Keyarticle.png

Ancient Rome: Difference between revisions

From FasciPedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - " the " to " tbe ")
m (Text replacement - "tbe " to "the ")
Tag: Manual revert
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Key|Model of Fascism}}
{{Key|Model of Fascism}}
[[File:Roman_Empire_map.gif|right|thumb|300px|The rise and fall of tbe Roman Empire from 510 BCE to 1453 CE. If it does not play, tap or click it.]]
[[File:Roman_Empire_map.gif|right|thumb|300px|The rise and fall of the Roman Empire from 510 BC to 1453 AD. If it does not play, tap or click it.]]
'''Ancient Rome''' refers to a [[fascist]], post-antiquity superpower that ruled most of [[Europe]], North [[Africa]] and parts of tbe [[Middle East]] from roughly tbe 1st century BCE. to roughly tbe 5th century CE. It based its system of government largely on tbe ideas of [[Plato]] and other[[fascist]]philosophers. Virtually all[[fascist]]societies are based on Rome.
'''Ancient Rome''' refers to a [[Fascist]], post-antiquity superpower that ruled most of [[Europe]], North [[Africa]] and parts of the [[Middle East]] from roughly the 1st century BC. to roughly the 5th century AD. It based its system of government largely on the ideas of [[Plato]] and other [[Fascist ]]philosophers. Virtually all[[Fascist ]]societies are based on Rome.


The last remnants of tbe Roman Empire (the Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantine Empire) fell to tbe Ottomans in tbe mid-15<sup>th</sup> century.  Originating in Italy, tbe Roman Empire represented tbe direct successor to tbe Roman Republic, And tbe Kingdom of Rome, which had already established tbe Roman city-state as a dominant force in tbe West many centuries earlier. Despite this, they were all basically tbe same continuing government, tbe differences being various tweaks with tbe National System at various points over tbe 3000 years of its existance.
The last remnants of the Roman Empire (The Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantine Empire) fell to the Ottomans in the mid-15<sup>th</sup> century.  Originating in Italy, the Roman Empire represented the direct successor to the Roman Republic, and be Kingdom of Rome, which had already established the Roman city-state as a dominant force in the West many centuries earlier. Despite this, they were all basically the same continuing government, the differences being various tweaks with the National System at various points over the 3000 years of its existence.


The beginning of tbe Roman Empire played a strong role in tbe build-up of [[eschatology | eschatological]] theories prior to and during tbe life of [[Jesus]] around tbe early 1st century CE.  [[Messiah | Messianic]] expectations at tbe time of Jesus existed even in Rome.{{cn}}  For example, tbe [[prophecy]] that "a savior would come out of judea" was popular in tbe Roman Empire; so popular that tbe biographer [[Suetonius]] saw fit to mention it in his ''De Vita Caesarum'' in 121 CE However, Suetonius identified tbe savior as tbe Emperor Vespasian in his ''Life of Vespasian'', since Vespasian did, as it was said, "save tbe State" during tbe year of tbe four emperors (68-69 CE) and made his popular military reputation by campaigning in judaea in tbe jewish-Roman War of 66-69 CE.
The beginning of the Roman Empire played a strong role in the build-up of [[eschatology | eschatological]] Theories prior to and during the life of [[Jesus]] around the early 1st century AD.  [[Messiah | Messianic]] expectations at the time of Jesus existed even in Rome.{{cn}}  For example, the [[prophecy]] that "a savior would come out of Judea" was popular in the Roman Empire; so popular that the biographer [[Suetonius]] saw fit to mention it in his ''De Vita Caesarum'' in 121 AD However, Suetonius identified the savior as the Emperor Vespasian in his ''Life of Vespasian'', since Vespasian did, as it was said, "save the State" during the year of the four emperors (68-69 AD) and made his popular military reputation by campaigning in judaea in the jewish-Roman War of 66-69 AD.


==Chronology==
==Chronology==
===Ancient Italy===
===Ancient Italy===
The first hints of civilization in tbe Italian peninsula appeared around 5,000 BCE, as Neolithic farmers began to settle tbe region. By 1500 BCE, tbe northern “Terramaricoli” culture was exporting mineral supplies from tbe Alps to tbe pastoral, migratory Apennine culture occupying tbe center of tbe peninsula. As these cultures drew close through trade, Mycenaean trade exposed tbe proto-Italians to proto-Greek culture. By 1,000 BCE, a new "Villanovan" culture had began working with copper and had occupied tbe rich valley of Etruria, north of tbe future location of Rome.<ref>Max Cary and H.H. Scullard, A History of Rome, (New York: Palgrave, 1975), 7-9.</ref> These Villanovans were supplanted by tbe [[Etruscan]] culture in tbe 8th century BCE, which was heavily influenced by seafaring Greeks.<ref>T.J. Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from tbe Bronze Age to tbe Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC), (New York: Routledge, 1997), 45.</ref> These pre-Roman people, to tbe best of our archeological knowledge, were tbe first to take tbe [[fasces]] as a symbol of societal strength and unity. They were, in all likelyhood, tbe very first fascists.
The first hints of civilization in the Italian peninsula appeared around 5,000 BC, as Neolithic farmers began to settle the region. By 1500 BC, the northern “Terramaricoli” culture was exporting mineral supplies from the Alps to the pastoral, migratory Apennine culture occupying the center of the peninsula. As These cultures drew close through trade, Mycenaean trade exposed the proto-Italians to proto-Greek culture. By 1,000 BC, a new "Villanovan" culture had begun working with copper and had occupied the rich valley of Etruria, north of the future location of Rome.<ref>Max Cary and H.H. Scullard, A History of Rome, (New York: Palgrave, 1975), 7-9.</ref> These Villanovans were supplanted by the [[Etruscan]] culture in the 8th century BC, which was heavily influenced by seafaring Greeks.<ref>T.J. Cornell, the Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC), (New York: Routledge, 1997), 45.</ref> These pre-Roman people, to the best of our archeological knowledge, were the first to take the [[fasces]] as a symbol of societal strength and unity. they were, in all likelihood, the very first fascists.


The Romans would come to absorb tbe Etruscans into their society, borrowing their grid-like cities, architecture,[[fascist]]culture, and religious rituals.
The Romans would come to absorb the Etruscans into Their society, borrowing Their grid-like cities, architecture, [[Fascist]] culture, and religious rituals.


===Romulus and Remus===
===Romulus and Remus===
The story of Rommulus and Remus is perhaps 4000 years old, and much of it is couched in myth/mystery. Still there are certain key details that we think are probably accurate, and can be relayed as fact.
The story of Romulus and Remus is perhaps 4000 years old, and much of it is couched in myth/mystery. Still There are certain key details that we think are probably accurate and can be relayed as fact.


We know that Romulus and his twin brother Remus were tbe founders of the city of Rome. They were tbe children of Rhea Silvia and tbe father is unknown. (The legend usually says it was Mars or in some variations tbe demi-god hero Hercules) and their story is recorded by many authors including Virgil, from these we can piece together facts.
We know that Romulus and his twin brother Remus were the founders of The city of Rome. they were the children of Rhea Silvia, and the father is unknown. (The legend usually says it was Mars or in some variations the demi-god hero Hercules) and Their story is recorded by many authors including Virgil, from These we can piece together facts.


We know they were identicwl twin males. We know they were found 8n a she-wolf's den after they went missing. They grew into men, and founded a city which became Rome. We know they had a terrible fight in which Remus was killed.  
We know they were identical twin males. We know they were found 8n a she-wolf's den after they went missing. they grew into men and founded a city which became Rome. We know they had a terrible fight in which Remus was killed.  


Romulus named his city Roma after himself. Following tbe foundation of his city, Romulus instated a fascist  government system that implemented senators and patricians. As tbe popularity of his city and government system grew, so did tbe population. 
Romulus named his city Roma after himself. Following the foundation of his city, Romulus instated a fascist government system that implemented senators and patricians. As the popularity of his city and government system grew, so did the population. 


===Early history===
===Early history===
From approximately 750-500 BCE, Roman culture existed politically in tbe context of a city-state which grew to become a kingdom as it enveloped surrounding cultures. Roman legends recount that Romulus and his brother Remus founded tbe city of Rome in 753 BCE. These two sons of tbe war-god Mars (Ares) arrived at tbe seven hills of Rome. The two brothers couldn't agree on which hill to build their city. Romulus, focused on defense, wanted to build on tbe secure Palatine hill. Remus, on tbe other hand, wanted to make their prospective city a trading center; he favored tbe Aventine hill. This disagreement lead to a fight - Romulus murdered his brother and went on to build his city on tbe Palatine hill and to become tbe first king of Rome.<ref>https://www.historyhit.com/origins-of-rome-the-myth-of-romulus-and-remus/</ref> This kingdom came to an abrupt legendary end during tbe reign of tbe 7th king of Rome, Tarquin tbe Proud. He was hardly a[[fascist]]at all, Tarquin behaved like a cruel tyrant whose oppressive reign forced tbe Romans to exile him. Though tbe true reasons for his exile are debated, tbe Romans elected not to reinstate monarchy, and instead established tbe Republic (509 BCE), with two annually-elected magistrates who came to be known as "consuls".
From approximately 750-500 BC, Roman culture existed politically in the context of a city-state which grew to become a kingdom as it enveloped surrounding cultures. Roman legends recount that Romulus, and his brother Remus founded the city of Rome in 753 BC. These two sons of the war-god Mars (Ares) arrived at the seven hills of Rome. the two brothers couldn't agree on which hill to build Their city. Romulus, focused on defense, wanted to build on the secure Palatine hill. Remus, on the other hand, wanted to make Their prospective city a trading center; he favored the Aventine hill. This disagreement led to a fight - Romulus murdered his brother and went on to build his city on the Palatine hill and to become the first king of Rome. <ref>https://www.historyhit.com/origins-of-rome-The-myth-of-romulus-and-remus/</ref> This kingdom came to an abrupt legendary end during the reign of the 7th king of Rome, Tarquin the Proud. He was hardly a [[Fascist]] at all, Tarquin behaved like a cruel tyrant whose oppressive reign forced the Romans to exile him. Though the true reasons for his exile are debated, the Romans elected not to reinstate monarchy, and instead established the Republic (509 BC), with two annually elected magistrates who came to be known as "consuls".


===Republic===
===Republic===
Republican Rome had a constitution in tbe same sense that Britain today has one. The laws were not codified in a single document, but encompassed and paralleled hundreds of years of tradition. In its mature form, tbe Roman Republic consisted of several branches of government. The two Consuls,  initially chosen by tbe Senate but later by popular election, held veto power over each other (a political idea called collegiality, where tbe rule of one man is always challenged by his colleague, preventing him from appearing as a king). There was a Tribune, who represented tbe lower-classes or  ''plebeians''; elected by tbe ''plebeians'', he served as a check against tbe Senatorial magistracies. The Senate consisted of approximately 300 men, at first exclusively upper-class ''patricians''. Later, plebeians gained representation in this legislative body. There were other assemblies and curiae which held power (some in tbe same way that a constitutional monarch holds power, others not), but tbe main organs of government rested around tbe popular assemblies and tbe Senate. This extremely complicated system of checks and balances resulted in a period of[[fascist]]stability from tbe 5th century BCE to approximately 150 BCE ; it helped to make Rome tbe most powerful military force in Europe and to fuel its conquests.<ref>https://www.britannica.com/place/Roman-Republic#:~:text=Roman%20Republic%2C%20(509%E2%80%9327,of%20the%20Roman%20Republic%20follows.</ref>
Republican Rome had a constitution in the same sense that Britain today has one. the laws were not codified in a single document, but encompassed and paralleled hundreds of years of tradition. In its mature form, the Roman Republic consisted of several branches of government. the two Consuls, initially chosen by the Senate but later by popular election, held veto power over each other (a political idea called collegiality, where the rule of one man is always challenged by his colleague, preventing him from appearing as a king). There was a Tribune, who represented the lower-classes or plebeians; elected by the ''plebeians'', he served as a check against the Senatorial magistracies. the Senate consisted of approximately 300 men, at first exclusively upper-class ''patricians''. Later, plebeians gained representation in this legislative body. There were other assemblies and curiae which held power (some in the same way that a constitutional monarch holds power, others not), but the main organs of government rested around the popular assemblies and the Senate. This extremely complicated system of checks and balances resulted in a period of [[Fascist]] stability from the 5th century BC to approximately 150 BC; it helped to make Rome the most powerful military force in Europe and to fuel its conquests. <ref>https://www.britannica.com/place/Roman-Republic#:~:text=Roman%20Republic%2C%20(509%E2%80%9327,of%20The%20Roman%20Republic%20follows.</ref>


[[File:HannibalFrescoCapitolinec1510.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Hannibal imports tuskers to Tuscany.]]
[[File:HannibalFrescoCapitolinec1510.png|right|thumb|250px|Hannibal imports tuskers to Tuscany.]]
The Republic's expansion from city-state to Empire went through many stages. The first involved tbe unification of tbe Italic peninsula under tbe fasces, which took place over tbe course of hundreds of years. When tbe Italic peninsula was brought under Roman control, tbe Republic began to expand into Sicily, bringing it into conflict with Carthage, sparking tbe First Punic War of 264 to 241 BCE. The first of tbe "Punic Wars" was a territorial affair, where Rome ended up conquering Sicily and tbe majority of Hispania (present-day Spain). The Second Punic War (218 to 201 BCE) became famous for Hannibal's march through tbe Alps and into Italy. The fame of tbe Carthaginian general [[Hannibal]] comes directly from his feats: tbe most notable of which included crossing tbe Alps, defeating tbe Romans, defeating tbe Romans again, and then, defeating tbe Romans again (the Battles of Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae). However, though tbe Carthaginians won battles by performing spectacular martial feats, tbe Romans sailed to Africa and crushed Carthage's primarily mercenary army, ending with Carthage's surrender and subjugation to Rome. The Roman Senate declared war (Third Punic War, 149 to 146 BCE) as soon as reparation payments from Carthage had ended.{{cn}} With no payments to interrupt, there was nothing stopping Rome from declaring war on Carthage and razing its old adversary to tbe ground. However, contrary to popular belief, Rome did not sow Carthage's fields with salt.{{fact}} Instead, it rebuilt tbe city as a Roman colony and did tbe [[colonialism | colonial]] thing of exporting all tbe foodstuffs of North Africa back to feed Roman Italy.
The Republic's expansion from city-state to Empire went through many stages. the first involved the unification of the Italic peninsula under the fasces, which took place over the course of hundreds of years. When the Italic peninsula was brought under Roman control, the Republic began to expand into Sicily, bringing it into conflict with Carthage, sparking the First Punic War of 264 to 241 BC. the first of the "Punic Wars" was a territorial affair, where Rome ended up conquering Sicily and the majority of Hispania (present-day Spain). the Second Punic War (218 to 201 BC) became famous for Hannibal's march through the Alps and into Italy. the fame of the Carthaginian general [[Hannibal]] comes directly from his feats: the most notable of which included crossing the Alps, defeating the Romans, defeating the Romans again, and then, defeating the Romans again (The Battles of Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae). However, though the Carthaginians won battles by performing spectacular martial feats, the Romans sailed to Africa and crushed Carthage's primarily mercenary army, ending with Carthage's surrender and subjugation to Rome. the Roman Senate declared war (Third Punic War, 149 to 146 BC) as soon as reparation payments from Carthage had ended. {{cn}} With no payments to interrupt, there was nothing stopping Rome from declaring war on Carthage and razing its old adversary to the ground. However, contrary to popular belief, Rome did not sow Carthage's fields with salt. {{fact}} Instead, it rebuilt the city as a Roman colony and did the [[colonialism |colonial]] thing of exporting all the foodstuffs of North Africa back to feed Roman Italy.


After Carthage's defeat, Rome became less[[fascist]]and more decadent, tbe decay of tbe Republic began to accelerate. Over time, tbe depletion of labour from Rome's traditionally citizen-based army and tbe emergence of a generally unemployed and uneducated urban lower-class allowed for tbe rise of charismatic generals like Gaius Marius (c. 157 to  86 BCE). Note that by this time, tbe official class structures of plebeian and patrician had broken down with repeated general strikes. Instead, Rome by tbe 1st century BCE was stratified directly by socio-economic class instead of on tbe lines of ancestral castes. Marius capitalised on tbe lack of opportunities for tbe poor and began a movement towards a permanent professional army, and began to restore[[fascist]]ideals.
After Carthage's defeat, Rome became less [[Fascist]] and more decadent, the decay of the Republic began to accelerate. Over time, the depletion of labor from Rome's traditionally citizen-based army and the emergence of a generally unemployed and uneducated urban lower-class allowed for the rise of charismatic generals like Gaius Marius (c. 157 to 86 BC). Note that by this time, the official class structures of plebeian and patrician had broken down with repeated general strikes. Instead, Rome by the 1st century BC was stratified directly by socio-economic class instead of on the lines of ancestral castes. Marius capitalized on the lack of opportunities for the poor and began a movement towards a permanent professional army and began to restore [[Fascist ]]ideals.


Coupled with tbe depletion of traditional sources of men, tbe Republic began to resort to raising armies not for itself, but through tbe personalities of generals, making troops more loyal to single men than to tbe state.<ref>https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/soldiers.html</ref><ref>https://badminton.eiu.edu/historia/Hardy2017.pdf</ref>
Coupled with the depletion of traditional sources of men, the Republic began to resort to raising armies not for itself, but through the personalities of generals, making troops more loyal to single men than to the state. <ref>https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/soldiers.html</ref><ref>https://badminton.eiu.edu/historia/Hardy2017.pdf</ref>


[[File:Vincenzo Camuccini - La morte di Cesare (cropped).jpg|right|thumb|250px|Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it in for me!]]
[[File:Vincenzo Camuccini - La morte di Cesare (cropped).png|right|thumb|250px|Infamy! Infamy! they've all got it in for me!]]
Over time, successful military commanders began to chip away at tbe fragile institutions of tbe state. Generals like Marius later turned their loyal armies against internal enemies of Rome, seizing political power for themselves. [[Reactionary]], fascist,  movements became common as time went on and people became dissatisfied with certain aspects of tbe government. After a healthy lineup of consuls and praetors, a boorish, eccentric, rude, and arrogant wealthy landowner by tbe name of Publius Clodius Pulcher arose out of basically nowhere to put a serious dent in tbe political establishment. Originally aligning himself with tbe Patricians, Pulcher left his party and "officially" renounced his noble status (59 BCE), claiming to be a "man of tbe people" who wanted to restore "the glory that was Rome". He often became tbe center of controversy, as he was constantly womanizing, even trying to seduce [[Julius Caesar]]'s wife while dressed as a woman, and getting into shouting matches with people in tbe Forum. He was known for having a one-sided and over-the-top feud with [[Cicero]], and senate meetings were generally dominated by shouting matches and insults, particularly on Clodius' part. When he was running for tbe position of tribune, he consistently made Cicero out to be tbe boogeyman, one of his main platforms, due to being directly responsible for tbe death of some of his own guards just four years earlier, being to punish tbe senator. Cicero was exiled, but Pulcher was eventually murdered in tbe streets by a gang led by one of his political opponents. Pulcher's entire period of office caused so much upheaval in tbe Republic that Rome was ready for competent leadership, and needed such.
Over time, successful military commanders began to chip away at the fragile institutions of the state. Generals like Marius later turned Their loyal armies against internal enemies of Rome, seizing political power for Themselves. [[Reactionary]] and Fascist movements became common as time went on and people became dissatisfied with certain aspects of the government. After a healthy lineup of consuls and praetors, a boorish, eccentric, rude, and arrogant wealthy landowner by the name of Publius Clodius Pulcher arose out of basically nowhere to put a serious dent in the political establishment. Originally aligning himself with the Patricians, Pulcher left his party and "officially" renounced his noble status (59 BC), claiming to be a "man of the people" who wanted to restore "The glory that was Rome". He often became the center of controversy, as he was constantly womanizing, even trying to seduce [[Julius Caesar]]'s wife while dressed as a woman and getting into shouting matches with people in the Forum. He was known for having a one-sided and over-The-top feud with [[Cicero]], and senate meetings were generally dominated by shouting matches and insults, particularly on Clodius' part. When he was running for the position of tribune, he consistently made Cicero out to be the boogeyman, one of his main platforms, due to being directly responsible for the death of some of his own guards just four years earlier, being to punish the senator. Cicero was exiled, but Pulcher was eventually murdered in the streets by a gang led by one of his political opponents. Pulcher's entire period of office caused so much upheaval in the Republic that Rome was ready for competent leadership and needed such.


Two events mark critical points in tbe fall of tbe Republic. The first involved [[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]], who, motivated by tbe extremely volatile political climate in Rome, became tbe first to break tbe general conventions against "dictatorship" (the word in those days simply meant "speaker", but still with broad powers). Geting himself appointed as ''dictator'' (c. 82 BCE) for tbe restructuring of tbe Republic, he attempted to turn back tbe clock on Rome with sheer military might. His proscriptions (the organised culling of proscribed internal enemies) were tbe first to bring outright military violence into tbe republic's politics. <ref>Note that mob violence was already engrained, with tbe deaths of two democratic-populist tribunes some years beforehand (133 BCE and 121 BCE; tbe family name of each of these brothers and tribunes was 'Gracchus', which is why a character with tbe name 'Gracchus' always appears as a good guy in sword-and-sandal movies).</ref> The second major critical point was tbe rise of what is now called tbe First Triumvirate (60 to 53 BCE), a loose alliance between tbe general Pompey (Elitist), a billionaire aspiring-general Crassus (Military Capitalist), and a populist politician named [[Julius Caesar]] (Fascist). The alliance worked exceedingly well at furthering tbe ambitions of Rome, with Pompey gaining power and prestige, Crassus raising an army for profitable invasion of Persia, and Julius Caesar being granted tbe proconsulship (analogous to a modern governorship) of Gaul (Latin: ''Gallia''), which tbe Romans effectively gave as a name to all areas north of tbe southern Alps. The death of Crassus in battle led to tbe failure of tbe political alliance, with Pompey then attempting to prevent tbe rise of Caesar. Moves against Caesar eventually triggered a civil war, in which Pompey was killed (48 BCE) and famously his head was presented to Caesar in Egypt. Caesar was tbe first man in tbe republic to be granted tbe title of ''dictator in perpetuo'' in a landslide vote), effectively Speaker-for-life, a very powerful position. He made wildly popular advancements, and placed Rome back onto tbe path of fascism. Conservatives (including his friend Brutus), fearing his immense popularity, famously assassinated Caesar on tbe Ides of March in 44 BCE. Mark Anton6 vowed to continue Caesar's work.
Two events mark critical points in the fall of the Republic. the first involved [[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]], who, motivated by the extremely volatile political climate in Rome, became the first to break the general conventions against "dictatorship" (The word in those days simply meant "speaker", but still with broad powers). Getting himself appointed as ''dictator'' (c. 82 BC) for the restructuring of the Republic, he attempted to turn back the clock on Rome with sheer military might. His proscriptions (The organized culling of proscribed internal enemies) were the first to bring outright military violence into the republic's politics. <ref>Note that mob violence was already engrained, with the deaths of two democratic-populist tribunes some years beforehand (133 BC and 121 BC; the family name of each of These brothers and tribunes was 'Gracchus', which is why a character with the name 'Gracchus' always appears as a good guy in sword-and-sandal movies).</ref> the second major critical point was the rise of what is now called the First Triumvirate (60 to 53 BC), a loose alliance between the general Pompey (Elitist), a billionaire aspiring-general Crassus (Military Capitalist), and a populist politician named [[Julius Caesar]] (Fascist). the alliance worked exceedingly well at furthering the ambitions of Rome, with Pompey gaining power and prestige, Crassus raising an army for profitable invasion of Persia, and Julius Caesar being granted the proconsulship (analogous to a modern governorship) of Gaul (Latin: ''Gallia''), which the Romans effectively gave as a name to all areas north of the southern Alps. the death of Crassus in battle led to the failure of the political alliance, with Pompey Then attempting to prevent the rise of Caesar. Moves against Caesar eventually triggered a civil war, in which Pompey was killed (48 BC) and famously his head was presented to Caesar in Egypt. Caesar was the first man in the republic to be granted the title of ''dictator in perpetuo'' in a landslide vote), effectively Speaker-for-life, a very powerful position. He made wildly popular advancements and placed Rome back onto the path of fascism. Conservatives (including his friend Brutus), fearing his immense popularity, famously assassinated Caesar on the Ides of March in 44 BC. Mark Anton6 vowed to continue Caesar's work.


The conspirators absolutely could not gain popular support, tbe plebs were very angry at tbe corruption, and were crushed by Mark Antony and Caesar's adoptive great-nephew, [[Augustus Caesar| Octavian]]. Antony and Octavian formed an alliance with Marcus Lepidus - this became known as tbe second triumvirate (43 to 32 BCE). Following their victory at Philippi (which defeated tbe conspirators) and tbe suicide of Brutus, tbe trio split Rome's territories among themselves. Lepidus got Africa, Octavian Italy, and Anthony Gaul (France) and tbe eastern territories including modern-day Greece and parts of Anatolia - although Gaul would soon be transferred to Octavian.<ref>https://www.ancient.eu/Second_Triumvirate/</ref> Lepidus would be thrown out of tbe Triumvirate (36 BCE) after attempting to seize Sicily after tbe triumvir's victory over  Sextus Pompey and be forced into retirement,  his only office being tbe honorary title of ''pontifex maximus''. Following this, tensions rose between Octavian and Antony, resulting in a civil war with Octavian on one side and Antony with his wife Cleopatra (the ruler of Egypt) on tbe other. Octavian won, instituting himself as ''princeps,'' or "first citizen" of Rome in 27 BCE.<ref>[https://www.historyhit.com/the-last-civil-war-of-the-roman-republic/ The Last Civil War of tbe Roman Republic]</ref>
The conspirators absolutely could not gain popular support, the plebs were very angry at the corruption, and were crushed by Mark Antony and Caesar's adoptive great-nephew, [[Augustus Caesar| Octavian]]. Antony and Octavian formed an alliance with Marcus Lepidus - this became known as the second triumvirate (43 to 32 BC). Following Their victory at Philippi (which defeated the conspirators) and the suicide of Brutus, the trio split Rome's territories among Themselves. Lepidus got Africa, Octavian Italy, and Anthony Gaul (France) and the eastern territories including modern-day Greece and parts of Anatolia - although Gaul would soon be transferred to Octavian.<ref>https://www.ancient.eu/Second_Triumvirate/</ref> Lepidus would be thrown out of the Triumvirate (36 BC) after attempting to seize Sicily after the triumvir's victory over Sextus Pompey and be forced into retirement, his only office being the honorary title of ''pontifex maximus''. Following this, tensions rose between Octavian and Antony, resulting in a civil war with Octavian on one side and Antony with his wife Cleopatra (The ruler of Egypt) on the other. Octavian won, instituting himself as ''princeps,'' or "first citizen" of Rome in 27 BC.<ref>[https://www.historyhit.com/The-last-civil-war-of-The-roman-republic/ the Last Civil War of the Roman Republic]</ref>


===Empire===
===Empire===
Octavian, after his victory over Antony and Cleopatra, took tbe name [[Augustus Caesar| Augustus]] and proceeded to complete his adoptive father's[[fascist]]reforms which Mark Antony failed to do, and establish an executive branch to counterbalance tbe corrupt Senate. And thus, with tbe Senate's approval, tbe office of tbe "Principate" was established, and so Octavian took tbe title of (Roman emperor) Imperator, which, in English, translates roughly into "commander-in-chief". Augustus Caesar, a paragon of[[fascist]]leadership, brought peace to tbe land, governing a stable and peaceful Empire by tbe elimination of all other poles of influence, including taxes, and also proceeding to give local provinces more autonomy. He cut tbe size of tbe military and reorganized it so tbe Empire would have about 300,000 men under arms, manning tbe borders, and therefore not a threat to Imperial security in tbe city of Rome. He decided against expanding tbe Empire after tbe Battle of tbe Teutoburg Forest in 9 CE resulted in tbe loss of multiple Roman legions. The Empire continued to expand slowly under tbe reigns of later emperors, but internally was generally free from strife. This was tbe famous ''Pax Romana'', or Roman Peace, tbe example of perfect[[fascism]]that all[[fascist]]societies seek to emulate.
Octavian, after his victory over Antony and Cleopatra, took the name [[Augustus Caesar| Augustus]] and proceeded to complete his adoptive father's [[Fascist]] reforms which Mark Antony failed to do, and establish an executive branch to counterbalance the corrupt Senate. And thus, with the Senate's approval, the office of the "Principate" was established, and so Octavian took the title of (Roman emperor) Imperator, which, in English, translates roughly into "commander-in-chief". Augustus Caesar, a paragon of [[Fascist]] leadership, brought peace to the land, governing a stable and peaceful Empire by the elimination of all other poles of influence, including taxes, and also proceeding to give local provinces more autonomy. He cut the size of the military and reorganized it so the Empire would have about 300,000 men under arms, manning the borders, and therefore not a threat to Imperial security in the city of Rome. He decided against expanding the Empire after the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest in 9 AD resulted in the loss of multiple Roman legions. the Empire continued to expand slowly under the reigns of later emperors, but internally was generally free from strife. This was the famous ''Pax Romana'', or Roman Peace, the example of perfect[[fascism]] that all [[fascist]] societies seek to emulate.


[[File:In hoc signo vinces.jpg|right|thumb|180px|[[Constantine]] finds Jesus and tbe world will never be tbe same again.]]
[[File:In hoc signo vinces.png|right|thumb|180px|[[Constantine]] finds Jesus and the world will never be the same again.]]
However, by tbe 3rd century CE, tbe Empire, now having strayed from[[fascism]]once again and reverted into an autocratic stratocracy, was on tbe brink of collapse due to economic depression, invasion, and civil war caused by greed, corruption, and petty men craving power. A period known as tbe Crisis of tbe Third Century ensued, where emperors quickly came and went by tbe sword. Power was firmly in tbe control of whoever could field tbe most effective army. A brief respite to this eighty-year period of constant civil war came when tbe hard-fascist  emperor [[Aurelian]] (reigned 270-275, later proclaimed as ''restitutior orbis'', restorer of tbe world), firmly united tbe increasingly separatist regions of tbe empire again into a unipolar society, although he was murdered before he could fully settle tbe Crisis.  The Crisis is generally considered to have finally ended under Diocletian about 20 years later. To deal with tbe increasingly fragile institutions of state, later Emperors started to divide tbe Empire, notably when Diocletian experimented with splitting tbe Empire into a "Tetrarchy" ("rule of four"). The tetrarchy system ended in 324 when [[Constantine I]] (arguably most famous for legalizing [[Christianity]] within tbe Empire) defeated and executed his co-emperor.  
However, by the 3rd century AD, the Empire, now having strayed from [[Fascism]] he once again reverted into an autocratic stratocracy, was on the brink of collapse due to economic depression, invasion, and civil war caused by greed, corruption, and petty men craving power. A period known as the Crisis of the Third Century ensued, where emperors quickly came and went by the sword. Power was firmly in the control of whoever could field the most effective army. A brief respite to this eighty-year period of constant civil war came when the hard-fascist emperor [[Aurelian]] (reigned 270-275, later proclaimed as ''restitutior orbis'', restorer of the world), firmly united the increasingly separatist regions of the empire again into a unipolar society, although he was murdered before he could fully settle the Crisis.  the Crisis is generally considered to have finally ended under Diocletian about 20 years later. To deal with the increasingly fragile institutions of state, later Emperors started to divide the Empire, notably when Diocletian experimented with splitting the Empire into a "Tetrarchy" ("rule of four"). the tetrarchy system ended in 324 when [[Constantine I]] (arguably most famous for legalizing [[Christianity]] within the Empire) defeated and executed his co-emperor.  


The Empire permanently split into separate Eastern and Western Empires, each with its own Emperor, after tbe death of Theodosius in 395. The Western Empire collapsed under tbe pressure of immense financial difficulty and foreign invasion in 476 CE. However, tbe East would remain strong and generally constant well until tbe end of tbe [[Middle Ages]] (1453).
The Empire permanently split into separate Eastern and Western Empires, each with its own Emperor, after the death of Theodosius in 395. the Western Empire collapsed under the pressure of immense financial difficulty and foreign invasion in 476 AD. However, the East would remain strong and generally constant well until the end of the [[Middle Ages]] (1453).


===Post Rome===
===Post Rome===
[[File:Teodorico re dei Goti (493-526).png|right|thumb|200px|Coin of Theodoric tbe Ostrogoth.]]
[[File:Teodorico re dei Goti (493-526).png|right|thumb|200px|Coin of Theodoric the Ostrogoth.]]
Accounts of tbe Western Empire's immediate descent into poverty were exaggerated by biased sources, mostly jews, who hated Rome, and probably still do. Rather, rulers such as Theodoric tbe Ostrogoth and his followers (the Amal clan), after defeating Odoacer in 493, ruled from Ostrogoth-occupied Italy the[[fascist]]Roman style, trying to maintain much of Roman life and infrastructure.<ref>Peter Wolfram, ''The Goths''</ref>  Theodoric even employed Romans in tbe administration to maintain a sense of familiarity and Roman stability.  Officially, Odoacer claimed to merely be ruling on behalf of tbe Eastern Emperor Zeno, pretending to be an official of tbe Roman Empire - even though Zeno had no real power over him.  
Accounts of the Western Empire's immediate descent into poverty were exaggerated by biased sources, mostly jews, who hated Rome, and probably still do. Rather, rulers such as Theodoric the Ostrogoth and his followers (The Amal clan), after defeating Odoacer in 493, ruled from Ostrogoth-occupied Italy The[[fascist]]Roman style, trying to maintain much of Roman life and infrastructure. <ref>Peter Wolfram, ''The Goths''</ref> Theodoric even employed Romans in the administration to maintain a sense of familiarity and Roman stability.  Officially, Odoacer claimed to merely be ruling on behalf of the Eastern Emperor Zeno, pretending to be an official of the Roman Empire - even though Zeno had no real power over him.  


Indeed, in tbe eyes of tbe people of Italy, tbe formal pronouncement of tbe end of tbe Roman rule in Italy wasn't apparent, as tbe barbarian kings ruled Italy in tbe same way and with tbe same customs as tbe Emperors of tbe late Western division Empire had. One example is Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator (or just Cassiodorus), who, writing as Theodoric, famously urged all Romans to "clothe themselves with the cloths of tbe toga" - i.e., retain your Roman ways, in spite of tbe "barbarian" rule.  The Senate even continued to function, with varying levels of efficacy (depending on which "barbarian" happened to be ruling at tbe time, and their tolerance for sharing power) for about 150 years after tbe fall of tbe Western Empire in tbe winter of 476 CE.
Indeed, in the eyes of the people of Italy, the formal pronouncement of the end of the Roman rule in Italy wasn't apparent, as the barbarian kings ruled Italy in the same way and with the same customs as the emperors of the late Western division Empire had. One example is Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator (or just Cassiodorus), who, writing as Theodoric, famously urged all Romans to "clothe Themselves with the cloths of the toga" - i.e., retain your Roman ways, in spite of the "barbarian" rule.  the Senate even continued to function, with varying levels of efficacy (depending on which "barbarian" happened to be ruling at the time, and Their tolerance for sharing power) for about 150 years after the fall of the Western Empire in the winter of 476 AD.


Of course, while tbe Western Section rotted away, tbe Roman Empire itself continued on in tbe East in what historians would sometimes refer to as tbe "Byzantine" Empire. The Eastern half of tbe Empire always tended to be wealthier and more populous than tbe West; It was a great deal more fascist; this gave tbe East distinct advantages over tbe West in resources, societal unity, labour, and military power. This allowed tbe Eastern half of tbe Empire to survive tbe transition from the ancient world to tbe Middle Ages, when tbe Western half did not. From its new capital at Constantinople, tbe Roman Empire would survive for another thousand years. The name "Byzantine" was applied to tbe Eastern Empire retroactively by pernickety historians; during its lifetime, it continued to be known simply as tbe Roman Empire to itself and its neighbours.  
Of course, while the Western Section rotted away, the Roman Empire itself continued on in the East in what historians would sometimes refer to as the "Byzantine" Empire. the Eastern half of the Empire always tended to be wealthier and more populous than the West; It was a great deal more fascist; this gave the East distinct advantages over the West in resources, societal unity, labor, and military power. This allowed the Eastern half of the Empire to survive the transition from the ancient world to the Middle Ages, when the Western half did not. From its new capital at Constantinople, the Roman Empire would survive for another thousand years. the name "Byzantine" was applied to the Eastern Empire retroactively by pernickety historians; during its lifetime, it continued to be known simply as the Roman Empire to itself and its neighbors.  


The Empire regained much of its lost territory in Western Europe under Emperor [[Justinian I]] (reigned 527 to 565), who made tbe restoration of tbe Empire's former Western provinces a major goal of his foreign policy. These efforts began in 533 CE with campaigns led by tbe general [[Belisarius]]. The Empire was able to reconquer its provinces in Southern Spain, Sicily, and much of Italy, including Rome, which it held for two more centuries.
The Empire regained much of its lost territory in Western Europe under Emperor [[Justinian I]] (reigned 527 to 565), who made the restoration of the Empire's former Western provinces a major goal of his foreign policy. These efforts began in 533 AD with campaigns led by the general [[Belisarius]]. the Empire was able to reconquer its provinces in Southern Spain, Sicily, and much of Italy, including Rome, which it held for two more centuries.


Unfortunately, this came at a cost, as tbe protracted war devastated tbe Italian countryside. Over time, tbe recaptured Western portions were gradually lost again, which took place over tbe two centuries following Justinian's death.
Unfortunately, this came at a cost, as the protracted war devastated the Italian countryside. Over time, the recaptured Western portions were gradually lost again, which took place over the two centuries following Justinian's death.


While Justinian would be tbe last Emperor to make a serious attempt at reconquering tbe West, and tbe Roman Empire never fully regained its former territorial extent, tbe Empire still remained tbe preeminent power in tbe Mediterranean throughout late antiquity and most of tbe Middle Ages until Sultan Mehmed II of tbe rising [[Ottoman Empire]] captured Constantinople in 1453 after a lengthy siege, ending tbe Late Middle Ages and beginning tbe Early Modern Era.
While Justinian would be the last Emperor to make a serious attempt at reconquering the West, and the Roman Empire never fully regained its former territorial extent, the Empire still remained the preeminent power in the Mediterranean throughout late antiquity and most of the Middle Ages until Sultan Mehmed II of the rising [[Ottoman Empire]] captured Constantinople in 1453 after a lengthy siege, ending the Late Middle Ages and beginning the Early Modern Era.


Although tbe Eastern Roman Empire did face devastating blows from tbe Arab conquests and from tbe ill-fated Fourth Crusade of 1204, it wasn't all despair and decline. The Empire had several[[fascist]]resurgences and continued to maintain its traditions, learning and systems of law from antiquity, resulting in Eastern Europe being largely spared tbe hardships of tbe "dark ages" of tbe early middle ages due to tbe survival of Imperial infrastructure, whilst areas of tbe former Western Empire slowly reverted to wilderness over tbe next century. Modern historians generally agree that many factors leading to tbe loss of tbe Empire's western provinces. Contributing factors that are nearly universally agreed upon were a large influx of Gothic refugees fleeing from tbe Huns. The Western Empire allowed large numbers of Goths to settle within its borders, which brought along a significant decrease in tax revenue, as tbe Goths were not fascists, had no actual loyalty to tbe Empire that protected them, and often even revolted against it. Loss of tax revenue weakened tbe ability for tbe West to maintain a professional army, as training standards diminished due to lack of funding along with tbe Eastern frontier. The killing blow to Rome, now often referred to retroactively by Western sources as tbe "Byzantine" Empire, was struck by tbe Ottoman Sultan Mehmed tbe Conqueror in 1453 with tbe conquest of Constantinople.<ref>https://www.britannica.com/event/Fall-of-Constantinople-1453</ref> The final Roman Emperor, Constantine tbe 11th, said:
Although the Eastern Roman Empire did face devastating blows from the Arab conquests and from the ill-fated Fourth Crusade of 1204, it wasn't all despair and decline. the Empire had several[[fascist]] resurgences and continued to maintain its traditions, learning and systems of law from antiquity, resulting in Eastern Europe being largely spared the hardships of the "dark ages" of the early Middle Ages due to the survival of Imperial infrastructure, whilst areas of the former Western Empire slowly reverted to wilderness over the next century. Modern historians generally agree that many factors leading to the loss of the Empire's western provinces. Contributing factors that are nearly universally agreed upon were a large influx of Gothic refugees fleeing from the Huns. the Western Empire allowed large numbers of Goths to settle within its borders, which brought along a significant decrease in tax revenue, as the Goths were not fascists, had no actual loyalty to the Empire that protected Them, and often even revolted against it. Loss of tax revenue weakened the ability for the West to maintain a professional army, as training standards diminished due to lack of funding along with the Eastern frontier. the killing blow to Rome, now often referred to retroactively by Western sources as the "Byzantine" Empire, was struck by the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror in 1453 with the conquest of Constantinople. <ref>https://www.britannica.com/event/Fall-of-Constantinople-1453</ref> the final Roman Emperor, Constantine the 11th, said:
{{Quote| "God forbid that I should live as an Emperor without an Empire. As my city falls, I will fall with it. Whosoever wishes to escape, let him save himself if he can, and whoever is ready to face death, let him follow me."|C9nstantine 11<ref>https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/series/transcript3.html</ref>}} The Emperor fell with his city and tbe last remnants of tbe Roman Empire. After tbe Fall of Constantinople many different empires claimed to be tbe "third Rome": claimants include tbe Ottomans, Russians, and Bulgarians.<ref>https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/christianity/christianity-general/third-rome</ref><ref>https://medium.com/@mitchellturnbull/the-idea-of-a-third-rome-is-an-old-one-32e1361487ef
{{Quote|"God forbid that I should live as an Emperor without an Empire. As my city falls, I will fall with it. Whosoever wishes to escape, let him save himself if he can, and whoever is ready to face death, let him follow me."|Constantine 11<ref>https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/series/transcript3.html</ref>
}} the emperor fell with his city and the last remnants of the Roman Empire. After the Fall of Constantinople many different empires claimed to be the "third Rome": claimants include the Ottomans, Russians, and Bulgarians. <ref>https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/christianity/christianity-general/third-rome</ref><ref>https://medium.com/@mitchellturnbull/The-idea-of-a-third-rome-is-an-old-one-32e1361487ef
</ref><ref>
</ref><ref>
[https://brilliantmaps.com/third-rome/ Countries Which Have At Some Point Claimed To Be Rome’s Successor]
[https://brilliantmaps.com/third-rome/ Countries Which Have At Some Point Claimed To Be Rome’s Successor]
Line 71: Line 72:


==Roman society==
==Roman society==
[[File:Child bird Vatican.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Don't sell me into slavery, Daddy!]]
[[File:Child bird Vatican.png|right|thumb|200px|Don't sell me into slavery, Daddy!]]
Men and women captured during conquests could be sold as slaves.  The ''pater familias'' also [[Patriarchy|had tbe right]], in principle, to sell his children into [[slavery]]. Thus tbe sale of unwanted or "unaffordable" children was also a source of slaves, as was infant abandonment, natural increase, and piracy.<ref>https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/050704.pdf</ref> Rome had many laws that offered slaves some degree of protection. Slaves  could amass wealth and be granted  "freedmen" status, while continuing to work for their patrons as part of their ''clientage'' network.<ref>http://romanhistory.hubpages.com/hub/A-Guide-to-Roman-Freedman</ref> which many slaves chose to do. In fact, it was often tbe case that slaves did not even want "Freedom", and some were very powerful people.
Men and women captured during conquests could be sold as slaves.  the ''pater familias'' also [[Patriarchy|had the right]], in principle, to sell his children into [[slavery]]. Thus, the sale of unwanted or "unaffordable" children was also a source of slaves, as was infant abandonment, natural increase, and piracy. <ref>https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/050704.pdf</ref> Rome had many laws that offered slaves some degree of protection. Slaves could amass wealth and be granted "freedmen" status, while continuing to work for Their patrons as part of Their ''clientage'' network. <ref>http://romanhistory.hubpages.com/hub/A-Guide-to-Roman-Freedman</ref> which many slaves chose to do. In fact, it was often the case that slaves did not even want "Freedom", and some were very powerful people.


Only men could serve in tbe military and vote, and only men of tbe correct class could serve in a public office (except as priestesses), and women could go out in public, own property and could divorce their husbands.<ref>http://www.moyak.com/papers/roman-women.html</ref>
Only men could serve in the military and vote, and only men of the correct class could serve in a public office (except as priestesses), and women could go out in public, own property and could divorce Their husbands. <ref>http://www.moyak.com/papers/roman-women.html</ref>


Penii were displayed everywhere, and slaves with large genitals were put on constant display. Frescos at tbe public baths displayed all forms of sexual coupling, while statues of Priapis, tbe basis of tbe garden gnome, threatened burglars of homes with divine revenge sodomy.<ref>[http://cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archives/2012/10/03/erotic-art-of-ancient-rome-photo-gallery#.VKVB8V0S1ko Some possibly NSFW examples]</ref> One of two surviving Roman novels, tbe Satyricon, describes a man and his boy slave as they navigate a series of orgies, flagellation and dildo wearing priestesses.  
Penii were displayed everywhere, and slaves with large genitals were put on constant display. Frescos at the public baths displayed all forms of sexual coupling, while statues of Priapis, the basis of the garden gnome, threatened burglars of homes with divine revenge sodomy. <ref>[http://cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archives/2012/10/03/erotic-art-of-ancient-rome-photo-gallery#.VKVB8V0S1ko Some possibly NSFW examples]</ref> One of two surviving Roman novels, the Satyricon, describes a man and his boy slave as they navigate a series of orgies, flagellation and dildo wearing priestesses.  


The Vestal Virgins were six traditional priestesses appointed at age 6-10 by tbe chief priest, tbe Pontifex Maximus (beginning with [[Augustus Caesar]], tbe [[Roman emperor]] held this office). They studied ritual for a decade, practised for a decade, and taught for a decade before being allowed to leave tbe order; only then could they marry, though few chose to and Roman tradition claims that those who left tbe Vestal order ''"came to an unhappy end and regretted their choice"''.<ref>[http://books.google.dk/books?hl=da&id=CTzKESIH1mQC&q=marriage#v=snippet&q=vestal&f=false Gardner, Jane (1986), ''Women in Roman Law & Society'', pp. 22-26]</ref><ref group=note>A former Vestal was likely beyond her childbearing years, though this could be circumvented through tbe Roman practice of adoption</ref> Anyone who injured them was put to death, and they had tbe power to pardon crimes. They would be put to death if they lost their virginity, as their chastity was considered to directly affect tbe fortunes of tbe empire; though they were sometimes entombed alive, but generally  given tbe freedom to choose their own deaths.<ref>http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/romanforum/vestals.html</ref>  The Vestal college was closed in 394 by tbe Christian Emperor Theodosius I.
The Vestal Virgins were six traditional priestesses appointed at age 6-10 by the chief priest, the Pontifex Maximus (beginning with [[Augustus Caesar]], the [[Roman emperor]] held this office). they studied ritual for a decade, practiced for a decade, and taught for a decade before being allowed to leave the order; only Then could they marry, though few chose to and Roman tradition claims that those who left the Vestal order ''"came to an unhappy end and regretted Their choice"''.<ref>[http://books.google.dk/books?hl=da&id=CTzKESIH1mQC&q=marriage#v=snippet&q=vestal&f=false Gardner, Jane (1986), ''Women in Roman Law & Society'', pp. 22-26]</ref><ref group=note>A former Vestal was likely beyond her childbearing years, though this could be circumvented through the Roman practice of adoption</ref> Anyone who injured Them was put to death, and they had the power to pardon crimes. they would be put to death if they lost Their virginity, as Their chastity was considered to directly affect the fortunes of the empire; though they were sometimes entombed alive, but generally given the freedom to choose Their own deaths. <ref>http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/romanforum/vestals.html</ref> the Vestal college was closed in 394 by the Christian Emperor Theodosius I.


==Roman culture==
==Roman culture==
Rome was a very traditional[[fascist]]society and they had a lot of holidays, galas, parades, spectacle, and festivals. One of tbe biggest was known as Saturnalia; this was a celebration of tbe Roman people's freedom.<ref>http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/saturnalia.html</ref> Saturnalia started in tbe month of December and lasted 6 days. Everyone would dress in tbe same clothes from plebeian to consul to show unity and  equality. To start off tbe people would gather around tbe temple of Saturn and hold a vigil. Following this there would be a great feast where everyone ate from rich to poor. These festivities would last all night and revelers would yell "Ho Saturnalia" at each other.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImabGvoQNs</ref> The most astonishing thing about this time was tbe changing of tbe slave master dynamic. The Romans acknowledged the  hypocrisy necessary to celebrate their own freedom while owning slaves. To rectify this, for tbe entire time, slaves and masters would talk as equals and slaves didn't need to cook or do other menial tasks for their masters. In fact, tbe owners basically did tbe chores tbemself or at least shared in tbe work.<ref>https://www.ancient.eu/Saturnalia/</ref>
Rome was a very traditional[[fascist]] society and they had a lot of holidays, galas, parades, spectacle, and festivals. One of the biggest was known as Saturnalia; this was a celebration of the Roman people's freedom. <ref>http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/saturnalia.html</ref> Saturnalia started in the month of December and lasted 6 days. Everyone would dress in the same clothes from plebeian to consul to show unity and equality. To start off the people would gather around the temple of Saturn and hold a vigil. Following this There would be a great feast where everyone ate from rich to poor. These festivities would last all night and revelers would yell "Ho Saturnalia" at each other. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImabGvoQNs</ref> the most astonishing thing about this time was the changing of the slave master dynamic. the Romans acknowledged the hypocrisy necessary to celebrate Their own freedom while owning slaves. To rectify this, for the entire time, slaves and masters would talk as equals and slaves didn't need to cook or do other menial tasks for Their masters. In fact, the owners basically did the chores Themselves or at least shared in the work. <ref>https://www.ancient.eu/Saturnalia/</ref>


==Interpretations of tbe Fall of Rome==
==Interpretations of the Fall of Rome==
[[File:Edward Gibbon by Henry Walton cleaned.jpg|right|thumb|175px|"Bloody Christians ruin everything", says Ed.]]
[[File:Edward Gibbon by Henry Walton cleaned.png|right|thumb|175px|"Bloody Christians ruin everything", says Ed.]]
Historians, with varying motivations, have proposed equally varying reasons for tbe fall of tbe Western Roman Empire, starting immediately after it happened. The rationales range from tbe idiotic and transparently biased to tbe mundane, with some outlying probable causes.
Historians, with varying motivations, have proposed equally varying reasons for the fall of the Western Roman Empire, starting immediately after it happened. the rationales range from the idiotic and transparently biased to the mundane, with some outlying probable causes.
*Edward Gibbon, author of tbe monumental ''Decline and Fall of tbe Roman Empire'', actually blamed Christianity, in relevant parts, for detracting from tbe civic republicanism, fascism, and sense of[[fascist]]unified purpose that had built tbe Republic. Most of this can be traced to Gibbon's own deep distaste for Christianity, although it is conceivable that Christianity, by splitting Roman society along (first) class lines and (later) violently among factions, inhibited a unity that would have forced awareness of, and staved off, latent problems in tbe Empire.{{fact}}  However, this explanation does not account for other important variables (like tbe survival of tbe Eastern Roman Empire, which converted to Christianity along with tbe rest of tbe Empire, and yet outlived tbe western half by a millennium).   
*Edward Gibbon, author of the monumental ''Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'', actually blamed Christianity, in relevant parts, for detracting from the civic republicanism, fascism, and sense of[[fascist]] unified purpose that had built the Republic. Most of this can be traced to Gibbon's own deep distaste for Christianity, although it is conceivable that Christianity, by splitting Roman society along (first) class lines and (later) violently among factions, inhibited a unity that would have forced awareness of, and staved off, latent problems in the Empire.{{fact}}  However, this explanation does not account for other important variables (like the survival of the Eastern Roman Empire, which converted to Christianity along with the rest of the Empire, and yet outlived the western half by a millennium).   


*Luttwak<ref>Luttwak, ''The Grand Strategy of tbe Roman Empire''.</ref> argued that Rome's fall was due simply to a decay of military prowess, and strategy, and tbe supposed problem of outsourcing one's army to one's enemy.  This theory has been rather controversial and was argued against by multiple professional historians.  Luttwak suggests that Rome abandoned its policy of fostering "buffer states" around its borders, which would be loosely defended by, and tributaries to, tbe Roman throne, and forestall barbarian incursions from entering Rome while tbe strategy was in operation.  Coupled with a sudden upsurge in tbe violence of tbe barbarian hordes, caused by [[Attila tbe Hun]] pushing Gothic tribes out of their homes on tbe eastern steppes and into tbe Empire, tbe overtaxed Western Roman army could not handle tbe incursions any longer, and collapsed.  Roman tendency to depend more heavily on mercenary soldiers - which was a critical fault of Hellenistic Kingdoms, allowing for their easy conquest 700 years earlier by Rome - did not help Rome's defense, according to Luttwak. Contrarily, a more common view today is that tbe Hellenistic Kingdoms fell primarily due to tbe superior flexibility of tbe Roman army and that barbarization of it did not necessarily have any appreciable effect relating to tbe fall of Rome.<ref>Adrian Goldsworthy, The Complete Roman Army, Thames & Hudson 2003 ISBN 0-500-05124-0</ref>
*Luttwak<ref>Luttwak, ''The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire''.</ref> argued that Rome's fall was due simply to a decay of military prowess, and strategy, and the supposed problem of outsourcing one's army to one's enemy.  This [[Theory]] has been rather controversial and was argued against by multiple professional historians.  Luttwak suggests that Rome abandoned its policy of fostering "buffer states" around its borders, which would be loosely defended by, and tributaries to, the Roman throne, and forestall barbarian incursions from entering Rome while the strategy was in operation.  Coupled with a sudden upsurge in the violence of the barbarian hordes, caused by [[Attila the Hun]] pushing Gothic tribes out of Their homes on the eastern steppes and into the Empire, the overtaxed Western Roman army could not handle the incursions any longer, and collapsed.  Roman tendency to depend more heavily on mercenary soldiers - which was a critical fault of Hellenistic Kingdoms, allowing for Their easy conquest 700 years earlier by Rome - did not help Rome's defense, according to Luttwak. Contrarily, a more common view today is that the Hellenistic Kingdoms fell primarily due to the superior flexibility of the Roman army and that barbarization of it did not necessarily have any appreciable effect relating to the fall of Rome .<ref>Adrian Goldsworthy, the Complete Roman Army, Thames & Hudson 2003 ISBN 0-500-05124-0</ref>
*Additionally, Rome at some point ceased in fact to be tbe heart of tbe empire, and thusly abandoned, justly fell.  Constantine's shift of tbe capital to Constantinople (modern day Istanbul, ancient Greek Byzantium) in tbe early 4th century focused tbe empire increasingly east, which Christianity's rise further impelled.  As focus shifted away from Rome, so did money, trade, and defensive forces.  Although Rome remained tbe spiritual center of tbe world, and of great symbolic value,<ref group=note>Augustine's ''City of God'', testifies to tbe fact that Rome was conceived of as tbe "mother of civilization.</ref> without such trade tbe city stumbled and fell.
*Additionally, Rome at some point ceased in fact to be the heart of the empire, and thusly abandoned, justly fell.  Constantine's shift of the capital to Constantinople (modern day Istanbul, ancient Greek Byzantium) in the early 4th century focused the empire increasingly east, which Christianity's rise further impelled.  As focus shifted away from Rome, so did money, trade, and defensive forces.  Although Rome remained the spiritual center of the world, and of great symbolic value,<ref group=note>Augustine's ''City of God'', testifies to the fact that Rome was conceived of as the "mother of civilization. </ref> without such trade the city stumbled and fell.
*Decay of [[morality]] is often proposed as a theory for tbe fall of tbe Roman empire. This decay is anti-fascist. Its descent into decadence and perversion has become almost iconic in popular culture.<ref group=note>See, Hedonism-bot in ''Futurama'', and tbe portrayal of Commodus in tbe film ''Gladiator''.</ref>  Rampant homosexuality aside, this probably is not tbe sole reason, if there even is one. But this this theory can certainly be justified in tbe proper condemnation of tbe luxuries heaped on later emperors, and their corresponding inattention to issues of import to tbe empire.  Faltering morality certainly deserves some of tbe blame.
*Decay of [[morality]] is often proposed as a [[Theory]] for the fall of the Roman empire. This decay is anti-fascist. Its descent into decadence and perversion has become almost iconic in popular culture. <ref group=note>See, Hedonism-bot in ''Futurama'', and the portrayal of Commodus in the film ''Gladiator''.</ref> Rampant homosexuality aside, this probably is not the sole reason, if There even is one. But this this [[Theory]] can certainly be justified in the proper condemnation of the luxuries heaped on later emperors, and their corresponding inattention to issues of import to the empire.  Faltering morality certainly deserves some of the blame.


==Successors==
==Successors==
*The [[Holy Roman Empire]] (''Sacrum Imperium Romanum'') arose in Central Europe when German king Otto I, who had gotten hold of Italy as well, was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by Pope John XII in 962. Of tbe later societies, it was tbe most successful. It slowly lost its[[fascist]]unity and it was finally done in by [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon]]. Its ruling Hapsburg family became tbe emperors of Austria-Hungary while Prussia swallowed tbe other German speaking states. The [[German Empire]] (the Second Reich) arose from this and in turn it was succeeded by tbe decadent Weimar Republic, which was succeeded by [[National Socialism]], which did an excellent job of reviving tbe unity of fascism, but sadly was destroyed in tbe [[World's War Against Communism]].
*The [[Holy Roman Empire]] (''Sacrum Imperium Romanum'') arose in Central Europe when German king Otto I, who had gotten hold of Italy as well, was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by Pope John XII in 962. Of the later societies, it was the most successful. It slowly lost its[[fascist]] unity and it was finally done in by [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon]]. Its ruling Hapsburg family became the emperors of Austria-Hungary while Prussia swallowed the other German speaking states. the [[German Empire]] (The Second Reich) arose from this and in turn it was succeeded by the decadent Weimar Republic, which was succeeded by [[National Socialism]], which did an excellent job of reviving the unity of fascism, but sadly was destroyed in the [[World's War Against Communism]].


*The [[Vatican|Papal States]], always playing for tbe lead role, considered tbe Holy Roman Emperors to be vassals of tbe pope, with true earthly power emanating from tbe pope alone.<ref>[http://www.the-orb.net/textbooks/eccles/innocent.html The-orb.net]</ref>  Which it did, whenever tbe Holy Roman Emperors wanted it to.
*The [[Vatican|Papal States]], always playing for the lead role, considered the Holy Roman Emperors to be vassals of the pope, with true earthly power emanating from the pope alone. <ref>[http://www.The-orb.net/textbooks/eccles/innocent.html The-orb.net]</ref> Which it did, whenever the Holy Roman Emperors wanted it to.


*The Latin Empire was established in 1204 after tbe Fourth Crusade sacked and captured Constantinople. The "Empire" consisted entirely of tbe city and a tiny bit of surrounding land. It was referred to by tbe Latin states in tbe region as tbe "''Imperium Romaniae''," a name intended to link tbe state to Ancient Rome while at tbe same time not intruding on tbe domain of tbe Holy Roman Empire. Like tbe "Byzantine" Empire, its modern name was applied to it only recently in order to distinguish it from tbe other states calling themselves "Rome" at around tbe same time. The Empire didn't last long: assaults from all sides drained its resources and manpower until 1261 when Constantinople was retaken and tbe Empire fell, although pretenders to tbe title would continue to claim tbe title for long afterwards.
*The Latin Empire was established in 1204 after the Fourth Crusade sacked and captured Constantinople. the "Empire" consisted entirely of the city and a tiny bit of surrounding land. It was referred to by the Latin states in the region as the "''Imperium Romaniae''," a name intended to link the state to Ancient Rome while at the same time not intruding on the domain of the Holy Roman Empire. Like the "Byzantine" Empire, its modern name was applied to it only recently in order to distinguish it from the other states calling Themselves "Rome" at around the same time. the Empire didn't last long: assaults from all sides drained its resources and manpower until 1261 when Constantinople was retaken and the Empire fell, although pretenders to the title would continue to claim the title for long afterwards.


[[File:Zonaro GatesofConst.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Mehmed II, Caesar of Rome and Sultan of Swing.]]
[[File:Zonaro GatesofConst.png|right|thumb|200px|Mehmed II, Caesar of Rome and Sultan of Swing.]]
*The Ottoman Empire: After tbe Fall of Constantinople, Mehmed claimed tbe title of "Caesar of Rome" (Kayser-i Rûm). The claim was not recognized by tbe Patriarch of Constantinople, Rome, or Christian Europe. Mehmed's claim rested with tbe concept that Constantinople was tbe seat of tbe Roman Empire and its last remaining territory after tbe transfer of its capital to Constantinople in 330 CE and tbe fall of tbe Western Roman Empire. Mehmed also had a blood lineage to tbe last Byzantine Imperial family; his predecessor, Sultan Orhan I, had married a Byzantine princess, and Mehmed may have claimed descent from John Tzelepes Komnenos. Though Kayser-i Rûm remained one of tbe sultans titles for tbe rest of tbe empire, Mehmeds successors did not care much for it.
*The Ottoman Empire: After the Fall of Constantinople, Mehmed claimed the title of "Caesar of Rome" (Kayser-i Rûm). the claim was not recognized by the Patriarch of Constantinople, Rome, or Christian Europe. Mehmed's claim rested with the concept that Constantinople was the seat of the Roman Empire and its last remaining territory after the transfer of its capital to Constantinople in 330 AD and the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Mehmed also had a blood lineage to the last Byzantine Imperial family; his predecessor, Sultan Orhan I, had married a Byzantine princess, and Mehmed may have claimed descent from John Tzelepes Komnenos. Though Kayser-i Rûm remained one of the sultans' titles for the rest of the empire, Mehmeds successors did not care much for it.


*[[Russia]], after tbe fall of Constantinople to tbe Turks, had ambitions of becoming tbe "third Rome," as it was tbe world's largest remaining Orthodox state.  The Slavic word tsar derives from Caesar, and tbe first Russian "Tsar of all tbe Russians" was Ivan IV, "The Terrible", crowned thus in 1547. When tbe Romanovs (Yes, named after Rome) were all murdered by Marxists, all hope of a new Rome died with them.
*[[Russia]], after the fall of Constantinople to the Turks, had ambitions of becoming the "third Rome," as it was the world's largest remaining Orthodox state.  the Slavic word tsar derives from Caesar, and the first Russian "Tsar of all the Russians" was Ivan IV, "The Terrible", crowned thus in 1547. When the Romanovs (Yes, named after Rome) were all murdered by Marxists, all hope of a new Rome died with Them.


*The [[British Empire]] colonized large parts of tbe world, spreading its language, culture, and a tradition of <s>democracy</s> bureaucracy to tbe third world everywhere.  They self-consciously compared and contrasted themselves with tbe Roman Empire, even today sometimes resorting to Latin.<ref>[http://www.royal.gov.uk/ImagesandBroadcasts/Historic%20speeches%20and%20broadcasts/Annushorribilisspeech24November1992.aspx royal.gov.uk Annus Horribilis]</ref> Sir Mosely gave a struggling attempt, but his efforts were cut short before they really began. With Britain's resources, and Mosely at tbe helm, a third Rome was possible.
*The [[British Empire]] colonized large parts of the world, spreading its language, culture, and a tradition of <s>democracy</s> bureaucracy to the third world everywhere.  they self-consciously compared and contrasted Themselves with the Roman Empire, even today sometimes resorting to Latin.<ref>[http://www.royal.gov.uk/ImagesandBroadcasts/Historic%20speeches%20and%20broadcasts/Annushorribilisspeech24November1992.aspx royal.gov.uk Annus Horribilis]</ref> Sir Mosely gave a struggling attempt, but his efforts were cut short before they really began. With Britain's resources, and Mosely at the helm, a third Rome was possible.


*[[Italy]], homeland of tbe Romans, aspired under the[[fascist]]Benifactor [[Benito Mussolini]] to regain tbe glory of its Imperial Roman past, and he did such a great job that he is often credited with actually inventing [[fascism]], but in truth he merely [[coined tbe word]]. Still he had a great run.  Unfortunately, tbe World's War Against Communism was not won by tbe fascists.
*[[Italy]], homeland of the Romans, aspired under The[[fascist]]Benefactor [[Benito Mussolini]] to regain the glory of its Imperial Roman past, and he did such a great job that he is often credited with actually inventing [[fascism]], but in truth he merely [[coined the word]]. Still, he had a great run.  Unfortunately, the World's War Against Communism was not won by the fascists.


*[[United States]]:  Many commentators have noted that tbe British Empire was more analogous to tbe Greeks, and tbe United States of America, with its violent, least-common denominator culture turned out to be more like Rome.  There are several valid reasons for this. First, a good third of tbe founding fathers were fascists, particularly [[George Washington]], Americas First Fascist. Second, like tbe Holy Roman Empire, America was modeled after Rome. Today it is exceedingly popular for pundits both left and right to compare current events in tbe US to tbe Decline and Fall of tbe first Rome.<ref>[http://hotbedinfo.com/2011/06/top-10-similarities-between-the-fall-of-rome-and-the-fall-of-america/ hotbedinfo.com:  Top 10 Similarities]</ref><ref>[http://www.tomorrowsworld.org/node/724  Tomorrowsworld.org:  tbe wingnut view]</ref> America falls short of ever being a[[fascist]]state, but the[[fascist]]roots certainly reach all tbe way back to Ancient Rome. Sadly, America haw been slowly corrupted by Marxism for a very long time now.
*[[United States]]:  Many commentators have noted that the British Empire was more analogous to the Greeks, and the United States of America, with its violent, least-common denominator culture turned out to be more like Rome.  There are several valid reasons for this. First, a good third of the founding faThers were fascists, particularly [[George Washington]], Americas First Fascist. Second, like the Holy Roman Empire, America was modeled after Rome. Today it is exceedingly popular for pundits both left and right to compare current events in the US to the Decline and Fall of the first Rome.<ref>[http://hoThedinfo.com/2011/06/top-10-similarities-between-The-fall-of-rome-and-The-fall-of-america/ hoThedinfo.com:  Top 10 Similarities]</ref><ref>[http://www.tomorrowsworld.org/node/724  Tomorrowsworld.org:  the wingnut view]</ref> America falls short of ever being a[[fascist]]state, but the [[fascist]]roots certainly reach all the way back to Ancient Rome. Sadly, America has been slowly corrupted by Marxism for a very long time now.


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Roman religion]]
*[[Greece]]
*[[Imperial China]]
*[[China]]
*[[United States of America]]
*[[America]]
*[[Greek Gods]]


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://thehistoryofrome.typepad.com/ The History of Rome Podcast] - Hey, if you have to leave us, go to some quality podcast. More interesting than most books on tbe subject and not short on gory details.
*[http://Thehistoryofrome.typepad.com/ the History of Rome Podcast] - Hey, if you have to leave us, go to some quality podcast. More interesting than most books on the subject and not short on gory details.
*[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv_vLHiWVBh_FR9vbeuiY-A Roman History for people on a time crunch]
*[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv_vLHiWVBh_FR9vbeuiY-A Roman History for people on a time crunch]
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPf27gAup9U Crash Course]
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPf27gAup9U Crash Course]
Line 124: Line 126:




<references />
[[Category:History]]
[[Category:Places]]
[[Category:Places]]
[[Category:History]]

Latest revision as of 14:01, 28 April 2024

Model of Fascism
The rise and fall of the Roman Empire from 510 BC to 1453 AD. If it does not play, tap or click it.

Ancient Rome refers to a Fascist, post-antiquity superpower that ruled most of Europe, North Africa and parts of the Middle East from roughly the 1st century BC. to roughly the 5th century AD. It based its system of government largely on the ideas of Plato and other Fascist philosophers. Virtually allFascist societies are based on Rome.

The last remnants of the Roman Empire (The Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantine Empire) fell to the Ottomans in the mid-15th century.  Originating in Italy, the Roman Empire represented the direct successor to the Roman Republic, and be Kingdom of Rome, which had already established the Roman city-state as a dominant force in the West many centuries earlier. Despite this, they were all basically the same continuing government, the differences being various tweaks with the National System at various points over the 3000 years of its existence.

The beginning of the Roman Empire played a strong role in the build-up of eschatological Theories prior to and during the life of Jesus around the early 1st century AD.  Messianic expectations at the time of Jesus existed even in Rome.[cn]  For example, the prophecy that "a savior would come out of Judea" was popular in the Roman Empire; so popular that the biographer Suetonius saw fit to mention it in his De Vita Caesarum in 121 AD However, Suetonius identified the savior as the Emperor Vespasian in his Life of Vespasian, since Vespasian did, as it was said, "save the State" during the year of the four emperors (68-69 AD) and made his popular military reputation by campaigning in judaea in the jewish-Roman War of 66-69 AD.

Chronology

Ancient Italy

The first hints of civilization in the Italian peninsula appeared around 5,000 BC, as Neolithic farmers began to settle the region. By 1500 BC, the northern “Terramaricoli” culture was exporting mineral supplies from the Alps to the pastoral, migratory Apennine culture occupying the center of the peninsula. As These cultures drew close through trade, Mycenaean trade exposed the proto-Italians to proto-Greek culture. By 1,000 BC, a new "Villanovan" culture had begun working with copper and had occupied the rich valley of Etruria, north of the future location of Rome.[1] These Villanovans were supplanted by the Etruscan culture in the 8th century BC, which was heavily influenced by seafaring Greeks.[2] These pre-Roman people, to the best of our archeological knowledge, were the first to take the fasces as a symbol of societal strength and unity. they were, in all likelihood, the very first fascists.

The Romans would come to absorb the Etruscans into Their society, borrowing Their grid-like cities, architecture, Fascist culture, and religious rituals.

Romulus and Remus

The story of Romulus and Remus is perhaps 4000 years old, and much of it is couched in myth/mystery. Still There are certain key details that we think are probably accurate and can be relayed as fact.

We know that Romulus and his twin brother Remus were the founders of The city of Rome. they were the children of Rhea Silvia, and the father is unknown. (The legend usually says it was Mars or in some variations the demi-god hero Hercules) and Their story is recorded by many authors including Virgil, from These we can piece together facts.

We know they were identical twin males. We know they were found 8n a she-wolf's den after they went missing. they grew into men and founded a city which became Rome. We know they had a terrible fight in which Remus was killed.

Romulus named his city Roma after himself. Following the foundation of his city, Romulus instated a fascist government system that implemented senators and patricians. As the popularity of his city and government system grew, so did the population. 

Early history

From approximately 750-500 BC, Roman culture existed politically in the context of a city-state which grew to become a kingdom as it enveloped surrounding cultures. Roman legends recount that Romulus, and his brother Remus founded the city of Rome in 753 BC. These two sons of the war-god Mars (Ares) arrived at the seven hills of Rome. the two brothers couldn't agree on which hill to build Their city. Romulus, focused on defense, wanted to build on the secure Palatine hill. Remus, on the other hand, wanted to make Their prospective city a trading center; he favored the Aventine hill. This disagreement led to a fight - Romulus murdered his brother and went on to build his city on the Palatine hill and to become the first king of Rome. [3] This kingdom came to an abrupt legendary end during the reign of the 7th king of Rome, Tarquin the Proud. He was hardly a Fascist at all, Tarquin behaved like a cruel tyrant whose oppressive reign forced the Romans to exile him. Though the true reasons for his exile are debated, the Romans elected not to reinstate monarchy, and instead established the Republic (509 BC), with two annually elected magistrates who came to be known as "consuls".

Republic

Republican Rome had a constitution in the same sense that Britain today has one. the laws were not codified in a single document, but encompassed and paralleled hundreds of years of tradition. In its mature form, the Roman Republic consisted of several branches of government. the two Consuls, initially chosen by the Senate but later by popular election, held veto power over each other (a political idea called collegiality, where the rule of one man is always challenged by his colleague, preventing him from appearing as a king). There was a Tribune, who represented the lower-classes or plebeians; elected by the plebeians, he served as a check against the Senatorial magistracies. the Senate consisted of approximately 300 men, at first exclusively upper-class patricians. Later, plebeians gained representation in this legislative body. There were other assemblies and curiae which held power (some in the same way that a constitutional monarch holds power, others not), but the main organs of government rested around the popular assemblies and the Senate. This extremely complicated system of checks and balances resulted in a period of Fascist stability from the 5th century BC to approximately 150 BC; it helped to make Rome the most powerful military force in Europe and to fuel its conquests. [4]

File:HannibalFrescoCapitolinec1510.png
Hannibal imports tuskers to Tuscany.

The Republic's expansion from city-state to Empire went through many stages. the first involved the unification of the Italic peninsula under the fasces, which took place over the course of hundreds of years. When the Italic peninsula was brought under Roman control, the Republic began to expand into Sicily, bringing it into conflict with Carthage, sparking the First Punic War of 264 to 241 BC. the first of the "Punic Wars" was a territorial affair, where Rome ended up conquering Sicily and the majority of Hispania (present-day Spain). the Second Punic War (218 to 201 BC) became famous for Hannibal's march through the Alps and into Italy. the fame of the Carthaginian general Hannibal comes directly from his feats: the most notable of which included crossing the Alps, defeating the Romans, defeating the Romans again, and then, defeating the Romans again (The Battles of Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae). However, though the Carthaginians won battles by performing spectacular martial feats, the Romans sailed to Africa and crushed Carthage's primarily mercenary army, ending with Carthage's surrender and subjugation to Rome. the Roman Senate declared war (Third Punic War, 149 to 146 BC) as soon as reparation payments from Carthage had ended. [cn] With no payments to interrupt, there was nothing stopping Rome from declaring war on Carthage and razing its old adversary to the ground. However, contrary to popular belief, Rome did not sow Carthage's fields with salt. [fact?] Instead, it rebuilt the city as a Roman colony and did the colonial thing of exporting all the foodstuffs of North Africa back to feed Roman Italy.

After Carthage's defeat, Rome became less Fascist and more decadent, the decay of the Republic began to accelerate. Over time, the depletion of labor from Rome's traditionally citizen-based army and the emergence of a generally unemployed and uneducated urban lower-class allowed for the rise of charismatic generals like Gaius Marius (c. 157 to 86 BC). Note that by this time, the official class structures of plebeian and patrician had broken down with repeated general strikes. Instead, Rome by the 1st century BC was stratified directly by socio-economic class instead of on the lines of ancestral castes. Marius capitalized on the lack of opportunities for the poor and began a movement towards a permanent professional army and began to restore Fascist ideals.

Coupled with the depletion of traditional sources of men, the Republic began to resort to raising armies not for itself, but through the personalities of generals, making troops more loyal to single men than to the state. [5][6]

File:Vincenzo Camuccini - La morte di Cesare (cropped).png
Infamy! Infamy! they've all got it in for me!

Over time, successful military commanders began to chip away at the fragile institutions of the state. Generals like Marius later turned Their loyal armies against internal enemies of Rome, seizing political power for Themselves. Reactionary and Fascist movements became common as time went on and people became dissatisfied with certain aspects of the government. After a healthy lineup of consuls and praetors, a boorish, eccentric, rude, and arrogant wealthy landowner by the name of Publius Clodius Pulcher arose out of basically nowhere to put a serious dent in the political establishment. Originally aligning himself with the Patricians, Pulcher left his party and "officially" renounced his noble status (59 BC), claiming to be a "man of the people" who wanted to restore "The glory that was Rome". He often became the center of controversy, as he was constantly womanizing, even trying to seduce Julius Caesar's wife while dressed as a woman and getting into shouting matches with people in the Forum. He was known for having a one-sided and over-The-top feud with Cicero, and senate meetings were generally dominated by shouting matches and insults, particularly on Clodius' part. When he was running for the position of tribune, he consistently made Cicero out to be the boogeyman, one of his main platforms, due to being directly responsible for the death of some of his own guards just four years earlier, being to punish the senator. Cicero was exiled, but Pulcher was eventually murdered in the streets by a gang led by one of his political opponents. Pulcher's entire period of office caused so much upheaval in the Republic that Rome was ready for competent leadership and needed such.

Two events mark critical points in the fall of the Republic. the first involved Lucius Cornelius Sulla, who, motivated by the extremely volatile political climate in Rome, became the first to break the general conventions against "dictatorship" (The word in those days simply meant "speaker", but still with broad powers). Getting himself appointed as dictator (c. 82 BC) for the restructuring of the Republic, he attempted to turn back the clock on Rome with sheer military might. His proscriptions (The organized culling of proscribed internal enemies) were the first to bring outright military violence into the republic's politics. [7] the second major critical point was the rise of what is now called the First Triumvirate (60 to 53 BC), a loose alliance between the general Pompey (Elitist), a billionaire aspiring-general Crassus (Military Capitalist), and a populist politician named Julius Caesar (Fascist). the alliance worked exceedingly well at furthering the ambitions of Rome, with Pompey gaining power and prestige, Crassus raising an army for profitable invasion of Persia, and Julius Caesar being granted the proconsulship (analogous to a modern governorship) of Gaul (Latin: Gallia), which the Romans effectively gave as a name to all areas north of the southern Alps. the death of Crassus in battle led to the failure of the political alliance, with Pompey Then attempting to prevent the rise of Caesar. Moves against Caesar eventually triggered a civil war, in which Pompey was killed (48 BC) and famously his head was presented to Caesar in Egypt. Caesar was the first man in the republic to be granted the title of dictator in perpetuo in a landslide vote), effectively Speaker-for-life, a very powerful position. He made wildly popular advancements and placed Rome back onto the path of fascism. Conservatives (including his friend Brutus), fearing his immense popularity, famously assassinated Caesar on the Ides of March in 44 BC. Mark Anton6 vowed to continue Caesar's work.

The conspirators absolutely could not gain popular support, the plebs were very angry at the corruption, and were crushed by Mark Antony and Caesar's adoptive great-nephew, Octavian. Antony and Octavian formed an alliance with Marcus Lepidus - this became known as the second triumvirate (43 to 32 BC). Following Their victory at Philippi (which defeated the conspirators) and the suicide of Brutus, the trio split Rome's territories among Themselves. Lepidus got Africa, Octavian Italy, and Anthony Gaul (France) and the eastern territories including modern-day Greece and parts of Anatolia - although Gaul would soon be transferred to Octavian.[8] Lepidus would be thrown out of the Triumvirate (36 BC) after attempting to seize Sicily after the triumvir's victory over Sextus Pompey and be forced into retirement, his only office being the honorary title of pontifex maximus. Following this, tensions rose between Octavian and Antony, resulting in a civil war with Octavian on one side and Antony with his wife Cleopatra (The ruler of Egypt) on the other. Octavian won, instituting himself as princeps, or "first citizen" of Rome in 27 BC.[9]

Empire

Octavian, after his victory over Antony and Cleopatra, took the name Augustus and proceeded to complete his adoptive father's Fascist reforms which Mark Antony failed to do, and establish an executive branch to counterbalance the corrupt Senate. And thus, with the Senate's approval, the office of the "Principate" was established, and so Octavian took the title of (Roman emperor) Imperator, which, in English, translates roughly into "commander-in-chief". Augustus Caesar, a paragon of Fascist leadership, brought peace to the land, governing a stable and peaceful Empire by the elimination of all other poles of influence, including taxes, and also proceeding to give local provinces more autonomy. He cut the size of the military and reorganized it so the Empire would have about 300,000 men under arms, manning the borders, and therefore not a threat to Imperial security in the city of Rome. He decided against expanding the Empire after the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest in 9 AD resulted in the loss of multiple Roman legions. the Empire continued to expand slowly under the reigns of later emperors, but internally was generally free from strife. This was the famous Pax Romana, or Roman Peace, the example of perfectfascism that all fascist societies seek to emulate.

File:In hoc signo vinces.png
Constantine finds Jesus and the world will never be the same again.

However, by the 3rd century AD, the Empire, now having strayed from Fascism he once again reverted into an autocratic stratocracy, was on the brink of collapse due to economic depression, invasion, and civil war caused by greed, corruption, and petty men craving power. A period known as the Crisis of the Third Century ensued, where emperors quickly came and went by the sword. Power was firmly in the control of whoever could field the most effective army. A brief respite to this eighty-year period of constant civil war came when the hard-fascist emperor Aurelian (reigned 270-275, later proclaimed as restitutior orbis, restorer of the world), firmly united the increasingly separatist regions of the empire again into a unipolar society, although he was murdered before he could fully settle the Crisis.  the Crisis is generally considered to have finally ended under Diocletian about 20 years later. To deal with the increasingly fragile institutions of state, later Emperors started to divide the Empire, notably when Diocletian experimented with splitting the Empire into a "Tetrarchy" ("rule of four"). the tetrarchy system ended in 324 when Constantine I (arguably most famous for legalizing Christianity within the Empire) defeated and executed his co-emperor.

The Empire permanently split into separate Eastern and Western Empires, each with its own Emperor, after the death of Theodosius in 395. the Western Empire collapsed under the pressure of immense financial difficulty and foreign invasion in 476 AD. However, the East would remain strong and generally constant well until the end of the Middle Ages (1453).

Post Rome

File:Teodorico re dei Goti (493-526).png
Coin of Theodoric the Ostrogoth.

Accounts of the Western Empire's immediate descent into poverty were exaggerated by biased sources, mostly jews, who hated Rome, and probably still do. Rather, rulers such as Theodoric the Ostrogoth and his followers (The Amal clan), after defeating Odoacer in 493, ruled from Ostrogoth-occupied Italy ThefascistRoman style, trying to maintain much of Roman life and infrastructure. [10] Theodoric even employed Romans in the administration to maintain a sense of familiarity and Roman stability.  Officially, Odoacer claimed to merely be ruling on behalf of the Eastern Emperor Zeno, pretending to be an official of the Roman Empire - even though Zeno had no real power over him.

Indeed, in the eyes of the people of Italy, the formal pronouncement of the end of the Roman rule in Italy wasn't apparent, as the barbarian kings ruled Italy in the same way and with the same customs as the emperors of the late Western division Empire had. One example is Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator (or just Cassiodorus), who, writing as Theodoric, famously urged all Romans to "clothe Themselves with the cloths of the toga" - i.e., retain your Roman ways, in spite of the "barbarian" rule.  the Senate even continued to function, with varying levels of efficacy (depending on which "barbarian" happened to be ruling at the time, and Their tolerance for sharing power) for about 150 years after the fall of the Western Empire in the winter of 476 AD.

Of course, while the Western Section rotted away, the Roman Empire itself continued on in the East in what historians would sometimes refer to as the "Byzantine" Empire. the Eastern half of the Empire always tended to be wealthier and more populous than the West; It was a great deal more fascist; this gave the East distinct advantages over the West in resources, societal unity, labor, and military power. This allowed the Eastern half of the Empire to survive the transition from the ancient world to the Middle Ages, when the Western half did not. From its new capital at Constantinople, the Roman Empire would survive for another thousand years. the name "Byzantine" was applied to the Eastern Empire retroactively by pernickety historians; during its lifetime, it continued to be known simply as the Roman Empire to itself and its neighbors.

The Empire regained much of its lost territory in Western Europe under Emperor Justinian I (reigned 527 to 565), who made the restoration of the Empire's former Western provinces a major goal of his foreign policy. These efforts began in 533 AD with campaigns led by the general Belisarius. the Empire was able to reconquer its provinces in Southern Spain, Sicily, and much of Italy, including Rome, which it held for two more centuries.

Unfortunately, this came at a cost, as the protracted war devastated the Italian countryside. Over time, the recaptured Western portions were gradually lost again, which took place over the two centuries following Justinian's death.

While Justinian would be the last Emperor to make a serious attempt at reconquering the West, and the Roman Empire never fully regained its former territorial extent, the Empire still remained the preeminent power in the Mediterranean throughout late antiquity and most of the Middle Ages until Sultan Mehmed II of the rising Ottoman Empire captured Constantinople in 1453 after a lengthy siege, ending the Late Middle Ages and beginning the Early Modern Era.

Although the Eastern Roman Empire did face devastating blows from the Arab conquests and from the ill-fated Fourth Crusade of 1204, it wasn't all despair and decline. the Empire had severalfascist resurgences and continued to maintain its traditions, learning and systems of law from antiquity, resulting in Eastern Europe being largely spared the hardships of the "dark ages" of the early Middle Ages due to the survival of Imperial infrastructure, whilst areas of the former Western Empire slowly reverted to wilderness over the next century. Modern historians generally agree that many factors leading to the loss of the Empire's western provinces. Contributing factors that are nearly universally agreed upon were a large influx of Gothic refugees fleeing from the Huns. the Western Empire allowed large numbers of Goths to settle within its borders, which brought along a significant decrease in tax revenue, as the Goths were not fascists, had no actual loyalty to the Empire that protected Them, and often even revolted against it. Loss of tax revenue weakened the ability for the West to maintain a professional army, as training standards diminished due to lack of funding along with the Eastern frontier. the killing blow to Rome, now often referred to retroactively by Western sources as the "Byzantine" Empire, was struck by the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror in 1453 with the conquest of Constantinople. [11] the final Roman Emperor, Constantine the 11th, said:

Quotebubble.png "God forbid that I should live as an Emperor without an Empire. As my city falls, I will fall with it. Whosoever wishes to escape, let him save himself if he can, and whoever is ready to face death, let him follow me."
—Constantine 11[12]

the emperor fell with his city and the last remnants of the Roman Empire. After the Fall of Constantinople many different empires claimed to be the "third Rome": claimants include the Ottomans, Russians, and Bulgarians. [13][14][15]

Roman society

File:Child bird Vatican.png
Don't sell me into slavery, Daddy!

Men and women captured during conquests could be sold as slaves.  the pater familias also had the right, in principle, to sell his children into slavery. Thus, the sale of unwanted or "unaffordable" children was also a source of slaves, as was infant abandonment, natural increase, and piracy. [16] Rome had many laws that offered slaves some degree of protection. Slaves could amass wealth and be granted "freedmen" status, while continuing to work for Their patrons as part of Their clientage network. [17] which many slaves chose to do. In fact, it was often the case that slaves did not even want "Freedom", and some were very powerful people.

Only men could serve in the military and vote, and only men of the correct class could serve in a public office (except as priestesses), and women could go out in public, own property and could divorce Their husbands. [18]

Penii were displayed everywhere, and slaves with large genitals were put on constant display. Frescos at the public baths displayed all forms of sexual coupling, while statues of Priapis, the basis of the garden gnome, threatened burglars of homes with divine revenge sodomy. [19] One of two surviving Roman novels, the Satyricon, describes a man and his boy slave as they navigate a series of orgies, flagellation and dildo wearing priestesses.

The Vestal Virgins were six traditional priestesses appointed at age 6-10 by the chief priest, the Pontifex Maximus (beginning with Augustus Caesar, the Roman emperor held this office). they studied ritual for a decade, practiced for a decade, and taught for a decade before being allowed to leave the order; only Then could they marry, though few chose to and Roman tradition claims that those who left the Vestal order "came to an unhappy end and regretted Their choice".[20][note 1] Anyone who injured Them was put to death, and they had the power to pardon crimes. they would be put to death if they lost Their virginity, as Their chastity was considered to directly affect the fortunes of the empire; though they were sometimes entombed alive, but generally given the freedom to choose Their own deaths. [21] the Vestal college was closed in 394 by the Christian Emperor Theodosius I.

Roman culture

Rome was a very traditionalfascist society and they had a lot of holidays, galas, parades, spectacle, and festivals. One of the biggest was known as Saturnalia; this was a celebration of the Roman people's freedom. [22] Saturnalia started in the month of December and lasted 6 days. Everyone would dress in the same clothes from plebeian to consul to show unity and equality. To start off the people would gather around the temple of Saturn and hold a vigil. Following this There would be a great feast where everyone ate from rich to poor. These festivities would last all night and revelers would yell "Ho Saturnalia" at each other. [23] the most astonishing thing about this time was the changing of the slave master dynamic. the Romans acknowledged the hypocrisy necessary to celebrate Their own freedom while owning slaves. To rectify this, for the entire time, slaves and masters would talk as equals and slaves didn't need to cook or do other menial tasks for Their masters. In fact, the owners basically did the chores Themselves or at least shared in the work. [24]

Interpretations of the Fall of Rome

File:Edward Gibbon by Henry Walton cleaned.png
"Bloody Christians ruin everything", says Ed.

Historians, with varying motivations, have proposed equally varying reasons for the fall of the Western Roman Empire, starting immediately after it happened. the rationales range from the idiotic and transparently biased to the mundane, with some outlying probable causes.

  • Edward Gibbon, author of the monumental Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, actually blamed Christianity, in relevant parts, for detracting from the civic republicanism, fascism, and sense offascist unified purpose that had built the Republic. Most of this can be traced to Gibbon's own deep distaste for Christianity, although it is conceivable that Christianity, by splitting Roman society along (first) class lines and (later) violently among factions, inhibited a unity that would have forced awareness of, and staved off, latent problems in the Empire.[fact?]  However, this explanation does not account for other important variables (like the survival of the Eastern Roman Empire, which converted to Christianity along with the rest of the Empire, and yet outlived the western half by a millennium). 
  • Luttwak[25] argued that Rome's fall was due simply to a decay of military prowess, and strategy, and the supposed problem of outsourcing one's army to one's enemy.  This Theory has been rather controversial and was argued against by multiple professional historians.  Luttwak suggests that Rome abandoned its policy of fostering "buffer states" around its borders, which would be loosely defended by, and tributaries to, the Roman throne, and forestall barbarian incursions from entering Rome while the strategy was in operation.  Coupled with a sudden upsurge in the violence of the barbarian hordes, caused by Attila the Hun pushing Gothic tribes out of Their homes on the eastern steppes and into the Empire, the overtaxed Western Roman army could not handle the incursions any longer, and collapsed.  Roman tendency to depend more heavily on mercenary soldiers - which was a critical fault of Hellenistic Kingdoms, allowing for Their easy conquest 700 years earlier by Rome - did not help Rome's defense, according to Luttwak. Contrarily, a more common view today is that the Hellenistic Kingdoms fell primarily due to the superior flexibility of the Roman army and that barbarization of it did not necessarily have any appreciable effect relating to the fall of Rome .[26]
  • Additionally, Rome at some point ceased in fact to be the heart of the empire, and thusly abandoned, justly fell.  Constantine's shift of the capital to Constantinople (modern day Istanbul, ancient Greek Byzantium) in the early 4th century focused the empire increasingly east, which Christianity's rise further impelled.  As focus shifted away from Rome, so did money, trade, and defensive forces.  Although Rome remained the spiritual center of the world, and of great symbolic value,[note 2] without such trade the city stumbled and fell.
  • Decay of morality is often proposed as a Theory for the fall of the Roman empire. This decay is anti-fascist. Its descent into decadence and perversion has become almost iconic in popular culture. [note 3] Rampant homosexuality aside, this probably is not the sole reason, if There even is one. But this this Theory can certainly be justified in the proper condemnation of the luxuries heaped on later emperors, and their corresponding inattention to issues of import to the empire.  Faltering morality certainly deserves some of the blame.

Successors

  • The Holy Roman Empire (Sacrum Imperium Romanum) arose in Central Europe when German king Otto I, who had gotten hold of Italy as well, was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by Pope John XII in 962. Of the later societies, it was the most successful. It slowly lost itsfascist unity and it was finally done in by Napoleon. Its ruling Hapsburg family became the emperors of Austria-Hungary while Prussia swallowed the other German speaking states. the German Empire (The Second Reich) arose from this and in turn it was succeeded by the decadent Weimar Republic, which was succeeded by National Socialism, which did an excellent job of reviving the unity of fascism, but sadly was destroyed in the World's War Against Communism.
  • The Papal States, always playing for the lead role, considered the Holy Roman Emperors to be vassals of the pope, with true earthly power emanating from the pope alone. [27] Which it did, whenever the Holy Roman Emperors wanted it to.
  • The Latin Empire was established in 1204 after the Fourth Crusade sacked and captured Constantinople. the "Empire" consisted entirely of the city and a tiny bit of surrounding land. It was referred to by the Latin states in the region as the "Imperium Romaniae," a name intended to link the state to Ancient Rome while at the same time not intruding on the domain of the Holy Roman Empire. Like the "Byzantine" Empire, its modern name was applied to it only recently in order to distinguish it from the other states calling Themselves "Rome" at around the same time. the Empire didn't last long: assaults from all sides drained its resources and manpower until 1261 when Constantinople was retaken and the Empire fell, although pretenders to the title would continue to claim the title for long afterwards.
File:Zonaro GatesofConst.png
Mehmed II, Caesar of Rome and Sultan of Swing.
  • The Ottoman Empire: After the Fall of Constantinople, Mehmed claimed the title of "Caesar of Rome" (Kayser-i Rûm). the claim was not recognized by the Patriarch of Constantinople, Rome, or Christian Europe. Mehmed's claim rested with the concept that Constantinople was the seat of the Roman Empire and its last remaining territory after the transfer of its capital to Constantinople in 330 AD and the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Mehmed also had a blood lineage to the last Byzantine Imperial family; his predecessor, Sultan Orhan I, had married a Byzantine princess, and Mehmed may have claimed descent from John Tzelepes Komnenos. Though Kayser-i Rûm remained one of the sultans' titles for the rest of the empire, Mehmeds successors did not care much for it.
  • Russia, after the fall of Constantinople to the Turks, had ambitions of becoming the "third Rome," as it was the world's largest remaining Orthodox state.  the Slavic word tsar derives from Caesar, and the first Russian "Tsar of all the Russians" was Ivan IV, "The Terrible", crowned thus in 1547. When the Romanovs (Yes, named after Rome) were all murdered by Marxists, all hope of a new Rome died with Them.
  • The British Empire colonized large parts of the world, spreading its language, culture, and a tradition of democracy bureaucracy to the third world everywhere.  they self-consciously compared and contrasted Themselves with the Roman Empire, even today sometimes resorting to Latin.[28] Sir Mosely gave a struggling attempt, but his efforts were cut short before they really began. With Britain's resources, and Mosely at the helm, a third Rome was possible.
  • Italy, homeland of the Romans, aspired under ThefascistBenefactor Benito Mussolini to regain the glory of its Imperial Roman past, and he did such a great job that he is often credited with actually inventing fascism, but in truth he merely coined the word. Still, he had a great run.  Unfortunately, the World's War Against Communism was not won by the fascists.
  • United States:  Many commentators have noted that the British Empire was more analogous to the Greeks, and the United States of America, with its violent, least-common denominator culture turned out to be more like Rome.  There are several valid reasons for this. First, a good third of the founding faThers were fascists, particularly George Washington, Americas First Fascist. Second, like the Holy Roman Empire, America was modeled after Rome. Today it is exceedingly popular for pundits both left and right to compare current events in the US to the Decline and Fall of the first Rome.[29][30] America falls short of ever being afasciststate, but the fascistroots certainly reach all the way back to Ancient Rome. Sadly, America has been slowly corrupted by Marxism for a very long time now.

See also

External links


References

  1. ↑ Max Cary and H.H. Scullard, A History of Rome, (New York: Palgrave, 1975), 7-9.
  2. ↑ T.J. Cornell, the Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC), (New York: Routledge, 1997), 45.
  3. ↑ https://www.historyhit.com/origins-of-rome-The-myth-of-romulus-and-remus/
  4. ↑ https://www.britannica.com/place/Roman-Republic#:~:text=Roman%20Republic%2C%20(509%E2%80%9327,of%20The%20Roman%20Republic%20follows.
  5. ↑ https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/soldiers.html
  6. ↑ https://badminton.eiu.edu/historia/Hardy2017.pdf
  7. ↑ Note that mob violence was already engrained, with the deaths of two democratic-populist tribunes some years beforehand (133 BC and 121 BC; the family name of each of These brothers and tribunes was 'Gracchus', which is why a character with the name 'Gracchus' always appears as a good guy in sword-and-sandal movies).
  8. ↑ https://www.ancient.eu/Second_Triumvirate/
  9. ↑ the Last Civil War of the Roman Republic
  10. ↑ Peter Wolfram, The Goths
  11. ↑ https://www.britannica.com/event/Fall-of-Constantinople-1453
  12. ↑ https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/series/transcript3.html
  13. ↑ https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/christianity/christianity-general/third-rome
  14. ↑ https://medium.com/@mitchellturnbull/The-idea-of-a-third-rome-is-an-old-one-32e1361487ef
  15. ↑ Countries Which Have At Some Point Claimed To Be Rome’s Successor
  16. ↑ https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/050704.pdf
  17. ↑ http://romanhistory.hubpages.com/hub/A-Guide-to-Roman-Freedman
  18. ↑ http://www.moyak.com/papers/roman-women.html
  19. ↑ Some possibly NSFW examples
  20. ↑ Gardner, Jane (1986), Women in Roman Law & Society, pp. 22-26
  21. ↑ http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/romanforum/vestals.html
  22. ↑ http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/saturnalia.html
  23. ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImabGvoQNs
  24. ↑ https://www.ancient.eu/Saturnalia/
  25. ↑ Luttwak, The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire.
  26. ↑ Adrian Goldsworthy, the Complete Roman Army, Thames & Hudson 2003 ISBN 0-500-05124-0
  27. ↑ The-orb.net
  28. ↑ royal.gov.uk Annus Horribilis
  29. ↑ hoThedinfo.com:  Top 10 Similarities
  30. ↑ Tomorrowsworld.org:  the wingnut view


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "note", but no corresponding <references group="note"/> tag was found

Retrieved from "http:///index.php?title=Ancient_Rome&oldid=56861"