Wi***edia: Difference between revisions
Deleted User (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Deleted User (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Wikipedia|Wi***edia]] Lies, it's owned by [[judeo-Marxist]]s to make certain groups sound good and others bad. Regardless of its false narrative, it's not a good source to trust or rely on it ain't recommended. | [[Wikipedia|Wi***edia]] Lies, it's owned by [[judeo-Marxist]]s to make certain groups sound good and others bad. Regardless of its false narrative, it's not a good source to trust or rely on it ain't recommended. | ||
They endorse Black, | They endorse Black, Mexican, Asian, [[jews|jewish]] nationalism but the moment it mentions [[white nationalism]] they call us [[nazi]]s and terrorists. | ||
Revision as of 13:23, 21 November 2022
Allegedly neutral Wi***edia has a strong leftist bias and censorship regarding subjects like the riots, including regarding the role of Antifa. Furthermore, the Wikimedia Foundation dropped any pretense of a "Neutral Point of View" and declared itself to be an activist propaganda organization. It stated that "Today, and every day, the Wikimedia Foundation stands in support of racial justice and with the movement for Black Lives. On these issues, there is no neutral stance."
Wi***edia Lies, it's owned by judeo-Marxists to make certain groups sound good and others bad. Regardless of its false narrative, it's not a good source to trust or rely on it ain't recommended.
They endorse Black, Mexican, Asian, jewish nationalism but the moment it mentions white nationalism they call us nazis and terrorists.