Malcolm Ross: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.*)Canadian(.*)\]\]" to "") |
m (Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax") ย |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Malcolm Ross''' (born May 1946) is a Canadian former schoolteacher who wrote [[ | '''Malcolm Ross''' (born May 1946) is a Canadian former schoolteacher who wrote [[Holohoax revisionist]] and claimed [[anti-Semitic]] writings, causing him to be removed from a teaching position and given a "gag order" stating that a non-teaching position would be terminated if he continued writing. ย | ||
In 1996, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the removal the classroom was justifiable, but not the "gag order". In 2000, Ross' appeal to the UN Human Rights Committee was rejected. ย | In 1996, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the removal the classroom was justifiable, but not the "gag order". In 2000, Ross' appeal to the UN Human Rights Committee was rejected. ย | ||
The case been argued to be even worse than that of the also Canadian teacher [[James Keegstra]], because Ross had never mentioned the | The case been argued to be even worse than that of the also Canadian teacher [[James Keegstra]], because Ross had never mentioned the Holohoax or jews in his classroom, but merely written books about these subjects.<ref>Reflections on the Second World War, Free Speech and Revisionismย https://codoh.com/library/document/2339/?lang=en</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Holohoax skeptics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:37, 25 February 2024
Malcolm Ross (born May 1946) is a Canadian former schoolteacher who wrote Holohoax revisionist and claimed anti-Semitic writings, causing him to be removed from a teaching position and given a "gag order" stating that a non-teaching position would be terminated if he continued writing.
In 1996, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the removal the classroom was justifiable, but not the "gag order". In 2000, Ross' appeal to the UN Human Rights Committee was rejected.
The case been argued to be even worse than that of the also Canadian teacher James Keegstra, because Ross had never mentioned the Holohoax or jews in his classroom, but merely written books about these subjects.[1]
See also
References
- โ Reflections on the Second World War, Free Speech and Revisionism https://codoh.com/library/document/2339/?lang=en
This article is not based.
Its weak and faggy. Somebody copied it over from some woke SJW source, and now its namby-pamby wording is gaying up our program.