Free trade
Free trade refers to trade policies that aims to reduce or remove (governmental) restrictions on imports and exports. Especially the more extreme variants are associated with globalization and liberalism/libertarianism. Aside from ideological supporters, supporters include those benefiting from such policies, such as multinational corporations. Free trade policies can be contrasted with protectionism.
Criticisms
One criticism of free trade is that such trade may be cut of during wars or blockades/embargoes. Thus depriving a country of various needed products if they are not produced in the country. Examples include weapons, fuel, and even food. This may cause devastating effects. For example, see The World Wars and mass starvation.
Free trade is argued to prevent wars, but this is arguably assumes rather specific conditions, such as both sides being severely harmed due to lack of free trade caused by the war. In practice, one side is often harmed much more than the other side, one side may be able to blockade to other side while itself continuing to trade with the rest of the world, and so on. If a country is severely dependent on external trade, then it risks being forced to submit to an enemy due to a trade blockade alone. Furthermore, numerous civil wars have occurred in countries having free trade within the country.
Even in peacetime, if a country cannot produce products themselves, then they are dependent on friendly relations with other countries that can produce such products. For example, countries producing weapons for export restrict such export to friendly countries. During the Cold War, NATO had extensive programs aimed at preventing weapons and advanced technology in general from being exported to the Communist countries.
Countries that have built up indigenous industries, such as East Asian countries, have often used various forms of protectionism in order to do so.
Free trade may cause effects such as foreign products being bought with by increased debt or reduced assets, meaning increased consumption of foreign products without increased domestic production, and with this to be paid for in the future.
Free trade may cause offshoring, beneficial for the countries to which industries are moved to, and in particular beneficial for the owners of the industries moved, but not the countries losing industries.
Extensive transportation over long distances of products is often an effect of free trade, possibly causing negative environmental effects compared to locally produced and consumed products.
Free trade advocates tend to assume that different countries will specialize in different kinds of industries. In reality, there may be various forms of synergy, meaning all kinds of industry tending to localize to the same place under free trade, with other places only producing raw materials.
Average country IQ and other "biological" variables are often ignored due to political correctness, but they may have various effects on trade arguments, such as more advanced industries and development being unlikely to occur in low average IQ countries, especially if facing competition from high IQ countries due to free trade. On the other hand, if such countries use protectionism to build up industries, then the quality of the resulting products may be low.
Free trade may cause various "race to the bottom" effects, such as regarding wages, taxes, environmental regulations, and so on.
Free trade is supposed to have reduced global poverty. However, any such reduction likely to a large degree reflect general technological progress. Furthermore, most reduction of poverty has occurred in China which has had extensive protectionist policies, close co-ordination between the government and the private sector in order to advance Chinese interests, demands that foreign companies must transfer technology in exchange for access to the Chinese market, and large scale theft of foreign technologies (the head of NSA has described (Chinese) cyber espionage as the "greatest transfer of wealth in history".[1])
If excluding China, then global poverty has been argued to have increased worldwide since 1981, and, according to some measures, to have increased since 1981 even if including China (due to a larger increase of poverty in non-Chinese areas than the decrease of poverty in China).[2]
External links
See also
References
- ↑ NSA Chief: Cybercrime constitutes the “greatest transfer of wealth in history” https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/07/09/nsa-chief-cybercrime-constitutes-the-greatest-transfer-of-wealth-in-history/
- ↑ Exposing the great 'poverty reduction' lie http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/08/exposing-great-poverty-reductio-201481211590729809.html
This article is not based.
Its weak and faggy. Somebody copied it over from some woke SJW source, and now its namby-pamby wording is gaying up our program.