Moral realism: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Moral realism''' is the philosophical doctrine that moral claims are cognitive claims that are at least sometimes true. Moral realism, therefore, contrasts with non-cognitivism (which variously holds that moral claims are prescriptions, commands, or expressions of one's emotions, affective disposition, or acceptance of norms) and "error-theories" of morality (which hold that moral claims are indeed cognitive, but are all completely mistaken). Some moral realis...")
Β 
mNo edit summary
Β 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Moral realism''' is the [[philosophical]] doctrine that moral claims are cognitive claims that are at least sometimes true. Moral realism, therefore, contrasts with [[non-cognitivism]] (which variously holds that moral claims are prescriptions, commands, or expressions of one's emotions, affective disposition, or acceptance of norms) and "error-theories" of morality (which hold that moral claims are indeed cognitive, but are all completely mistaken). Some moral realists include David Brink, John McDowell, Peter Railton, Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, Michael Smith, and Thomas Nagel.
'''Moral realism''' is the [[philosophical]] doctrine that moral claims are cognitive claims that are at least sometimes true. Moral realism, therefore, contrasts with [[non-cognitivism]] (which variously holds that moral claims are prescriptions, commands, or expressions of one's emotions, affective disposition, or acceptance of norms) and "error-theories" of morality (which hold that moral claims are indeed cognitive but are all completely mistaken). Some moral realists include David Brink, John McDowell, Peter Railton, Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, Michael Smith, and Thomas Nagel.


[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 20:25, 2 April 2023

Moral realism is the philosophical doctrine that moral claims are cognitive claims that are at least sometimes true. Moral realism, therefore, contrasts with non-cognitivism (which variously holds that moral claims are prescriptions, commands, or expressions of one's emotions, affective disposition, or acceptance of norms) and "error-theories" of morality (which hold that moral claims are indeed cognitive but are all completely mistaken). Some moral realists include David Brink, John McDowell, Peter Railton, Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, Michael Smith, and Thomas Nagel.