User talk:Vanillamaster

Welcome to FasciPedia! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 18:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

NatSoc -- 𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

If you have a look, NatSoc:Main is probably the National Socialist portal you are looking for. 𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

My list -- 𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

This is a list of things that will help the noobs contribute to Fascipedia better, and not piss Archangel off and make him whine so much.

1. Try to divide your article into bite-sized chunks. Unless your article is a Definition, or a Stub, it should have at least one section.
2. Stubs and definitions do not need an image.
3. All articles should have at least one link. All links should either lead to another article already on fascipedia, or to an article that you intend to write. Red links suck ass, and should always be temporary.
4. Articles should have at least one link leading to them. Articles eithout a link leading to them are called orphans. Use the "what links here" menu item to check. A list of orphaned articles can be found 8n the "special pages" secti9n.
5. All articles should have at least one category. See [[Category:Core categories]]</nowik> for a list of acceptable categories. Do not invent categories. Archangel has a system, don't make extra work for him. Stick to the  categories he creates. If your category is in red, you have probably messed up. # Your articles should be professional and not employ slang or pointless insults. If you do, somebody will either correct it, or plant a <nowiki>{{preach}} tag on it.
6. All articles (except defs and stubs) should have at least one image. That image should be in png format. Jpgs look shitty, are obsolete,  and deteriorate over time.
7. Don't use the word "regime", or any other negative word with "fascism", or anything fascist.

𝓑𝓪𝓬𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓼 (talk)

Already impressed!!

One day, and you are already bolting out of the gate! I'm giving you some Silver Cake for your great work. You are the first ever to get Hitler Birthday Cake on day one, congratulations. Keep in mind FasciPedia:Fascist point of view, and that this isn't Wi***edia, and you'll do absolutely awesome. Hey, are you on GAB? 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 03:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Vanillamaster (talk) 04:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC) -- Vanillamaster (talk) 04:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC) -- Vanillamaster (talk) 04:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi sorry for taking a while to respond. I'm glad you appreciate the work I'm doing so far, thanks for the cool award. Yes, I know that this wiki is about topics written from our point of view as opposed by to the normie credentialist way that you find on Wikipedia, what I mean when I said that I want more articles to be formatted similarly is just to write in a more informative than argumentative method. like in my opinion if we make fascist arguments here it should be done in the same way that wikipedia makes shitlib arguments. The best wiki inactive that I know of that's analogous to this one that does what Im talking about is Metapedia so if you're confused about what I mean I'd suggest looking there for some examples. The main thing I wanna do here is help make this place more professional and read more like an actual wiki. like the Holohoax article is a good example of an article on here that does not read like a wiki article while the Bhagavad Gita and NatSoc:National Socialist German Workers Party are good examples of articlse that does what I'm talking about better

But yeah, I don't use gab because I don't like having much social media, the best way you can contact me or look at my feed is via my telegram: https://t.me/vanillamasterart

Thanks again, This is honestly a really fun way to contribute to the movement. My sperg brain works really well with wikis

Good deal! I actually Have not read tbe Holohoax article in detail, though I did write its first incarnation, I have not revisited it since then. Feel free to {{preach}} tag it. I really want professionalism to be at a high-point hete. But truth is whats most important. Metapedia won't print that James Fields was convicted of murdering a person that he didn't even hit with his car! That needs to be out there. They still basically parrot the mainstream, at least in that article. Metapedia is pretty professiinal though. I like that. If you read "rational wiki", you'll have an idea of what I consider too unprofessional. Fascipedia should be somewhere between rationalwiki and britannica. 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 21:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)