Talk:Affine logic

This is why I don't like cuts-and-pastes from Wi***edia -- 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 23:03, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

There is no mention of Russells paradox, why?

Because it came from Wi***edia and nobody there knows fuck-all about logic, thats why. They are all just tards who copy things from textbooks without actually understanding it. Affine logic is an excellent tool, but despite its strong association with philosophy, it is not the only tool in the philosopher's toolbelt, nor is it even the best tool in certain circumstances. Philosophy is the love of wisdom, and in pursuit of wisdom, some ideas simply defy rational, logical investigation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's says Russell's Paradox does not arise under a paraconsistent logic without contraction. However, just removing contraction is enough to avoid the paradox, thus affine logic (linear logic with weakening) should suffice. Don't worry, I know you're clueless, I'll fix it. 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙡 23:03, 17 December 2022 (UTC)