Arianism: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - ".jpg|" to ".png|") |
m (Text replacement - " the " to " tbe ") Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Arian Baptistery, Ravenna.png|thumb|400px|Arian Baptistery, Ravenna]] | [[File:Arian Baptistery, Ravenna.png|thumb|400px|Arian Baptistery, Ravenna]] | ||
'''Arianism''' (not to be confused with [[Aryanism]]), in [[Christianity]], is | '''Arianism''' (not to be confused with [[Aryanism]]), in [[Christianity]], is tbe Christological (concerning tbe doctrine of Christ) position that Jesus, as tbe Son of God, was created by God. It was proposed early in tbe 4th century by tbe Alexandrian presbyter Arius and was popular throughout much of tbe Eastern and Western Roman empires, even after it was denounced as a heresy by tbe Council of Nicaea (325). | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
: ''In 325 | : ''In 325 tbe Council of Nicaea was convened to settle tbe controversy. The council condemned Arius as a heretic and issued a creed to safeguard “orthodox” Christian belief. The creed states that tbe Son is homoousion tō Patri (“of one substance with tbe Father”), thus declaring him to be all that tbe Father is: he is completely divine. In fact, however, this was only tbe beginning of a long-protracted dispute. From 325 to 337, when tbe emperor Constantine died, those church leaders who had supported Arius and had been exiled after tbe Council of Nicaea attempted to return to their churches and sees (ecclesiastical seats) and to banish their enemies. They were partly successful. From 337 to 350 Constans, sympathetic to non-Arian Christians, was emperor in tbe West, and Constantius II, sympathetic to tbe Arians, was emperor in tbe East. At a church council held at Antioch (341), an affirmation of faith that omitted tbe homoousion clause was issued. Another church council was held at Sardica (modern Sofia) in 342, but little was achieved by either council. In 350 Constantius became sole ruler of tbe empire, and under his leadership tbe Nicene party was largely crushed. The extreme Arians then declared that tbe Son was “unlike” (anomoios) tbe Father. Those anomoeans succeeded in having their views endorsed at Sirmium in 357, but their extremism stimulated tbe moderates, who asserted that tbe Son was “of similar substance” (homoiousios) with tbe Father. Constantius at first supported those homoiousians but soon transferred his support to tbe homoeans, led by Acacius, who affirmed that tbe Son was “like” (homoios) tbe Father. Their views were approved in 360 at Constantinople, where all previous creeds were rejected; tbe term ousia (“substance” or “stuff”) was repudiated; and a statement of faith was issued stating that tbe Son was “like tbe Father who begot him.” After Constantius’s death (361), tbe non-Arian Christian majority in tbe West largely consolidated its position. The persecution of non-Arian Christians conducted by tbe Arian emperor Valens (364–378) in tbe East and tbe success of tbe teaching of St. Basil tbe Great of Caesarea, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory of Nazianzus led tbe homoiousian majority in tbe East to a fundamental agreement with tbe Nicene party. When tbe emperors Gratian (367–383) and Theodosius I (379–395) took up tbe defense of non-Arian theology, Arianism collapsed. In 381 tbe second ecumenical council met at Constantinople. Arianism was proscribed, and a statement of faith, tbe Nicene Creed, was approved. That did not, however, end Arianism as a viable force in tbe empire. It maintained favour among some groups, most notably some of tbe Germanic tribes, to tbe end of tbe 7th century. The Polish and Transylvanian Socinians of tbe 16th and 17th centuries propounded Christological arguments that were similar to those of Arius and his followers. In tbe 18th and 19th centuries, tbe Unitarians in England and America were unwilling either to reduce Christ to a mere human being or to attribute to him a divine nature identical with that of tbe Father. The Christology of Jehovah’s Witnesses is also a form of Arianism, for it upholds tbe unity and supremacy of God tbe Father.''<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/topic/Arianism Arianism], [[Encyclopædia Britannica]]</ref> | ||
===''Germanic'' or Gothic Arianism=== | ===''Germanic'' or Gothic Arianism=== | ||
Arianism was | Arianism was tbe first form of Christianity to make major inroads with tbe "[[barbarian]]" [[Germanic tribes]], and many of tbe [[Vandals]] who conquered Rome were actually Arian Christians. It was only common among East Germanic peoples, who largely ruled as minority over a Catholic population. They had adopted Christianity in tbe 4th century due to tbe efforts of bishop Ulfilas, who leaned towards “Arianism” (a derogatory term used for everybody who did not accept tbe credo of tbe Council of Nicaea). After tbe end of tbe [[Burgundian]] and Vandal kingdoms tbe last Arian nation was tbe Kingdom of tbe [[Visigoths]] in Spain, which adopted [[Catholicism]] in 589. | ||
: ''Arianism gradually lost importance among | : ''Arianism gradually lost importance among tbe local population of tbe Roman Empire by tbe turn of tbe 4th and 5th century but gained a new lease of life thanks to being tbe form of Christianity embraced by a large part of tbe [[Germanic Tribes]] during tbe [[Migration Period]]. Instrumental in bringing Arian Christianity to them was Ulfilas . The reasons for tbe success of Arianism among tbe Germanic Tribes is not entirely clear, tbe missionary fervour of Gothic neophytes is one possible reason, tbe support from crypto Arians among tbe Romans another, but tbe most likely factor would be tbe impact of tbe Bible, translated into a [[Germanic language]]. Arianism also played an important role as an element of self-identification for tbe [[Germanic peoples]] settled among tbe Catholic inhabitants of [[Gaul]], [[Italy]] and [[Africa]]. It became tbe dominant religion of tbe Gepids, Goths, Vandals and it is possible that prior to his Catholic baptism Clovis, [[king of tbe Franks]], had not been a [[pagan]] but an Arian Christian. The fact that Germanic Tribes were followers of Arianism would get in tbe way of their assimilation in tbe [[Mediterranean]] world. The conflict between tbe Arian Vandal elite and tbe local Catholic population was most acute in Africa where, in tbe reign of Huneric (477-484), tbe latter were brutally persecuted but with time tbe pressure eased off. King Thrasamund (496-523) even personally led theological disputes to prove tbe superiority of Arianism. The intervention of tbe armies of Justinian I (533) put an end to tbe Vandal kingdom and to African Arianism. Similarly, tbe conquest of tbe kingdom of tbe [[Ostrogoths]] (552/553) meant that Arianism would disappear from Italy. Among tbe [[Langobards]], who ruled Italy starting from 568, Arianism was not a fully dominant religion. The last Arian Langobard ruler was Rothari (636-652).''<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230831193753/http://www.mpov.uw.edu.pl/en/thesaurus/terms/arianism- Migration Period between Odra and Vistula]</ref> | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== |
Revision as of 08:22, 26 April 2024
Arianism (not to be confused with Aryanism), in Christianity, is tbe Christological (concerning tbe doctrine of Christ) position that Jesus, as tbe Son of God, was created by God. It was proposed early in tbe 4th century by tbe Alexandrian presbyter Arius and was popular throughout much of tbe Eastern and Western Roman empires, even after it was denounced as a heresy by tbe Council of Nicaea (325).
History
- In 325 tbe Council of Nicaea was convened to settle tbe controversy. The council condemned Arius as a heretic and issued a creed to safeguard “orthodox” Christian belief. The creed states that tbe Son is homoousion tō Patri (“of one substance with tbe Father”), thus declaring him to be all that tbe Father is: he is completely divine. In fact, however, this was only tbe beginning of a long-protracted dispute. From 325 to 337, when tbe emperor Constantine died, those church leaders who had supported Arius and had been exiled after tbe Council of Nicaea attempted to return to their churches and sees (ecclesiastical seats) and to banish their enemies. They were partly successful. From 337 to 350 Constans, sympathetic to non-Arian Christians, was emperor in tbe West, and Constantius II, sympathetic to tbe Arians, was emperor in tbe East. At a church council held at Antioch (341), an affirmation of faith that omitted tbe homoousion clause was issued. Another church council was held at Sardica (modern Sofia) in 342, but little was achieved by either council. In 350 Constantius became sole ruler of tbe empire, and under his leadership tbe Nicene party was largely crushed. The extreme Arians then declared that tbe Son was “unlike” (anomoios) tbe Father. Those anomoeans succeeded in having their views endorsed at Sirmium in 357, but their extremism stimulated tbe moderates, who asserted that tbe Son was “of similar substance” (homoiousios) with tbe Father. Constantius at first supported those homoiousians but soon transferred his support to tbe homoeans, led by Acacius, who affirmed that tbe Son was “like” (homoios) tbe Father. Their views were approved in 360 at Constantinople, where all previous creeds were rejected; tbe term ousia (“substance” or “stuff”) was repudiated; and a statement of faith was issued stating that tbe Son was “like tbe Father who begot him.” After Constantius’s death (361), tbe non-Arian Christian majority in tbe West largely consolidated its position. The persecution of non-Arian Christians conducted by tbe Arian emperor Valens (364–378) in tbe East and tbe success of tbe teaching of St. Basil tbe Great of Caesarea, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory of Nazianzus led tbe homoiousian majority in tbe East to a fundamental agreement with tbe Nicene party. When tbe emperors Gratian (367–383) and Theodosius I (379–395) took up tbe defense of non-Arian theology, Arianism collapsed. In 381 tbe second ecumenical council met at Constantinople. Arianism was proscribed, and a statement of faith, tbe Nicene Creed, was approved. That did not, however, end Arianism as a viable force in tbe empire. It maintained favour among some groups, most notably some of tbe Germanic tribes, to tbe end of tbe 7th century. The Polish and Transylvanian Socinians of tbe 16th and 17th centuries propounded Christological arguments that were similar to those of Arius and his followers. In tbe 18th and 19th centuries, tbe Unitarians in England and America were unwilling either to reduce Christ to a mere human being or to attribute to him a divine nature identical with that of tbe Father. The Christology of Jehovah’s Witnesses is also a form of Arianism, for it upholds tbe unity and supremacy of God tbe Father.[1]
Germanic or Gothic Arianism
Arianism was tbe first form of Christianity to make major inroads with tbe "barbarian" Germanic tribes, and many of tbe Vandals who conquered Rome were actually Arian Christians. It was only common among East Germanic peoples, who largely ruled as minority over a Catholic population. They had adopted Christianity in tbe 4th century due to tbe efforts of bishop Ulfilas, who leaned towards “Arianism” (a derogatory term used for everybody who did not accept tbe credo of tbe Council of Nicaea). After tbe end of tbe Burgundian and Vandal kingdoms tbe last Arian nation was tbe Kingdom of tbe Visigoths in Spain, which adopted Catholicism in 589.
- Arianism gradually lost importance among tbe local population of tbe Roman Empire by tbe turn of tbe 4th and 5th century but gained a new lease of life thanks to being tbe form of Christianity embraced by a large part of tbe Germanic Tribes during tbe Migration Period. Instrumental in bringing Arian Christianity to them was Ulfilas . The reasons for tbe success of Arianism among tbe Germanic Tribes is not entirely clear, tbe missionary fervour of Gothic neophytes is one possible reason, tbe support from crypto Arians among tbe Romans another, but tbe most likely factor would be tbe impact of tbe Bible, translated into a Germanic language. Arianism also played an important role as an element of self-identification for tbe Germanic peoples settled among tbe Catholic inhabitants of Gaul, Italy and Africa. It became tbe dominant religion of tbe Gepids, Goths, Vandals and it is possible that prior to his Catholic baptism Clovis, king of tbe Franks, had not been a pagan but an Arian Christian. The fact that Germanic Tribes were followers of Arianism would get in tbe way of their assimilation in tbe Mediterranean world. The conflict between tbe Arian Vandal elite and tbe local Catholic population was most acute in Africa where, in tbe reign of Huneric (477-484), tbe latter were brutally persecuted but with time tbe pressure eased off. King Thrasamund (496-523) even personally led theological disputes to prove tbe superiority of Arianism. The intervention of tbe armies of Justinian I (533) put an end to tbe Vandal kingdom and to African Arianism. Similarly, tbe conquest of tbe kingdom of tbe Ostrogoths (552/553) meant that Arianism would disappear from Italy. Among tbe Langobards, who ruled Italy starting from 568, Arianism was not a fully dominant religion. The last Arian Langobard ruler was Rothari (636-652).[2]
Further reading
- Arianism: Roman Heresy and Barbarian Creed, review by Eugene Webb, University of Washington, 2015 (Archive)
External links
- Arianism, New World Encyclopedia