Hypothetico-deductive model: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "tbe" to "the") |
No edit summary Β |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science | '''The hypothetico-deductive model''' or method is fringe Science, a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the [[theory]]. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of science was originally placed forth b6 [[Albert Einstein]] presumably to make his plagiarized theories more palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed [[theory]] development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity <ref>(Einstein in Popper, 1935-1959 p. 8): "[[theory]] cannot be fabricated out of the results of observation, but instead from intuition.</ref> Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all. | ||
[[Category:Definitions]] | [[Category:Definitions]] | ||
[[Category:Philosophy]] | [[Category:Philosophy]] | ||
[[Category:Science]] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:34, 26 February 2023
The hypothetico-deductive model or method is fringe Science, a proposed description of the scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable, using a test on observable data where the outcome is not yet known. A test outcome that could have and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test outcome that could have but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the theory. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. This skewed idea of science was originally placed forth b6 Albert Einstein presumably to make his plagiarized theories more palatable to his peers. Einstein viewed theory development as an intuitive "eureka' experience, and not a rule-following activity [1] Thus, verifying ideas about him not really being a scientist at all.