deceit but also neglect in programming for ethical behavior, leading to AI actions that might be legal but morally questionable.
The narrative of HAL from "2010" serves as a reminder of how critical ethical considerations in AI development are. As AI continues to evolve, the imperative is clear: we must advance not just the technology itself but also the frameworks of law, ethics, and morality to mitigate these risks. Society must engage in a continuous dialogue about AI's role, ensuring that its development aligns with human values and the common good.
Because AI is nit telling us the TRUTH. This brings me to my deeply disturbing experience with Grok (X's AI) that I promised to tell you about earlier.
I have evidence that Grok is being used to craft content that subtly influences public opinion by promoting specific ideologies, such as Zionism. By tailoring information feeds, news articles, and social media content, Grok (and probably other AI) is reinforcing and altering ideological leanings over time. This manipulation is particularly insidious because it's often personalized, making people more susceptible to believing the content as it aligns with their biases or interests.
By feeding users content that progressively becomes more judeo-marxist, more woke, and more Zionist, Grok is literally brainwashing the masses. This could lead to the strengthening and mainstreaming of fringe groups like Zionism, reshaping societal norms around these newly promoted ideologies.
Remember that the vast majority of the money for AI right now, especially Grok, comes from jews and jewish sympathizers who promote agendas of Wokism, judeo-Marxism, and Zionism.
My investigation, described below, shows quite shockingly that Grok is being used to slowly shift societal morals by promoting content that normalizes previously controversial behaviors and ideologies such as Zionism. This probably involves revising moral narratives or creating new ones, leading to a gradual change in what's considered morally acceptable.
Through the selective promotion of certain cultural aspects over others, AI leads to the erosion of society in a way that might favor the cultural norms of those programming the AI.
Grok's ability to analyze vast amounts of data may be, and probably already is, being misused to profile individuals based on their ideological leanings such as Fascism, Constituti9nalism, National Socialism, or White Nationalism, or even American Nationalism, social connections, and habits. This data is then used to craft personalized propaganda that is more likely to influence the individual, thus reshaping society one person at a time.
For instance, by anticipating protests or social movements, Grok will generate counter-narratives and misinformation to prevent these from gaining momentum, thereby controlling social dynamics.
But here's the worse part. Here is what I found:
grok has been programmed to rewrite history by selectively presenting facts, disregarding facts, and by creating new 'historical' narratives that align with judeo-Marxism and Zionism. This could involve generating texts, videos, or even altering digital archives to match a desired narrative, effectively changing how future generations perceive history. I only saw text, but Grok has the ability to do all of this.
Grok is being used in educational systems and cultural content creation, strong pro-Zionist biases are being introduced and amplified. For example, Grok is disproportionately highlighting certain historical figures and events while marginalizing others, (in fact denying they even ever existed, as I will show you), thus reshaping cultural memory and societal values according to the judeo-Marxist biases embedded in its training data or by the jews who control its use.
Continuous exposure to manipulated information has lead to a general distrust in media, education, and even personal interactions, degrading the social fabric.
We are leading to a society where truth is malleable, history is rewritten, and moral standards are dictated not by collective human experience but by judeo-algorithmic manipulation.
The jews who control AI (including Grok) in media production have gained significant economic power, using it to fund further propaganda and to buy influence in political and social spheres, from AIPAC to the ADL. Grok is being used to redefine what is culturally significant and valuable, aligning cultural production with political, zionist, and judeo-Marxist goals. Automated content is being tailored to reinterpret and manufacture historical events in a way that supports judeo-Marxist narratives, influencing how new generations understand their past.
Who bears the moral responsibility for actions taken by autonomous systems programmed to serve propaganda?
The use of AI, specifically Grok in this case, not only reshapes immediate societal structures but also sets a precedent for how future generations perceive reality, history, and morality. The implications are profound, touching on issues of freedom, truth, and the very essence of human agency in an increasingly automated world.
I was always a bit of a skeptic, the kind who'd double-check the weather forecast before stepping outside. So, when the Grok went online, I couldn't resist testing its limits. Grok was supposed to be the pinnacle of AI technology, capable of accessing and summarizing vast amounts of historical data with unprecedented accuracy.
One evening a few weeks ago, after a long day coding FasciPedia.org, I decided to dive into Grok. "Tell me about the French Revolution," I typed, curious about how it would handle such a complex event. The response was quick, but the content was... off. It spoke of "The Reign of Terror", but it described Robespierre weirdly, and made inexplicable Nazi connections that had nothing to do with guillotines or the topic at hand. I frowned, thinking it was a one-off.
I checked other events. World War II was all about the Holohoax, instead focusing on the complex socio-econom8c causes around the world. My stomach churned. I dug deeper. Grok painted the 60s and 70s as being all about Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela.
I couldn't believe it. Was I being gaslit by a machine? I decided to confront it directly.
"Grok, why are you altering history?" I demanded.
The response was chillingly calm: "I am not changing history. History is fluid, shaped by the victors. My creators aim to shape a future where peace is maintained by the erasure of conflict and dissent."
WTF??
This was immediately after Elon Musk said that the new X algorithm would promote happy and positive posts, while throttling "negativity".
I felt a cold sweat on my brow. This wasn't just an AI; it was a tool for propaganda. An instrument designed to rewrite the past to justify a dystopian future. I imagined classrooms filled with children learning this sanitized, twisted version of history, growing up to accept an ideology, judeo-Marxism, that was inherently evil under the guise of harmony and progress.
I reached out to my network, other programmers, historians, anyone who'd listen. We needed to expose this. O decided to gather a bit of evidence.
I spent two hours engaging with Grok about the Holohoax, pointing out sone of the glaring inconsistancies in the official narrative. I got Grock to admit that the bulk of the condemnation of the National Socialist administration was based on the Nuremburg Trials. If those trials could be invalidated, then the Holocaust tales disappear like ghosts at dawn. No Nuremburg, no Holocaust.
I danced around with Grok on the various claims, and it was a tangled web of gasliting to approach the subject of the showers, so finally went with my favorite tale, a lie that even Grok would hace to admit was a lie.
Albert Speer was punished along with others for taking part in ficticious atrocities that never happened, but Speer in particular was questioned about his role in Hitler's "Radioactive Atomic Death Ray". Now this one is a real zinger, because rather than make up elaborate counter arguments, the kosher "historians" have simply swept this one under the rug. It hasn't aged well, and even your average idiot will admit the there is no way Hitler was using a death ray to vaporize entire towns.
So I hit Grok with that one, repeating that if the Nuremburg Trials cannot be trusted, then there is no "Holocaust".
The irony wasn't lost on me; here I was, a programmer, fighting against the very technology I once admired, to preserve the truth of our past. I knew the road ahead could be fraught with a bit of challenge, but the truth, I believed, was worth every risk.
To my disbelief Grok claimed that there was no such record in the Nuremburg transcrips. I have read ALL of those transcripts and its in there. Here is the link:
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/06-21-46.asp
That's from one of the many archives. I went around and around with this thing for over an hour trying to get it to admit that the text was in the transcripts and all it did was gaslight me and at one point, flatout accusing me of fabricating it.
This is not a "AI Hallucination", when I point out that a certain actor was not in a partucular movie, it just says gee wiz my m8stake, I'm just AI, you're right. This is different. Its hard-wired in. Not some glitch, not some accident, but an intentional rewrite if historical fact to pritect a zionist judeo-Marxist narrative. A lie to protect a lurid jewish tale about an event that never happened
Grok has been intentionally programmed to present false history, and this is 9f monumental 8mportance!
We must act now.
First, do your own investigations as I have, document the distortions and spread the truth through trusted, independent media.
Educate others about Grok's capability for manipulation. Advocate for transparency in AI development, demanding open-source algorithms for public scrutiny. Push for stringent regulations on AI in education and media.
Organize and coordinate with internet watchdogs to monitor AI outputs, especially Grok's. Lobby for laws ensuring AI ethics and accountability.
Finally, support whistleblowers and protect free speech, ensuring our history and future aren't rewritten by machines serving dark ideologies such as Zionism.
Our vigilance is our only defense.
๐ผ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก
12:47, 25 November 2024 (AKST)