FasciPedia:Enforcement

Enforcement

Peer Enforcement

Ninety percent of the time, if an writer or editor violates the standards described in our policies and guidelines, other writers and editors can persuade the person to adhere to acceptable norms of conduct, over time resorting to more forceful means, such as administrator intervention. This means individual editors and admins (including you) enforce and apply policies and guidelines.

Direct action

Admin actions. In the case of gross violations, we must resort to more forceful means fairly rapidly. This begins to get serious because we, as fascists, have to deal with all manner of backstabbing and subtrifuge from the Antifa types. Going against the principles set out on these pages, particularly policy pages, is totally unacceptable, and this writer cannot th8nk of a reason anyone would do thid. (Perhaps out of ignorance maybe?), if somebody wants to try something new, they should inqire and make sure its ok. Not simply go off half cocked. It may be possible to convince the admins an exception ought to be made. If so, do the convincing, then make adjust the rule.

An obvious attack

In cases where it is clear a user is acting against policy (or against a guideline in a way that conflicts with policy), and are doing so intentionally, that user should be indefinitely blocked from editing by an administrator. In cases of a dispute, and where the general dispute resolution procedure has been ineffective, a JUDGE (Highly trusted Admin with broad powers) has the power to deal with highly disruptive or sensitive situations.