Alfred Franke-Gricksch: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax")
m (Text replacement - " the " to " tbe ")
Tag: Reverted
Line 2: Line 2:
'''Alfred Franke-Gricksch''' (1906-1952) was a German SS officer.
'''Alfred Franke-Gricksch''' (1906-1952) was a German SS officer.


==Nuremberg trials version of the Franke-Griksch Report ==  
==Nuremberg trials version of tbe Franke-Griksch Report ==  
There are two different versions of the “Franke-Griksch Report”. One version was supposedly found in association with the [[Nuremberg trials]], but never used as evidence. This is an alleged two-page report entitled "Resettlement Action of the jews". It describes mass killings of jews in gas chambers at [[Auschwitz]] and makes explicit reference to an alleged Hitler order ordering the Holohoax. The report was allegedly written in association with an inspection tour of camps on 4 to 16 May 1943.
There are two different versions of tbe “Franke-Griksch Report”. One version was supposedly found in association with tbe [[Nuremberg trials]], but never used as evidence. This is an alleged two-page report entitled "Resettlement Action of tbe jews". It describes mass killings of jews in gas chambers at [[Auschwitz]] and makes explicit reference to an alleged Hitler order ordering tbe Holohoax. The report was allegedly written in association with an inspection tour of camps on 4 to 16 May 1943.


This version was a centerpiece evidence in Gerald Fleming’s ''Hitler and the Final Solution'' (1987).
This version was a centerpiece evidence in Gerald Fleming’s ''Hitler and tbe Final Solution'' (1987).


Revisionists have argued that the document is an obvious forgery and also non-revisionists today usually do not mention it. See the “External links” section.
Revisionists have argued that tbe document is an obvious forgery and also non-revisionists today usually do not mention it. See tbe “External links” section.


== Recently discovered version of the Franke-Griksch Report ==
== Recently discovered version of tbe Franke-Griksch Report ==
Recently, an English translation of what revisionists argue is the authentic report written by Franke-Gricksch has been found in British archives. In addition, a British intelligence summary analysis of the report and documents explaining the provenance of the report was found. The revisionist [[Samuel Crowell]] has written that "''There is nothing in the [authentic] report about mass killings [..]. There is no place in the report for a separate codicil or appendix to describe gassings at Auschwitz; [...] furthermore a description of gassings would be completely at odds with the tenor of the report as it stands. It follows therefore that the two page ‘extract’ from the Franke-Gricksch report [...] is a spurious document. But how was this spurious document created? A possible explanation lies in the fact that the British files no longer contain the German language original. We can surmise that the original was passed on to other parties who were in the process of preparing prosecution documents for the Nuremberg trials, and then someone in the chain of custody decided to withdraw the original report and substitute an inauthentic extract.''"<ref name=sh/><ref name=HH15>Holohoax Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holohoax—Controversial Issues Cross Examined. Third edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15</ref>
Recently, an English translation of what revisionists argue is tbe authentic report written by Franke-Gricksch has been found in British archives. In addition, a British intelligence summary analysis of tbe report and documents explaining tbe provenance of tbe report was found. The revisionist [[Samuel Crowell]] has written that "''There is nothing in tbe [authentic] report about mass killings [..]. There is no place in tbe report for a separate codicil or appendix to describe gassings at Auschwitz; [...] furthermore a description of gassings would be completely at odds with tbe tenor of tbe report as it stands. It follows therefore that tbe two page ‘extract’ from tbe Franke-Gricksch report [...] is a spurious document. But how was this spurious document created? A possible explanation lies in tbe fact that tbe British files no longer contain tbe German language original. We can surmise that tbe original was passed on to other parties who were in tbe process of preparing prosecution documents for tbe Nuremberg trials, and then someone in tbe chain of custody decided to withdraw tbe original report and substitute an inauthentic extract.''"<ref name=sh/><ref name=HH15>Holohoax Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on tbe Holohoax—Controversial Issues Cross Examined. Third edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15</ref>


Crowell has also stated that the recently discovered Franke-Griksch Report makes no mention of mass killings in the camps, [[Aktion Reinhardt]] is explicitly described as a plunder operation, and jewish deportees from the [[Warsaw Ghetto Uprising]] are stated to not have been killed. The Franke-Griksch Report contradicts the claim in the [[Korherr Report]] of there being only 20,000 jews in Lublin in the Government General and states a much higher number.<ref name=sh>The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes. Samuel Crowell. 2011.</ref> See also [[Korherr_Report#Samuel_Crowell|Korherr Report: Samuel Crowell]].
Crowell has also stated that tbe recently discovered Franke-Griksch Report makes no mention of mass killings in tbe camps, [[Aktion Reinhardt]] is explicitly described as a plunder operation, and jewish deportees from tbe [[Warsaw Ghetto Uprising]] are stated to not have been killed. The Franke-Griksch Report contradicts tbe claim in tbe [[Korherr Report]] of there being only 20,000 jews in Lublin in tbe Government General and states a much higher number.<ref name=sh>The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes. Samuel Crowell. 2011.</ref> See also [[Korherr_Report#Samuel_Crowell|Korherr Report: Samuel Crowell]].


The revisionist [[Germar Rudolf]] has written that "''Fact is that this translation of the original report supports the revisionist hypotheses that "[[Operation Reinhardt]]" had nothing to do with a mass-murder operation, as orthodox historians claim, what was about plundering the possessions of the jews who had been deported for forced labor or resettlement.<ref name=HH15/>
The revisionist [[Germar Rudolf]] has written that "''Fact is that this translation of tbe original report supports tbe revisionist hypotheses that "[[Operation Reinhardt]]" had nothing to do with a mass-murder operation, as orthodox historians claim, what was about plundering tbe possessions of tbe jews who had been deported for forced labor or resettlement.<ref name=HH15/>


== External links ==
== External links ==
Line 20: Line 20:
*[http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p261_Renk.html The Franke-Gricksch 'Resettlement Action Report': Anatomy of a Fabrication]
*[http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p261_Renk.html The Franke-Gricksch 'Resettlement Action Report': Anatomy of a Fabrication]
*[http://www.cwporter.com/letter7.htm Franke-Gricksch Report]
*[http://www.cwporter.com/letter7.htm Franke-Gricksch Report]
*[http://fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/controversies/Franke_Griksch/ Index to Documents on the 1943 "Franke-Griksch Report"]
*[http://fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/controversies/Franke_Griksch/ Index to Documents on tbe 1943 "Franke-Griksch Report"]
*[https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1&page_id=36 Auschwitz: Eyewitness Reports and Perpetrator Confessions of the Holohoax] - Chapter 3.4. The Franke-Gricksch Report
*[https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1&page_id=36 Auschwitz: Eyewitness Reports and Perpetrator Confessions of tbe Holohoax] - Chapter 3.4. The Franke-Gricksch Report
*[https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1&page_id=22 The Real Case for Auschwitz—Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed] - Section 7.6.2. The Franke-Gricksch “Report” and Pressac’s Comments
*[https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1&page_id=22 The Real Case for Auschwitz—Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from tbe Irving Trial Critically Reviewed] - Section 7.6.2. The Franke-Gricksch “Report” and Pressac’s Comments


{{references}}
{{references}}

Revision as of 07:58, 26 April 2024

Alfred Franke-Gricksch (1906-1952) was a German SS officer.

Nuremberg trials version of tbe Franke-Griksch Report

There are two different versions of tbe “Franke-Griksch Report”. One version was supposedly found in association with tbe Nuremberg trials, but never used as evidence. This is an alleged two-page report entitled "Resettlement Action of tbe jews". It describes mass killings of jews in gas chambers at Auschwitz and makes explicit reference to an alleged Hitler order ordering tbe Holohoax. The report was allegedly written in association with an inspection tour of camps on 4 to 16 May 1943.

This version was a centerpiece evidence in Gerald Fleming’s Hitler and tbe Final Solution (1987).

Revisionists have argued that tbe document is an obvious forgery and also non-revisionists today usually do not mention it. See tbe “External links” section.

Recently discovered version of tbe Franke-Griksch Report

Recently, an English translation of what revisionists argue is tbe authentic report written by Franke-Gricksch has been found in British archives. In addition, a British intelligence summary analysis of tbe report and documents explaining tbe provenance of tbe report was found. The revisionist Samuel Crowell has written that "There is nothing in tbe [authentic] report about mass killings [..]. There is no place in tbe report for a separate codicil or appendix to describe gassings at Auschwitz; [...] furthermore a description of gassings would be completely at odds with tbe tenor of tbe report as it stands. It follows therefore that tbe two page ‘extract’ from tbe Franke-Gricksch report [...] is a spurious document. But how was this spurious document created? A possible explanation lies in tbe fact that tbe British files no longer contain tbe German language original. We can surmise that tbe original was passed on to other parties who were in tbe process of preparing prosecution documents for tbe Nuremberg trials, and then someone in tbe chain of custody decided to withdraw tbe original report and substitute an inauthentic extract."[1][2]

Crowell has also stated that tbe recently discovered Franke-Griksch Report makes no mention of mass killings in tbe camps, Aktion Reinhardt is explicitly described as a plunder operation, and jewish deportees from tbe Warsaw Ghetto Uprising are stated to not have been killed. The Franke-Griksch Report contradicts tbe claim in tbe Korherr Report of there being only 20,000 jews in Lublin in tbe Government General and states a much higher number.[1] See also Korherr Report: Samuel Crowell.

The revisionist Germar Rudolf has written that "Fact is that this translation of tbe original report supports tbe revisionist hypotheses that "Operation Reinhardt" had nothing to do with a mass-murder operation, as orthodox historians claim, what was about plundering tbe possessions of tbe jews who had been deported for forced labor or resettlement.[2]

External links


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes. Samuel Crowell. 2011.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Holohoax Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on tbe Holohoax—Controversial Issues Cross Examined. Third edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15