The holohoax
Hard evidence contradicting a "holocaust"
The "Holocaust" was NOT a genocide. This is fact. It really never happened, there were not even so called "6 million" jews in Europe at that time, and there were not even enough ovens to burn that amount as it was peaceful in Auschwitz, most "holocaust" survivors even admit to making up these stories and are even paid to cry and boo hoo on camera to how "terrible" it was when all Auschwitz was, was a concentration camp for jews, they were taken care of there. they have pools, a soccer field, an orchestra, and all these facts are hidden, and you will hear nothing else other than it was "torcher".
In the face of extensive credible evidence, volumes of governmental documents from both sides that fail to mention any hint of a planned genocide, "confessions" made only under torture, doctored photographs, lack of any film footage, no written records, testimony by wholly independent groups such as the International Red Cross, lack of physical proof or bodies, not to mention the remains of the concentration camps themselves, ridiculous and impossible stories and crematoria insufficient by several orders of magnitude, the ongoing multibillion dollar Holocaust industry continues to persist.[1]
There were camps, but they were hardly death camps. In fact, they were far more comfortable than their Japanese, Italian, American, Russian, or British equivalents. Implicitly and explicitly, it is very easily shown that this entire story is just that, a story. The math does not work. The Science state (Which they also got), and now the continuation of a multi-billion-dollar Holocaust story industry.[2]
The Holocaust is a conspiracy theory as old as WW2 itself. There was no paperwork. None. So, they would have you believe that the German government officials, train engineers, truck drivers, manufacturers, medical doctors, prison guards, and even other inmates were all in on it, that they were careful to cover up a supposed murder of 6 million people in bureaucratic language. [3]
jews, who declared war on Germany were resettled to Palestine, the place they claimed they wanted to go. Deported. Out. You cannot have formally declared enemies running loose on your soil. Neighborhoods, filled with known and self-declared enemies, were cordoned off and placed under guard.[4]
Theresienstadt
Perhaps the greatest example of this conspiracy theory is Theresienstadt, a transit camp in the former state of Czechoslovakia was a wonderful resettlement community. When the International Red Cross paid their visits in 1944, they had full access, including surprise visits and found residents planting flowers and decorating the barracks. they reported the people as "Happy" and "a model community" with "an abundance of medical care, food, entertainment, and housing space". There was plenty of film documentation of Theresienstadt as well, in which the residents were filmed going about their business, writing letters, swimming in the olympic sized swimming pool, eating meals, or watching movies.[5] All of that changed when the Allies purosely began bombing that facility's infrastructure, destoying food and medicine deliveries to the camp, and 7500 prisoners died in Theresienstadt. However about 100,000 people were moved through safely to Palestine, or elsewhere in the world. The holohoax and conspiracy theorists would have you believe that all the happy residents of Thereseinstadt were "acting" and that the international Red Cross was "in on it".[6]
Professor Carto
Professor Willis Carto, an American Historian, founded the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) in 1978. Still operating out of California, the Institute convened conferences and published journals which challenged the stories and conspiracy theories, in order reveal the actual truth about the invented past that expose the false narratives of victimhood. Scholars, courts and academic institutions have praised IHR, but holocaust industry propagandists none-the-less continue to smear IHR, rather than confront its fact-based challenges.[7]
jews around the world knowingly fabricated evidence of their own invented genocide:
- to extract reparations from Germany
- gain world sympathy
- facilitate the theft of Palestinian land
- create Israel
- manipulate major institutions
- manipulate governments
- control Hollywood
- control the media
- control academia
- make challenging the Holocaust illegal
The advent of the internet and free speech
The advent of the internet has finally allowed people to speak their mind on this subject. Indeed, since the 1980s, Holocaust truth has migrated from academic journals and conferences to the social media of the Internet. Today, a younger generation of Holocaust truthers are active on social media forums like Facebook and Twitter, news websites, this FasciPedia platform, and the anonymous forums 4Chan and 8kun. Moreover, with the passage of time, historical distance has an effect. Truth, logic, and common sense outlives the fake stories, like those of bizarre and pointless experiments done at Nováky, pictured left. they simply have not aged well. According to several polls, one in three people in Britain do not believe the Holocaust ever happened.[8]
The #Holohoax hashtag is a global phenomenon. It is especially popular on January 27, International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Critisism and suppression
In 2021, a petition entitled “No to a Holocaust memorial at the Place des Nations in Geneva!” was widely circulated by email, notably to Geneva’s elected officials. The headline on the petition is : “The Holocaust is a fraud.”[9][10]
T-shirts bearing "antisemitic slogans" pointing out that the Holocaust is a hoax are sold online through the Goyim Defense League’s video streaming website.[11]
In May 2019, British songwriter and folk singer Alison Chabloz was convicted by a London court of sending “offensive, indecent or menacing messages” after merely posting YouTube videos in which she referred, in one of her songs, to the Holocaust as “just a bunch of lies.”[12]
So how do we explain the fact that for forty-five years since the end of World War Two, we have all, internationally, globally, been beset by a common guilt: the idea that the human race was responsible for liquidating six million human beings in gas chambers? Well, the answer is: we have been subjected to the biggest propaganda offensive that the human race has ever known.
—David Irving, remarks presented to the Tenth International Revisionist Conference of the Institute for Historical Review, October 1990.
A healthy debate promotes understanding and brings TRUTH to the surface. But in judeo-Marxist societies, certain matters are closed for discussion. Holocaust propagandists refuse to discuss or debate the subject because the Holocaust narrative is based entirely on stories. It falls apart with even the slightest scrutiny. Bad stories that have not aged well. Instead, it is made illegal to question the "holocaust". they have the power to do this, as is evident, because it is law in many places.
The Facts
No Autopsy Reports of any Gassing victims
There are NO autopsy reports of any Nazi gassing victims from any western doctors. Although there were many thousands of corpses available in German concentration camps by the end of the war and although at least 1,000 autopsies were performed, none showed any evidence of death by poison gas or poison. Dr. Charles P. Larson made those autopsies to find proof of gassings but found nothing.
No other western doctors ever claimed to have found any forensic medical evidence of gassings either. So, what indicators of gassing were the doctors looking for? Larson gives no answer but the simple fact is that if there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The corpses would have been bright cherry RED. The Soviets had supposedly performed autopsies (on red corpses from CO) to support their diesel gas van claims at the Kharkov and Krasnodar trials in 1943—but those trials were such obvious shams that almost no one takes them seriously today.
The image above is probably the best of many available today showing what corpses from cyanide and carbon monoxide poisoning look like. This stunning image is from the Textbook of Maritime Medicine.
“Fig. 10.9.2: Bright red lividity on the dorsal side of the body as the expression of lethal carbon monoxide poisoning. Livor mortis is bright red in cases of carbon monoxide or hydrocyanide poisoning (or in cases where the corpse is kept in cold storage). Carbon monoxide is a colourless and odourless gas that arises, for example, from incomplete fuel combustion. Thus it is always necessary – primarily for self-protection – to consider or exclude carbon monoxide poisoning, particularly when bodies with bright red lividity are found in engine rooms, after engine room fires (automatic carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system!) or in boiler houses.” Textbook of Maritime Medicine Fig. 10.9.2
More
An example of authentic but misleadingly presented images is by showing images from the Western Holocaust camps and falsely imply that the images show Holocaust gas victims. The photo shows a British Army bulldozer pushing bodies into a mass grave at the Bergen-Belsen camp in 1945. Today, it is admitted even by non-revisionsits that the deaths in this camp were not due to gassings, but due to causes such as starvation and diseases.
Notably, as discussed in the article on the Western Holocaust camps, it is no longer claimed that there were mass extermination camps using gas chambers in Germany itself, despite this being "proven" during the Nuremberg trials and "documented" with even today often shown photographs and films of heaps of corpses, who had actually died of causes such as the disease typhus. Also many other early descriptions of the Holocaust differ widely and contradictorily from the particular version that is now the "standardized" politically correct view.
The Holocaust is, according to politically correct and enforced history, a deliberate genocide by National Socialist Germany in which approximately six million Jews were killed. In addition, some non-Jewish groups claimed to have been killed by similar methods are sometimes included. Holocaust revisionists dispute that this deliberate genocide occurred.
Exceptionally, the politically correct Holocaust version has become an official "Truth", with an increasing number of Western countries by law enforcing censorship of free speech and research on the Holocaust and with powerful lobby groups demanding that worldwide censorship on free speech and research must be implemented. See Anti-Holocaust revisionism.
Very briefly, most Holocaust revisionists argue that Jews were for several different reasons deported to concentration camps and used for forced labour, suffered many hardships and deaths during the war, but that there was no plan or attempt to genocide Jews, no homicidal gas chambers, and that the number of deaths is greatly exaggerated. An example of this was the plaque at the gates of Auschwitz concentration camp which claimed "four million died here". After decades had passed by the late 1980s this plaque mysteriously disappeared and now has been replaced by one which reads "over one million died here" which is a mysterious loss of about three million people. The deportations are argued to have been seen as a temporary wartime measure, with a permanent Jewish expulsion from Europe to occur after the war. A primary cause of the politically correct view is argued to be wartime Allied psychological warfare, which was continued into the postwar period, in part due to this being beneficial for various parties (both non-Jewish and Jewish), in part due to self-perpetuating processes similar to those occurring during witch-hunts.
Related issues include argued continued exploitation of the Holocaust, argued Holocaust uniqueness, and argued similarities with a religion.
The politically correct view on the Holocaust can be found in numerous easily available sources. This article will mainly briefly outline some of the less often mentioned arguments regarding the Holocaust, which are discussed in more detail in other articles.
Holocaustianity
Various aspects related to the Holocaust have sometimes been compared with a religion. See Holocaustianity.
The Holocaust vs. other claimed large scale killings
The Holocaust is often described as a unique event, as implied by the term "The Holocaust". The book The Holocaust Industry stated that one reason that this is seen as very important is because "unique suffering confers unique entitlement." The uniqueness claim may also be an important part of Holocaustianity. Even if accepting the politically correct description as correct, then this uniqueness claim is still dubious. There are many large scale killings (real or claimed) throughout human history (including by Jews).
See the article on Holocaust uniqueness.
Argued reasons for the German deportations/camps and argued exploitation by others
Various groups are argued to have exploited the politically correct Holocaust version. Some of these arguments accept the politically correct version as correct, but still argue that it has been used for exploitation.
Other exploitation arguments rely on the revisionist version of what happened. Revisionists also argue that such exploitation by various groups is the main explanation for why the politically correct version appeared and continues to be influential.Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name
See the article on Holocaust motivations regarding more details.
What revisionists do not argue
The Holocaust revisionist Germar Rudolf has stated that "Most people have misconceptions about what Holocaust revisionists (frequently pejoratively labeled as “Holocaust deniers” or “negationists”) claim and what they do not claim. This is caused by disinformation spread by the mass media, some of it due to journalists innocently yet irresponsibly copying from others, some of it spread with malicious intend. The brief list below is meant to give you a brief overview as to what we revisionists say and what we do not say. [...] Not all revisionist scholars might agree with all the points listed, but in general the broad consensus among us does probably look like this:"[13]
| Claim | Fact |
|---|---|
| They deny that Jews were persecuted | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that Jews were deprived of civil rights | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that Jews were deported | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny the Jews were herded into ghettos | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny the existence of concentration camps | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that Jews were put to forced labor | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny the existence of crematoria in concentration camps | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that Jews died for a great number of reasons: epidemics, malnutrition, diseases, mistreatment | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that other minorities were also persecuted as well, such as gypsies and political dissenters | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that the treatment of the Jews was unjust | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny the victims their dignity | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny the victims to be remembered | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny to show compassion for the victims | Wrong They do not deny this |
| They deny that there was a plan to murder all Jews | Correct This is what they claim |
| They deny that Jews were murdered systematically | Correct This is what they claim |
| They deny the existence of gas chambers for mass murder | Correct This is what they claim |
| They deny that six million Jews died in the Holocaust | Correct This is what they claim |
Many earlier Holocaust claims have been admitted to be incorrect
Revisionists argue that many earlier Holocaust claims, which were presented as definite truths, have later been admitted to be incorrect. This is often unknown to general public. For example:
- See Holocaust testimonial evidence and the section "Admitted false confessors and witnesses" on this topic.
- See Holocaust demographics on many earlier clams regarding numbers killed for different groups and/or at different locations having been greatly reduced.
- See Western Holocaust camps on changing claims regarding these camps, such as these camps no longer claimed to have been "extermination camps" and now abandoned claims of production of human skin artifacts, such as lampshades.
- See Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka camps on changing claims regarding these camps, such as now abandoned claims of steam killings at Treblinka, despite supposedly being "confirmed" by an official investigation.
- See Human soap on changing claims regarding this.
- See Allied psychological warfare on aspects such as now admitted false propaganda claims by the Allies on German atrocities during the First World War.
- See the Nuremberg trials regarding now admitted use of torture in order to get confessions, false reports by commissions, and admitted document forgeries.
- See Extraordinary State Commission on many now admitted false claims by this important Soviet organization.
Holocaust revisionists have argued that many of these claims were abandoned only reluctantly, after criticisms and due to these claims not being seen as absolutely essential for the genocidal claims. However, revisionists have argued, for example, that the Western Holocaust camps are no longer claimed to have been extermination camps, but that the earlier cited but now discredited "evidence" for extermination camps existing in western areas were not qualitatively different from the still cited claimed evidence for extermination camps existing in Poland.[14][13]
The revisionist Thomas Kues has argued that the change regarding the Western Holocaust camps was due to criticisms by Holocaust revisionists and that "This shows that Holocaust historians were aware of the revisionists already from the start, and that by 1960 they had already adopted the strategy of discreetly cutting out the most untenable parts of the gas chamber mythos (without even for a moment considering the evidential foundation of the remainder) while avoiding naming the revisionists whose writings made these tactical retreats necessary."[15]
Hierarchy of evidence
Revisionists argue that in courts, there is a generally agreed on hierarchy regarding how valuable different forms of evidence are, with the most valuable mentioned first in the list below:[14]
- Material evidence (for example, gas chambers, corpses). See Holocaust material evidence.
- Documentary evidence (for example, National Socialist documents). See Holocaust documentary evidence.
- Party testimony (for example, "Holocaust survivor" statements and trial "confessions"). See Holocaust testimonial evidence.
The evidence argued to support the non-revisionist version is argued to mostly consist of the weakest form of evidence (party testimony).[14]
Revisionists have argued that some mainstream historians have in effect admitted that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is very weak.[16]
Anti-Holocaust revisionism
[[File:Holocaust Denial Crime 2016.png|thumb|300px|left|European countries with "Holocaust denial" laws. In addition, some countries such as Australia and the Netherlands use other laws with the same effect.
The Holocaust, in many Western countries, is an official "Truth" in that it is illegal to discuss and research it freely. Continued attempts are made to extend such censorship to the remaining Western countries that still allow free debate and research on the issue. In 2014 Russia[17] and Greece implemented "Holocaust denial" laws. In 2015, Romania implemented such a law (with the assistance of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum).[18] In 2016, Italy implemented a "Holocaust denial" law.
Non-revisionists attempt to downplay the censorship by arguing that there are still other countries without censorship. This ignores the increasing number of European countries with censorship, that the censorship in Germany makes it very difficult for Germans to defend themselves against accusations, that the same increasingly applies to Europeans more generally as the Holocaust is an important cause of White guilt, and that the censorship in countries such as Poland (the location of the main "extermination" Holocaust camps) makes it difficult to do research on the Holocaust material evidence.
In 2013, the World Jewish Congress passed a resolution demanding that all the countries of the world must prohibit public "Holocaust denial".[19]
Lobbying efforts are continuing to make the European Union pass legislation prohibiting free discussion and research in all EU countries.
See the article on Anti-Holocaust revisionism on topics such as:
- Censorship on free speech and research in an increasing number of countries.
- Other forms of persecutions.
- Hate speech allegations
- Conspiracy theory allegations.
- The term "Holocaust denial".
Bibliography
Other topics
- Holocaust awareness
- Holocaust camps
- Holocaust demographics
- Holocaust education
- Holocaust fictional descriptions
- Holocaust industry
- Holocaust Memorial Days
- Allied psychological warfare
- Claimed mass killings of Germans by the WWII Allies
- Claimed mass killings of non-Jews by National Socialist Germany
- Etymology of the term "The Holocaust"
- Kastner train
External links
See Holocaust revisionist websites.
References
- ↑ obert Solomon Wistrich, “Introduction: Lying About the Holocaust,” in Robert Solomon Wistrich, ed., Holocaust Denial: The Politics of Perfidy(Jerusalem and Berlin: Hebrew University Magnus Press & De Gruyter, 2012)
- ↑ https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/deceiving-the-public.
- ↑ George Michael, Willis Carto and the American Far Right (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2008).
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/world/middleeast/11cnd-iran.html
- ↑ ADL, “In Iran, Holocaust Denial and Mockery are Alive and Well,” March 11, 2016, https://www.adl.org/blog/in-iran-holocaust-denial-and-mockery-are-alive-and-well.
- ↑ https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/Greenblatt.012920.Testimony.pdf
- ↑ Holocaust Denial on Trial, Irving v. Penguin Books Ltd. and Deborah Lipstadt, Emory University Center for Digital Scholarship.
- ↑ .Julia Neuberger, Antisemitism: What It Is. What It Isn’t. Why It Matters. (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2019), 90-92.
- ↑ Une pétition négationniste contre un projet de mémorial de la Shoah à Genève, The Times of Israel France, August 17, 2021, https://fr.timesofisrael.com/une-petition-negationniste-contre-un-projet-de-memorial-de-la-shoah-a-geneve/.
- ↑ Eric Felley, “Holocauste: une pétition négationniste dénoncée à Genève,” Le Matin, August 13, 2021, https://www.lematin.ch/story/holocauste-une-petition-negationniste-denoncee-a-geneve-407434819921.
- ↑ Gabe Stutman, Notorious Bay Area anti-Semite is selling Hitler T-shirts online, The Times of Israel, March 10, 2021 https://www.timesofisrael.com/notorious-bay-area-anti-semite-is-selling-hitler-t-shirts-online/
- ↑ Sam Sokol, “Holocaust-denying UK blogger says she’s been banned from France for 40 years,” The Times of Israel, Aug. 13, 2019, https://www.timesofisrael.com/holocaust-denying-blogger-says-shes-banned-from-france-for-40-years
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 German Rudolf's Website. http://germarrudolf.com/
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust—Controversial Issues Cross Examined 2nd, revised and corrected edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15
- ↑ A Chronicle of Holocaust Revisionism, Part 3 (1956-1960) https://codoh.com/library/document/3120/
- ↑ The Non-Jewish Stake in the Holocaust Mythology: Why the Continued Success of a Failed Ideology? https://codoh.com/library/document/1919/?lang=en
- ↑ https://forward.com/news/breaking-news/197664/holocaust-deniers-in-russia-now-face-five-years-in/
- ↑ Why Romania had to ban Holocaust denial twice https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/07/27/why-romania-had-to-ban-holocaust-denial-twice/
- ↑ WJC Approves Resolution Calling for Ban of Public Holocaust Denial http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/wjc-approves-resolution-calling-for-ban-of-public-holocaust-denial.premium-1.519763